Better than a ****** lover.
He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦spicyip.com
You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
mmmmm...my feels too...mmmm...that post touched me.
But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
Consternation huh? You defending a known liar, and thief (plagiarist), a known womanizer, and rape enabler...causes ME consternation?But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
Nope. Keep it up. Add a monument next to it for all the babies murdered by abortion.
What Martin Luther King actually thought about homosexuality - LifeSite
The LGBT movement loves to claim the 'civil rights' flag. What would MLK have to say about that?www.lifesitenews.com
Apparently, MLK was against homosexuality.
So should his monument be taken down?
What Martin Luther King actually thought about homosexuality - LifeSite
The LGBT movement loves to claim the 'civil rights' flag. What would MLK have to say about that?
Apparently, MLK was against homosexuality.
So should his monument be taken down?
What Martin Luther King actually thought about homosexuality - LifeSite
The LGBT movement loves to claim the 'civil rights' flag. What would MLK have to say about that?
Apparently, MLK was against homosexuality.
So should his monument be taken down?
MLK was an academic phony. America is not changing like you think.But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
Liberal whites are cutting their now throats. I hope Hollywood is the first to get some violence?Consternation huh? You defending a known liar, and thief (plagiarist), a known womanizer, and rape enabler...causes ME consternation?But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
I long to watch whites like you consumed in waves of fury as your blacks pets consume you.
Git tae fuck!
NoWhat Martin Luther King actually thought about homosexuality - LifeSite
The LGBT movement loves to claim the 'civil rights' flag. What would MLK have to say about that?
Apparently, MLK was against homosexuality.
So should his monument be taken down?
MLK was an academic phony. America is not changing like you think.But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
Sure. Loser.MLK was an academic phony. America is not changing like you think.But you know every word of it is true. And that causes you much consternation. Itās a changing world, and youāre scared. Donāt worry, youāll be okay, and the world will keep changing. You stay inside and keep your doors locked.You words are vacuous, babble...they say nothing and only provide an emotional opinion. You ignore the facts as you are a pitiful, white, cuck.He was a womanizing ****** who plagiarized his 'PhD'. He was a fraud, a womanizer, and a rape enabler. You are a thoroughly brainwashed slave.
"Kingās academic career contains a well-documented litany of plagiarism, and has been the subject of much literature. His most egregious breach of the academic code of conduct was in his doctoral thesis at Boston University, found to be identical in several respects to a dissertation submitted to the same university earlier by another student named Jack Boozer. In fact, some authors have even characterised Kingās conduct as piracy (paywall). Kingās plagiarism was later acknowledged by the University, but his doctorate was never revoked because his thesis still made āan intelligent contribution to scholarshipā. Such an assessment appears extremely suspect ā the evidence on record points to Kingās thesis being neither ground-breaking in its approach nor creative in its substantiation. In fact, Ralph Luker, who conducted extensive research for the Martin Luther King Papers Project, posits that Kingās academic success relied, in large part, on his habit of distilling the views of authorities in the subject and submitting them to the professors who held these authorities in high esteem. If this is true, then itās very hard to justify the Universityās decision ā is there a clause in their plagiarism policy that says āNone of this applies if you become a cultural iconā? "
Whose Dream Was It Anyway? Plagiarism and Martin Luther King Jr.
If you had to compile a list of events that shaped American, and even world history in the last century, Martin Luther King, Jr.ās āI have a dreamā speech would certainly rank high. Itās got all thā¦
Your attempt at character assassination falls woefully short. None of that is verifiable and relies solely on conjecture, but put all that aside and just look at what the man did.
Furthermore, read his views on the Vietnam War, and how brutally honest, insightful, and factual they were, and then look at what he was called by the Washington Post, TIME magazine, Newsweek, and other leading publications of the day. A traitor, a communist, all of them attacked him for saying the truth, he was so far ahead of his time. His accomplishments speak for themselves, they don't need dubious sources trying to attack his academic credentials with unverified nonsense.
And, it really doesn't matter, as one can judge this man by his actions, and they represent something that goes beyond the nationalism or the flawed legalities of this country, they go to the very heart of humanity.
Oh yes it is, and you and yours are impotent to stop it. And this makes you angry, and you lash out as society evolves, and racist, inbred douchebags are left to wallow in their double wide trailers and bark at the moon in agonized howls.
