Should president Trump have cordial relationships with dictators? See discussion

[Donald H]

Why not?

I really don't know what you are saying. That Trump should not even attempt to help end this war?

Don't pretend to be thick Rowley. Trump might even not attempt, on account of him most likely being informed ahead of time that the US military will cause heads to roll.

America must not lose to the Brics alliance and Russia is the other superpower that's a part of it.

 

[22lcidw]

Or we could try stopping evil when we see it.

Here's an easy one for you.

Just replace "Putin" with "Hitler" and "Ukraine" with "Czechoslovakia" in these conversations, and you realize how stupid they sound.

(This is the part where you bring up Ashlit Babbit because you have no other ideas!)

It is expensive to try to rule the whole world. Look what happened when Russia first entered the middle east then left and we then went there. Around January of 1991 we started in earnest. Although we were there for many years before. And we spent the money and spent some more. Dead soldiers and men coming home with parts missing and psyche issues. And we have little to show for it. Now we are stuck there at some representation. This is a dangerous game putting our soldiers on the doorstep with Russia, which has claims to Ukraine in its history. A buffer zone is prudent and logical.

 

[Rawley]

Don't pretend to be thick Rowley. Trump might even not attempt, on account of him most likely being informed ahead of time that the US military will cause heads to roll.

America must not lose to the Brics alliance and Russia is the other superpower that's a part of it.

Not trying to be thick, but you are all over the place. You say "Trump had the task of setting it right" and in the next breath you say "Trump sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong."

 

[Donald H]

Not really. The problem is that we’ve been unwilling to fuck back. On September 18, 2001 Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan should have glowed green.

Understand the MAD concept or stay the fk out of the adults' discussions.

It's the reason why all the world's superpowers are still friends who have agreed on limitations to wars.

 

[Anathema]

Understand the MAD concept or stay the fk out of the adults' discussions.

It's the reason why all the world's superpowers are still friends who have agreed on limitations to wars.

I understand NAD. I also understand that I can’t fear a weapon I know my opponent won’t use. No point in having a gun if you won’t pull the trigger.

The “superpowers” are all COWARDS. The last 80 years have proven that.

 

[toobfreak]

Should president Trump have cordial relationships with dictators?​

YES, unless you are Lez Cheney. A cordial relationship is the best and only relationship you want to have with a dictator so as to keep the lines of communication open and diplomacy in force to avoid going to war. So long as the two parties are still TALKING, you can have some influence in their actions (or inactions).

 

[luiza]

If you're trying to join the discussion? The threat is in Trump interfering in the war against Russia. If Russia's alliance with China continues, America goes to the back seat.

America is there whether you like it or not ,and whether you accept it or not .

America had its chance and has been found badly wanting .

 

[Foxfyre]

You're getting it all right but one important issue. The US military won't allow Trump to interfere in the war. How is it that any American can ignore the fact that winning against Russia is the culmination of US foreign policy of over 80 years?

The U.S. military will have their say but they will not be the final word if Trump is re-elected. And I'm pretty sure he will appoint military leaders who share his desire for world peace.

 

[BackAgain]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

To paraphrase President Kennedy:

We should never negotiate out of fear, but we should never fear to negotiate.

But if a President can’t even speak cordially with some foreign leader (including offensive scum and dictators), then how can he even begin to negotiate?

 

[Robert W]

YES, unless you are Lez Cheney. A cordial relationship is the best and only relationship you want to have with a dictator so as to keep the lines of communication open and diplomacy in force to avoid going to war. So long as the two parties are still TALKING, you can have some influence in their actions (or inactions).

Excellent.

 

[Robert W]

Trump departs from the RINOs and Democrats in his belief that not talking to dictators/enemies generally accomplishes nothing. If you don't talk to them, how do you ever reach an agreement that is good for both sides? What right do we have to tell them how to run their country and then say they have no right to tell us how to run ours? We can oppose their methods/mindset without having to go to war to do that. But we won't change their ways by being self righteous and demanding. Best to do it by setting a good example.

The Trump doctrine looks for win-win situations for all and avoid armed conflict. His doctrine gave us the closest thing to world peace any of us have ever experienced in our lifetimes. Had he won in 2020, I am quite confident we would still be enjoying world peace as well as a hell of a lot more prosperity.

I don't argue with that kind of positive success.

I gave you the winning trophy because what you say is really brilliant. Thank you.

 

[Robert W]

(This is the part where you bring up Ashlit Babbit because you have no other ideas!)

OK, this is why!!! You claim to be against evil. However you support the evil cop who murdered Ashli Babbitt. Think of Hitler having innocents killed off.

 

[JoeB131]

Trump departs from the RINOs and Democrats in his belief that not talking to dictators/enemies generally accomplishes nothing. If you don't talk to them, how do you ever reach an agreement that is good for both sides? What right do we have to tell them how to run their country and then say they have no right to tell us how to run ours? We can oppose their methods/mindset without having to go to war to do that. But we won't change their ways by being self righteous and demanding. Best to do it by setting a good example.

The Trump doctrine looks for win-win situations for all and avoid armed conflict. His doctrine gave us the closest thing to world peace any of us have ever experienced in our lifetimes. Had he won in 2020, I am quite confident we would still be enjoying world peace as well as a hell of a lot more prosperity.

I don't argue with that kind of positive success.

Um, Trump doesn't talk to dictators.... he swoons when they praise his fragile ego. So Putin got pretty much everything he wanted and so did Kim. Xi didn't play that game because he didn't have to, China is already eating our lunch.

 

[JoeB131]

Trump's intentions are clear, but there's no way he can even get close to offering terms for peace.

America made the decision under Biden's presidency to go to the culmination of all of it's 40 wars of aggression. But it was a bad decision.

Now Trump had the task of setting it right.

That's when America gets serious about Trump sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong.

Don't forget, he knows that his own country is responsible for starting the war. Biden's big mistake!

No, guy, the war started because Putin decided to violate the Minsk Accords and try to topple Ukraine's government.

Stop trying to rewrite history for your daily borscht ration, and get Putin's dick out of your mouth.

 

[JoeB131]

OK, this is why!!! You claim to be against evil. However you support the evil cop who murdered Ashli Babbitt. Think of Hitler having innocents killed off.

Um, the people Hilter killed weren't trying to murder members of the Reichstag because they didn't like the way the election turned out.

Babbit was a stupid woman and died in a stupid way.

 

[JoeB131]

Don't pretend to be thick Rowley. Trump might even not attempt, on account of him most likely being informed ahead of time that the US military will cause heads to roll.

America must not lose to the Brics alliance and Russia is the other superpower that's a part of it.

The BRICs aliance is a joke, man. China and India hate each other. Brazil is pretty much trying to get back in the West's good graces.

 

[Robert W]

Babbit was a stupid woman and died in a stupid way.

So you do approve police brutality and not allowing women to be on trial.

 

[Robert W]

The BRICs aliance is a joke, man. China and India hate each other. Brazil is pretty much trying to get back in the West's good graces.

Some posts make it appear you are intelligent. Then you write things out showing you are not.

 

[JoeB131]

So you do approve police brutality and not allowing women to be on trial.

She was part of an angry mob endangering Congress. The officer acted appropriately, as two reviews have found.

Some posts make it appear you are intelligent. Then you write things out showing you are not.

All your posts make you look like a brain dead Mormon.

YOu couldn't even refute my point. BRICs are "China and a bunch of poor countries."

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

Unfortunately, warmongers always try to control the discussion by saying that diplomacy is, "a sign of weakness" or that you're working with the enemy and that we need to, "confront" whatever country we have issues with. Always been that way. Back in Vietnam, for instance, if you supported peace you'd be accused of being a RUSSIAN AGENT (never got old). Or if you were opposed to carpet bombing the Arabs then you're, "SOFT ON TERROR." Of course, they never specify what EXACTLY "confrontation" entails because that might lead to an uncomfortable discussion where they have to confront the public with the fact that they're gonna go die like animals while they hang out in their air conditioned office.

Edit: Don't forget that war is makes huge money for the rich, and is great for political approval ratings.