Should Marje read legislation or just do as she is told ?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2016
Messages
54,781
Reaction score
24,942
Points
2,300
Location
Y Cae Ras

This criticism of the Georgia divorcee seems harsh.
Repub;ican women should not get sassy except before bedtime. A few moochers in her district are going to die but so what ?

Marje did her duty and rubber stamped trumps madness. Thats what she was elected to do. And she did it like a trooper.

All this leftist carping needs to stop so that this maga princess can get on with her job of signing anything she is told to sign.
 

This criticism of the Georgia divorcee seems harsh.
Repub;ican women should not get sassy except before bedtime. A few moochers in her district are going to die but so what ?

Marje did her duty and rubber stamped trumps madness. Thats what she was elected to do. And she did it like a trooper.

All this leftist carping needs to stop so that this maga princess can get on with her job of signing anything she is told to sign.
I mean, the left didn't necessarily oblige Nancy Pelosi to read Obamacare, did they?

"We have to read it to see what's in it."

Naw. What was good for Nancy is good for anyone else, if we're going to use leftist logic.
 
Low educated electorate.
Example 1,798,320,401 of why the left lost the election.

Call the voters unintelligent and/or stupid.

The lack of self-awareness is mind-blowing. Go on, please, keep doing it. The left won't win the presidency for a generation with that tactic.

Furthermore, they'll just ignore leftist Britons hurling insults from afar.
 
Last edited:
All this leftist carping needs to stop so that this maga princess can get on with her job of signing anything she is told to sign.
She's one of the more hateful, aggressive, hypocritical and spectacularly ignorant members of today's GQP.

For that, she'll always have a warm and special place in MAGA's heart.
 
Example 1,798,320,401 of why the left lost the election.

Call the voters unintelligent and/or stupid.

The lack of self-awareness is mind-blowing. Go on, please, keep doing it. You won't win the presidency for a generation with that tactic.
I have seen a singular emphasis on insulting voters, seemingly thinking that will somehow drive more of them to vote for democrats.
 
Reagan was right.

No bill should be more than 10 pages.

  • Criticism of a 1,057-page bill: In a 1988 radio address, Reagan described a 1,057-page bill that weighed 14 pounds and arrived late. He stated that he would not sign such a bill again and received bipartisan support.
  • Criticism of bundling appropriations into one bill: In 1987, when signing a large bill combining various appropriations, Reagan stated that wrapping up the entire legislative business into thousand-page bills on the eve of Christmas was not the proper way to do business.
  • Politicians may not scrutinize long bills: Some sources suggest that politicians may not fully scrutinize long, complex bills.

If a separate idea is in it, it's a different bill.

The way the bills work now is like the The Pentagon Wars movie.

Everyone wants to add THEIR touch to add to a good bill, turning it into shit.
Because there is no way their "Touch" would pass by itself.
So they force politicians to vote for...............SHIT.
 
Reagan was right.

No bill should be more than 10 pages.

  • Criticism of a 1,057-page bill: In a 1988 radio address, Reagan described a 1,057-page bill that weighed 14 pounds and arrived late. He stated that he would not sign such a bill again and received bipartisan support.
  • Criticism of bundling appropriations into one bill: In 1987, when signing a large bill combining various appropriations, Reagan stated that wrapping up the entire legislative business into thousand-page bills on the eve of Christmas was not the proper way to do business.
  • Politicians may not scrutinize long bills: Some sources suggest that politicians may not fully scrutinize long, complex bills.

If a separate idea is in it, it's a different bill.

The way the bills work now is like the The Pentagon Wars movie.

Everyone wants to add THEIR touch to add to a good bill, turning it into shit.
Because there is no way their "Touch" would pass by itself.
It also allows partisans to scream, "He voted to <fill in nefarious plot here>", when the choice was to vote for a bill that contained a multitude of necessary items and a handful of bad ones, or to vote against the handful of bad items and lose the good ones. It's a political game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom