Show Me the Fossils!

[Indeependent]

Not at all. The evidence that biological organisms evolve is well documented. That species adapt and change due to environmental pressures is also well documented.

That the earth is flat and 6,000 years old... not so much.

Once again, who's the moron who says the earth is flat?
The earth can't be 6,000 years old because the sun didn't sun form until after the 4th cycle of creation.
You see, the problem is that you don't read anything you don't want to understand...that's makes you boring.

 

[Hollie]

Once again, who's the moron who says the earth is flat?
The earth can't be 6,000 years old because the sun didn't sun form until after the 4th cycle of creation.
You see, the problem is that you don't read anything you don't want to understand...that's makes you boring.

The 4th cycle of godly creation?

 

[Indeependent]

The 4th cycle of godly creation?

The KJ erroneously translates the word Erev as Evening when it means Mixture as in the Mixed Multlitude that left Egypt with the Children Of Israel.
The KJ erroneously translates the word Boker as Day when it means Clarity.
The first 3 cycles of creation went through a metamorphosis to in order for the proper creations to take place...
The 4 cycles of Clarity and Mixture before the sun formed took billions of years.

 

[Hollie]

The KJ erroneously translates the word Erev as Evening when it means Mixture as in the Mixed Multlitude that left Egypt with the Children Of Israel.
The KJ erroneously translates the word Boker as Day when it means Clarity.
The first 3 cycles of creation went through a metamorphosis to in order for the proper creations to take place...
The 4 cycles of Clarity and Mixture before the sun formed took billions of years.

Hinduism has a different version. How did your religion get it so wrong?

 

[Indeependent]

Hinduism has a different version. How did your religion get it so wrong?

Hindus worship feces...do you?
How did they get it so right?

 

[toobfreak]

I've asked several times in other threads for Darwinians to show me the fossils that prove that Darwin's ideas have been scientifically proven.

TRY READING THIS:

The Malay Archipelago, Volume 1 by Alfred Russel Wallace

Free kindle book and epub digitized and proofread by volunteers.

www.gutenberg.org

 

[Hollie]

Hindus worship feces...do you?
How did they get it so right?

You're really jealous.

 

[Indeependent]

You're really jealous.

Thanks for admitting you never saw a Hindu's property.
They also have the highest foreclosure rate on Long Island.

 

[Hollie]

Thanks for admitting you never saw a Hindu's property.
They also have the highest foreclosure rate on Long Island.

Oh, my.

 

[abu afak]

The evolution of (Hominid) skull sizes in order to now​

https://anthropologynet.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/fossil-hominid-skulls.jpg

`

Seymour Flops Flops
`

 

[alang1216]

some call it adam and eve,, others call it a wet sponge,,

then there are those like me that just dont know and may never know,,

which one are you

I have no clue what a 'wet sponge' is? What I can say is that I have never encountered anything I believe was supernatural. On the other hand, my studies tell me that everything that was needed to begin life on earth and then have it evolve into us can be explained by natural events.

I've read the Bible and don't understand why believers insist evolution is fake. They have no clue how their deity created us but they insist they know how he didn't. How is that even possible?

 

[Indeependent]

The evolution of (Hominid) skull sizes in order to now​

https://anthropologynet.files.wordpress.com/2007/06/fossil-hominid-skulls.jpg

View attachment 594895


`

Seymour Flops Flops
`

Nice theories!

 

[Seymour Flops]

I'm well

Photographs of fossils as well as the physical evidence is available all across the web.

Would you find it shocking to learn that T-Rex exhibits, for one example, are typically not assembled from rock, calcified bones as the exhibit would literally weigh many tons.

That might not have been conveyed at the Benny Hinn madrassah.

Here's one source you could have found yourself.

Museum of Paleontology | U-M LSA Museum of Paleontology

lsa.umich.edu

It might be helpful if you contacted the myseum and provided the data you have acquired as a way to refute the fossil record as one, large global conspiracy of those evilutionist, atheist scientists.

Be sure to copy us on your email to the muse

I'm well aware that many/most fossils displayed in museums are primarily fakes. This is the first time I've seen the fakery excused by claiming that the real fossils would be too heavy.

Where are the "real" t-rex fossil kept? In warehouses with anti gravity fields?

The Houston Museum of natural science has a massive Foulcalt pendulum hanging from its ceilng ringed by balconies occupied at times by hundreds of people with no collapse over several decades. They seem to have mastered that engineering feat so I doubt weight concerns are the reason that it's t-rex display is primarily man-made materials.

If you visit, check out also the aviation Museum in Galveston. You will no doubt be surprised to find that heavier than air machines can actually fly.

 

[alang1216]

isnt asking for the impossible the same as asking for something that doesnt exist??

No, it is playing semantics. You asked me to prove Darwin right, which I said was impossible. I asked you to prove Darwin wrong, which I said was equally impossible. Two impossibilities but Darwin was either right or wrong.

 

[progressive hunter]

I have no clue what a 'wet sponge' is? What I can say is that I have never encountered anything I believe was supernatural. On the other hand, my studies tell me that everything that was needed to begin life on earth and then have it evolve into us can be explained by natural events.

I've read the Bible and don't understand why believers insist evolution is fake. They have no clue how their deity created us but they insist they know how he didn't. How is that even possible?

natural events huh??
tell me how does one type of animal turn into a completely other type??
like the claim that a T-rex turned into a chicken??

 

[progressive hunter]

No, it is playing semantics. You asked me to prove Darwin right, which I said was impossible. I asked you to prove Darwin wrong, which I said was equally impossible. Two impossibilities but Darwin was either right or wrong.

you may want to go back and reread what you said that I responded too,,,

 

[Maxnovax]

What ever trump did it worked no wars

 

[Seymour Flops]

Giant Noah's Ark Attraction In Kentucky Features Caged Dinosaurs​

Come on. This is actual earth history, just a few thousand years ago. Didn't you know that evilutionist atheist scientists are out every night, under cover of darkness with their spades and shovels planting evidence as a part of their global conspiracy?

I thought you had this all figured out.








It's like the 'Flintstones,' except on a big boat.
Ed Mazza | HuffPost

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/noahs-ark-dinosaurs_n_577d9ff8e4b0344d514dea93
https://twitter.com/share?text=That giant Noah's Ark in Kentucky features dinosaurs in cages&url=https://www.huffpost.com/entry/noahs-ark-dinosaurs_n_577d9ff8e4b0344d514dea93?utm_campaign=share_twitter&ncid=engmodushpmg00000004&hashtags=&via=HuffPostWeird

Dinosaurs on display in a cage at the Ark Encounter in Kentucky. The creationist behind the attraction claims dinosaurs and man lived together.
BLOOMBERG VIA GETTY IMAGES

The creationist behind that attraction is using the same method that the Darwinians use in their own museum attractions: Put together a model based on their ideas of what the dinosaur era looked like, and expect people to accept it because they "see it with their own eyes."

 

[Seymour Flops]

I you agree that descent from a common ancestor has been proven beyond reasonable doubt, we agree.

I applaud your efforts to find common ground. Unfortunately, I can't sign off on that.

My take is that the "evidence" that all life on Earth descends from one common ancestor is based on some version of "well, it must have."

That is the same idea that drives the biblical creation theory, not just the Darwinian evolutionary theory.

Also driving acceptance of this idea is the implausibility of all of the theories of abiogenesis, i.e. life arising from non-life. Since it is so improbable, I suppose it is easier to believe that abiogenesis happened one time only and that all life came from that one highly unlikely event.

Highly unlikely events happen, especially in a universe so large. But not only would such a highly unlikely event have to happen, but the life created in that event would have to be stable enough that it reproduced, and its descendants also stable enough to reproduce until the snowball effect took over. In actual observation, one time exceedingly rare events tend to be unstable.

I find it more likely to believe that we humans don't understand biogenesis nearly completely, so it may well be that it is a common occurance. Perhaps it happens thousands of times per day, but most of the life thus formed is unstable. Rarely then, does it lead to self-replicating life.

If it happens that often, then there is no reason to believe that only one of those events was the beginning of all life on Earth. Why only once that life was created and sustained? Why not twice, thrice, or dozens of times?

Maybe there is more evidence of descent from a common ancestor that I'm not aware of. If so I welcome you or others to present it.

 

[Hollie]

I'm well

I'm well aware that many/most fossils displayed in museums are primarily fakes. This is the first time I've seen the fakery excused by claiming that the real fossils would be too heavy.

Where are the "real" t-rex fossil kept? In warehouses with anti gravity fields?

The Houston Museum of natural science has a massive Foulcalt pendulum hanging from its ceilng ringed by balconies occupied at times by hundreds of people with no collapse over several decades. They seem to have mastered that engineering feat so I doubt weight concerns are the reason that it's t-rex display is primarily man-made materials.

If you visit, check out also the aviation Museum in Galveston. You will no doubt be surprised to find that heavier than air machines can actually fly.

You will be surprised to discover that many/most fossils displayed in museums are actually not primarily fakes. What you see, especially with the larger dinosaurs, are accurate castings of the actual fossil artifacts. If you had done your homework, you would know that some of these fossils are worth tens of millions of dollars to private collectors. Fortunately for you, those private collectors can be included in your fake fossil conspiracy theory.

You may believe that the T-Rex, for example, never inhabited the planet and is a ''fake'', invented by evilutionist, atheist scientists but that puts us back to creationers needing to supply some evidence for their conspiracy theories involving the worldwide academic institutions.

Regarding the Houston Museum of natural science, I would point out that your attempt at comparison is a bit silly, The thousands of individual, fossilized bones that comprise a large individual specimen aren't bolted / welded / screwed together like a mechanical device would be assembled. To destroy valuable fossil remains by trying to assemble them like a Toyota makes no sense.

If you had ever been to an aviation museum, the aviation Museum in Galveston or otherwise, you would know that the non-airworthy museum pieces are generally replete with replica pieces, stripped interiors and engine nacelles without engines.

They don't fly.... neither do your conspiracy theories.