Should the US provide enough long-range weaponry to cut off the Russian supply lines and drive them out of Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm interested in knowing how support for Ukraine does on this bulletin board so please vote.
I support Ukraine. Russia would never have attacked, to reclaim Ukrainian territory, if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet, in exchange for security, assured by the US, UK, and Russia.
We know how little trust to put in Russian agreements, and have always known. Now it looks like Ukraine bet wrong, depending on the US, also, with Donny at the helm.
 
I support Ukraine. Russia would never have attacked, to reclaim Ukrainian territory, if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet, in exchange for security, assured by the US, UK, and Russia.
We know how little trust to put in Russian agreements, and have always known. Now it looks like Ukraine bet wrong, depending on the US, also, with Donny at the helm.
if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet,
that happened in1994.

What does 'donny' have to do with it?
 
I support Ukraine. Russia would never have attacked, to reclaim Ukrainian territory, if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet, in exchange for security, assured by the US, UK, and Russia.
Ding, ding, ding!!! Giving up their nukes was a monumentally bad decision, even though i am glad that they did. Just because a president in 1993 liked you and would protect you, doesnt mean the same thing will happen in 2025. Things always change.
 
I support Ukraine. Russia would never have attacked, to reclaim Ukrainian territory, if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet, in exchange for security, assured by the US, UK, and Russia.
We know how little trust to put in Russian agreements, and have always known. Now it looks like Ukraine bet wrong, depending on the US, also, with Donny at the helm.
You should not believe anything you are told. The Ukrainian nukes were worthless for Ukraine and only valuable for Russia. Like the American nukes that Germany has, only the Russians had the codes required to arm the Ukrainian bombs.
 
Do you? Why aren't you or they over there if you're truly this invested in this mess. Not one more dime. Let the dictators kill each other.
You got to be kidding; how old are you? I'm old enough that I would be no benefit to the Ukrainians; not only would I not be a benefit I wouldn't even be an impediment I'd be a burden. There was a time when I went off to war to kill communists to defend freedom, but unfortunately those days are behind me now. I can still work a little, but it's all downhill from here.
 
that happened in1994.

What does 'donny' have to do with it?
Kind of like the shrinking dollar, eh? The word of the United States is not what it used to be? All we really wanted was control of the Nukes and then defenseless, all bets off, no matter what international laws broken?

Are you saying you support the right of Russia to go into other countries and take territory, including any country we have security agreements with?

Do you think for a minute, Russia would have attacked, if facing the 3rd largest nuclear power on earth, right on her border. We set them up for this.
 

Should the US provide enough long-range weaponry to cut off the Russian supply lines and drive them out of Ukraine​


Of course.
 
I support Ukraine. Russia would never have attacked, to reclaim Ukrainian territory, if we had not brokered the deal for Ukraine to give up the 3rd largest nuclear weapons inventory on the planet, in exchange for security, assured by the US, UK, and Russia.
We know how little trust to put in Russian agreements, and have always known. Now it looks like Ukraine bet wrong, depending on the US, also, with Donny at the helm.

Wow!

You couldn't be any wronger if you tried

WOW!

Where do you get your "information"?
 
Ding, ding, ding!!! Giving up their nukes was a monumentally bad decision, even though i am glad that they did. Just because a president in 1993 liked you and would protect you, doesnt mean the same thing will happen in 2025. Things always change.
Why? They only ask us for material support, not troops, to defend against Russia, a known international pariah, attacking to conquer their country. Early on, we committed more to the effort, but the trend presently is more support coming from the European Union, with overall US $128 billion (.55% GDP) and European Union $124 Billion, the largest Non US contributors by GDP being Germany (1.31% GDP,
UK (.93% GDP) and Canada (.67% GDP). Ukraine has supplied all the bodies and boots on the ground in their defense. If we give Ukraine to Russia, which country will they want next? If we had not disarmed Ukraine, with assurances, Russia would never have attacked, but not Trump want to walk away.
 
Why? They only ask us for material support, not troops, to defend against Russia, a known international pariah, attacking to conquer their country. Early on, we committed more to the effort, but the trend presently is more support coming from the European Union, with overall US $128 billion (.55% GDP) and European Union $124 Billion, the largest Non US contributors by GDP being Germany (1.31% GDP,
UK (.93% GDP) and Canada (.67% GDP). Ukraine has supplied all the bodies and boots on the ground in their defense. If we give Ukraine to Russia, which country will they want next? If we had not disarmed Ukraine, with assurances, Russia would never have attacked, but not Trump want to walk away.
There is no winning scenario. Just endless conflict.
 
Why? They only ask us for material support, not troops, to defend against Russia, a known international pariah, attacking to conquer their country. Early on, we committed more to the effort, but the trend presently is more support coming from the European Union, with overall US $128 billion (.55% GDP) and European Union $124 Billion, the largest Non US contributors by GDP being Germany (1.31% GDP,
UK (.93% GDP) and Canada (.67% GDP). Ukraine has supplied all the bodies and boots on the ground in their defense. If we give Ukraine to Russia, which country will they want next? If we had not disarmed Ukraine, with assurances, Russia would never have attacked, but not Trump want to walk away.
We could send them a trillion dollars, it wont win the war for them. They cannot win that war, period. Continuing that war is a waste of money and a waste of human life. If Russia thinks for one second that Ukraine was about to retake their Donbas port, they would immediately launch nuclear missiles, and not one nation on Earth would do a damn thing about it, other than give them sanctions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom