Should we be worried that our ISP tech guys may be Jihadis?
I sometimes wonder if Muslims might be monitoring, and collecting my 'flagged' communications in a file somewhere to be used if the SHTF and there is a series of Jihadist terror attacks on outspoken opponents of Islamic conquest.
YIKES! That possibility had never crossed my mind before. The IT techs from India I have used, could actually be anything. One never knows for sure with them. They call me infrequently to see if I need anything. I always wonder what they planted in my computer when I let them go in remotely once, on my new PC and about 3 times on my previous one. I think I'll stick with my local IT favorite even though he didn't catch the virus on this one, and the India boys, did.
Thanks for the question Mojo2. It has made me think more judiciously and suspiciously, as these days, that is a smart thing to be doing.
You are welcome.
When we talk about creeping Islam and Stealth Jihad this is just one of the real live possibilities of how we are allowing Jihadists to silently, invisibly position themselves in our every day lives and in the most critical places to negatively impact our infrastructure and etc. should SHTF so they will be better able to undermine this country.
Doesn't this accurately describe our situation today?
Well, how shocked are you to realize we have done little to address these conditions since this was published in 2005?
Fitzgerald: Islam for Infidels, Part One
Hugh Fitzgerald Jan 13, 2005 at 2:25pm Uncategorized
Here is Part One of “Islam for Infidels,” a new three-part series by Jihad Watch Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald. (Part 2 is
here, the first section of Part 3 is
here, and the rest of Part 3 is
here.)
"...Never before in history has one civilization allowed large numbers of those who come from an alien, and immutably hostile situation, to settle deep within that first civilization’s borders.
Never before have the members of one civilization failed to investigate, and even willfully refused to investigate, or to listen to those who warn about, the consequences for all non-Muslims of the belief-system of Islam.
In history, the phenomenon of the Barbarians at the Gates is hardly new. Those barbarians lay siege; if they win, they enter in triumph. Should they lose, the advanced civilization survives.
But never before have the gates been opened, to an entering force that has not even been identified or understood.
Never before have the inhabitants of the by-now vulnerable city made efforts not to recognize, or realize, what they have done, and what they have undone.
That demographic intrusion shows no signs of diminishing. The systematic building of mosques and madrasas, paid for by Saudi Arabia, everywhere in the Western world, helps to make the conduct of Muslim life easier.
Western populations have been trained to make much of “celebrating diversity” and “promoting difference” and constructing, on a base of militant but unexamined pluralism, an edifice of legal rights and entitlements.
These rights, these entitlements, this militant pluralism are exploited by Muslims who do not believe in pluralism.
Nor do they accept the individual rights of conscience and free speech, the legal equality of men and women, and of religious and racial minorities, recognized, for example, in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Their current claim to support pluralism is based on the need to protect, and increase the power of, the Muslim umma, or Community, within the West, until such time as that umma no longer needs to pretend to have any interest in Western pluralism and Western values."
You are being redirected...