Should the USA occupy the UK?

[ShahdagMountains]

Nylons and chocolates for you to your heart's desire!!!

Greg

Over fed
Over paid
Over sexed

And….over here.

 

[gtopa1]

Instead of resorting to 80 year old stereotype quips , you ought to dedicate yourself to finding out exactly what is going on at Pine Gap in the middle of your desert .

Completely US funded with many US personnel .
And if you think it is just the biggest info gathering site on the planet , you have barely scratched the surface .

Loose lips sink ships!!!



Greg

 

[luiza]

Loose lips sink ships!!!

Planks or rivets here in civilisation . Unless you meant Clips but did not notice the typo .

Yes , Pine Gap is ca. 12 miles south west of Alice Springs . Report back before Xmas if possible .

 

[gtopa1]

Planks or rivets here in civilisation . Unless you meant Clips but did not notice the typo .

Yes , Pine Gap is ca. 12 miles south west of Alice Springs . Report back before Xmas if possible .

Yes; you are a plank.

Greg

 

[gtopa1]

Planks or rivets here in civilisation . Unless you meant Clips but did not notice the typo .

Yes , Pine Gap is ca. 12 miles south west of Alice Springs . Report back before Xmas if possible .

You are very limited!!!

Greg

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Yes; you are a plank.
View attachment 1078040

Greg

Plank of the Week.

A Friday night treat.

 

[fncceo]

Should the USA occupy the UK?​

The last time we did that we knocked up all their wives and moms in exchange for Hershey bars.

 

[gtopa1]

The last time we did that we knocked up all their wives and moms in exchange for Hershey bars.

Evidently they said something in Brisbane about that; didn't go down well.

Battle of Brisbane - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

An inglorious day for all involved imo.

Greg

 

[whitehall]

The U.K. should occupy the U.K. The Brits had their shot at independence when the first King Charles was beheaded but they would not tolerate self government and called back Charles's son from exile. What the country formerly known as England should do is kick out the current monarchy and sell the crown jewels.

 

[DonGlock26]

Let's play the game. Just a pure intellectual exercise, nothing real about it.

Let's imagine, that Russia and the USA has achieved mutually acceptable solution over situation in Europe. But this solution isn't really acceptable for Kievan regime and ruling regime of the UK.

American president officially demanded from his NATO "allies" don't spoil his plan, and keep the lines. Britain, also openly and officially refused to follow American orders, and, after short but furious escalation in Baltic sea - officially declared war to Russia. British Toffs and some "regime-essensial personell" left the cities and sheltered (also, they have concealed from ten to twenty 100 kt warheads somewhere in their shelters and British cities).

Obviously, Russia by a single warhead destroyed HMNB Clyde in Scotland with two (of three) Vanguard-class submarines and [unsuccessfully] tried to eliminate the last Vanguard in the sea. No civilian losses, few thousands of British soldiers and sailors are killed and injured.

Russian government suggested "humanitarian pause" (during which both sides refrain from nuking cities and can evacuate larger part population from them) and suggested peace negotiations, including demands of British neutrality and de-nuclearisation (with Americans forces as "guarantee" of safety of the UK). And said, that for every Russian city - seven British cities will be destroyed.


British government refused and ordered to the last Vanguard all-out attack against Saint Petersbourg (for one Vanguard's salvo can't overwhelm Moscow's ABD). Saint-Petersbourg is covered with S-400, but five 100 kt warheads got through. The population is partly evacuated, partly sheltered, but civilian losses are quite terrible - like, say, fifty thousand are dead and two hundred thousand are injured.
Russian government immediately ordered retaliation strike against seven largest British cities (save from London), for the population wasn't sheltered it means millions of killed civilians. Russia demanded unconditional surrender of London's regime (with further public execution of its leaders) total international occupation of the former United Kingdom, searching for concealed nuked to prevent further nuclear terrorism.

The United States may be a part of the humanitarian occupation forces if they want it or even lead them as long as they don't try to use post-war Britain against Russia.

The choices for the USA:
1) Attack Russian Federation (first of all its nuclear forces). In overoptimistic scenario it means death of at least fifty million of Americans (and lost of the US international leading position), in the pessimistic one - total extinction of Americans (and, may be, destruction of the Western civilization and The Dark Ages for Humanity).
2) Neutrality. The USA just make few steps back, evacute US personnel and US citizens and allow Brits and Russians kill each other. It will lead to death of millions of Brits (and, may be, their total extinction) and thousands of Russians, medium risk of British nuclear terrorism in American cities.
3) The US forces (may be, with the help of international community and local British people) overwhelm British King, publically execute the limited number of British war criminals, help British people to alleviate the consequences of the nuclear strikes. For the cultural and linguistic similarity between American and British people it won't be another Iraq or Vietnam.

Pakistan is already occupying the UK.