Should president Trump have cordial relationships with dictators? See discussion

[Robert W]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

 

[jwoodie]

Understanding your opponent is the key to victory.

 

[Donald H]

Putin isn't a dictator, but there's still a big threat with Trump's romance with Putin.

That has caused the US military to make preparations to save America's chances in the war against Russia.

The war against Russia will not be compromised!

It's the biggest consideration on the world's foreign policy by far!

 

[Crepitus]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

If (highly unlikely) he manages to cheat his way into office he needs to understand the difference between a "cordial relationship" and pretending they are his favorite microphone stand.

 

[Crepitus]

Putin isn't a dictator

On what planet is that true?

 

[Robert W]

If (highly unlikely) he manages to cheat his way into office he needs to understand the difference between a "cordial relationship" and pretending they are his favorite microphone stand.

He cheated his way into the office but recently announced he won't be president again.

 

[Lesh]

On what planet is that true?

You have to understand Donald is a Kremlin troll

 

[Donald H]

On what planet is that true?

America has been dictating it's terms on wars of aggression for 80 years at least.

But it's started a war that it can no longer dictate progress.

Do you think that assassinating Putin would help America's cause, or would it become even worse?

Putin is considered to be the world's most clever leader of a country, and Lavrov could be even more clever.

That's the reason why the world is banking on Trump! LOL

Does an American president have any say in foreign policy?

 

[Donald H]

You have to understand Donald is a Kremlin troll

They only understand that discussion on the war against Russia is unacceptable now.

There's just no satisfactory answers.

Or is there?

 

[Rawley]

Putin isn't a dictator, but there's still a big threat with Trump's romance with Putin.

That has caused the US military to make preparations to save America's chances in the war against Russia.

The war against Russia will not be compromised!

It's the biggest consideration on the world's foreign policy by far!

What's the "threat" if Trump doesn't call Putin a "pure thug” and “murderous dictator?”

​

 

[Donald H]

What's the "threat" if Trump doesn't call Putin a "pure thug” and “murderous dictator?”

​

If you're trying to join the discussion? The threat is in Trump interfering in the war against Russia. If Russia's alliance with China continues, America goes to the back seat.

 

[Anathema]

I’m of the opinion that our leaders should not be communicating with foreigner leaders at all except to send the message… “fuck with our country and yours won’t exist anymore.”

 

[JoeB131]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

Or we could try stopping evil when we see it.

Here's an easy one for you.

Just replace "Putin" with "Hitler" and "Ukraine" with "Czechoslovakia" in these conversations, and you realize how stupid they sound.

(This is the part where you bring up Ashlit Babbit because you have no other ideas!)

 

[Rawley]

If you're trying to join the discussion? The threat is in Trump interfering in the war against Russia. If Russia's alliance with China continues, America goes to the back seat.

God forbid he tries to broker a peace and people stop dying, huh?

 

[Donald H]

I’m of the opinion that our leaders should not be communicating with foreigner leaders at all except to send the message… “fuck with our country and yours won’t exist anymore.”

That's the point Ana, any superpower fucking around with another superpower finds out. What used to be your comfort has sailed out of sight when America fkd around with the wrong enemy.

 

[Foxfyre]

Watch the discussion about this in this video. Dr. Phil comments as does Tulsi Gabbard. We do not mean take vacations with dictators, we mean keep dictators not ready to bomb the USA or open up WW3 with the world. Think about yourself. If a person is angry, should you make them more angry or should you calm them down?

Trump departs from the RINOs and Democrats in his belief that not talking to dictators/enemies generally accomplishes nothing. If you don't talk to them, how do you ever reach an agreement that is good for both sides? What right do we have to tell them how to run their country and then say they have no right to tell us how to run ours? We can oppose their methods/mindset without having to go to war to do that. But we won't change their ways by being self righteous and demanding. Best to do it by setting a good example.

The Trump doctrine looks for win-win situations for all and avoid armed conflict. His doctrine gave us the closest thing to world peace any of us have ever experienced in our lifetimes. Had he won in 2020, I am quite confident we would still be enjoying world peace as well as a hell of a lot more prosperity.

I don't argue with that kind of positive success.

 

[Anathema]

That's the point Ana, any superpower fucking around with another superpower finds out. What used to be your comfort has sailed out of sight when America fkd around with the wrong enemy.

Not really. The problem is that we’ve been unwilling to fuck back. On September 18, 2001 Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan should have glowed green.

 

[Donald H]

God forbid he tries to broker a peace and people stop dying, huh?

Trump's intentions are clear, but there's no way he can even get close to offering terms for peace.

America made the decision under Biden's presidency to go to the culmination of all of it's 40 wars of aggression. But it was a bad decision.

Now Trump had the task of setting it right.

That's when America gets serious about Trump sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong.

Don't forget, he knows that his own country is responsible for starting the war. Biden's big mistake!

 

[Rawley]

Trump's intentions are clear, but there's no way he can even get close to offering terms for peace.

Why not?

America made the decision under Biden's presidency to go to the culmination of all of it's 40 wars of aggression. But it was a bad decision.

Now Trump had the task of setting it right.

That's when America gets serious about Trump sticking his nose in where it doesn't belong.

Don't forget, he knows that his own country is responsible for starting the war. Biden's big mistake!

I really don't know what you are saying. That Trump should not even attempt to help end this war?

 

[Donald H]

Trump departs from the RINOs and Democrats in his belief that not talking to dictators/enemies generally accomplishes nothing. If you don't talk to them, how do you ever reach an agreement that is good for both sides? What right do we have to tell them how to run their country and then say they have no right to tell us how to run ours? We can oppose their methods/mindset without having to go to war to do that. But we won't change their ways by being self righteous and demanding. Best to do it by setting a good example.

The Trump doctrine looks for win-win situations for all and avoid armed conflict. His doctrine gave us the closest thing to world peace any of us have ever experienced in our lifetimes. Had he won in 2020, I am quite confident we would still be enjoying world peace as well as a hell of a lot more prosperity.

I don't argue with that kind of positive success.

You're getting it all right but one important issue. The US military won't allow Trump to interfere in the war. How is it that any American can ignore the fact that winning against Russia is the culmination of US foreign policy of over 80 years?