Should illegal aliens, be allowed to own guns in the USA?

[Bassman007]

Well since we don't actually enforce immigration laws and just about any other law why should we enforce firearm laws against them.

Good question, I will answer this because you are retarded like the rest of your friends.

Vote for Freedom and safety for all. Vote Trump in 2016.

 

[HappyJoy]

Well since we don't actually enforce immigration laws and just about any other law why should we enforce firearm laws against them.

Good question, I will answer this because you are retarded like the rest of your friends.

Vote for Freedom and safety for all. Vote Trump in 2016.

What does this have to do with your thread?

 

[Desperado]

Seriously you have to ask?
Absolutely not, To own a gun legally the illegal alien must register the gun at which point the illegal alien should be arrested and deported.
The two cannot exist together without the government ignoring its own law

 

[kaz]

Note this is a trick question designed to scramble liberal brains, because now they have to say yes, illegal aliens should be able to own guns, just Americans have no right to own those same guns.

Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk

No, actually you’ve demonstrated the stupidity common to most on the right.

Everyone is in agreement that those undocumented should be designated as prohibited persons, consistent with Second Amendment jurisprudence, including ‘liberals.’

Ok we have a moron on the line. So you are saying that undocumented persons who enter the USA from countries that host ISIS fighters bent on destroying western society, need to be allowed to own guns in the USA.

Dude you lose.

But don't stop because you are funnier than a Down Syndrome kid picking his nose and eating it in Wendy's.

Or was that you?

At least you’re consistent at being wrong.

See post 18.

And given your posting history – this thread included – you’re in no position to refer to others as ‘moron.’

Position or not, he nailed it

 

[kaz]

Seriously you have to ask?
Absolutely not, To own a gun legally the illegal alien must register the gun at which point the illegal alien should be arrested and deported.
The two cannot exist together without the government ignoring its own law

You mean like would happen if they apply for a drivers license or financial aid at a university?

 

[Bassman007]

Seriously you have to ask?
Absolutely not, To own a gun legally the illegal alien must register the gun at which point the illegal alien should be arrested and deported.
The two cannot exist together without the government ignoring its own law

And illegal people register anything legally?

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Could non-citizens actually purchase firearms in this country? I don't know how the law is worded but if it says 'citizen' then the background checks only apply to citizens of the United States. I wonder if the ACLU will take up that case or would they be to conflicted between taking up a gun case and and illegal person case.

 

[SuperDemocrat]

Seriously you have to ask?
Absolutely not, To own a gun legally the illegal alien must register the gun at which point the illegal alien should be arrested and deported.
The two cannot exist together without the government ignoring its own law

I never really thought of that before. The government ignoring its own law... I just assumed that the government naturally chose not to enforce whatever laws it thought wasn't 'cool' or something.

 

[Bassman007]

Well since we don't actually enforce immigration laws and just about any other law why should we enforce firearm laws against them.

Good question, I will answer this because you are retarded like the rest of your friends.

Vote for Freedom and safety for all. Vote Trump in 2016.

What does this have to do with your thread?

Were their guns owned legally?

Does your brain compute logically, or do you just spout what they told you to babble?

Los Zetas Drug Cartel Linked to US Helicopter Downing

So babble on kiddie

 

[Wilbur Right]

What's really funny is that the op seems to think the only way for illegals to get a gun in this country is legally. LMAO.

 

[HappyJoy]

Could non-citizens actually purchase firearms in this country? I don't know how the law is worded but if it says 'citizen' then the background checks only apply to citizens of the United States. I wonder if the ACLU will take up that case or would they be to conflicted between taking up a gun case and and illegal person case.

The ACLU has defended Rush Limbaugh.

Well since we don't actually enforce immigration laws and just about any other law why should we enforce firearm laws against them.

Good question, I will answer this because you are retarded like the rest of your friends.

Vote for Freedom and safety for all. Vote Trump in 2016.

What does this have to do with your thread?

Were their guns owned legally?

Does your brain compute logically, or do you just spout what they told you to babble?

Los Zetas Drug Cartel Linked to US Helicopter Downing

So babble on kiddie

Your thread is about 'illegal aliens' buying guns.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Note this is a trick question designed to scramble liberal brains, because now they have to say yes, illegal aliens should be able to own guns, just Americans have no right to own those same guns.

Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk

Is it legal for a person residing illegally in a country to own a fire arm legally?

Is this what you mean?

But, according to the Dems, they aren't 'illegal', just 'undocumented'

Ok if they are undocumented, is it legal for undocumented Mexicans and Iranians to legally own guns in the USA.

Either the answer is yes, or no. If the answer is no, then the liberals are treating people based upon their race which is illegal.

I was being sarcastic.

Some people believe if they don't sound illegal, it will be harder to prosecute them.

I was not being sarcastic, is it legal to treat Mexicans who enter the USA differently than Iranians or Russians who enter the USA illegally. If a liberal answers yes and grants some concession to Mexicans, then the liberal democrat is a racist.

Hillary could not answer this question anyhow or anyway. She would babble even more than normal.

Actually you’re being ignorant.

LPRAs have the same Second Amendment right to possess a firearm as US citizens.

No ‘concession’ is being ‘granted’ to a Mexican citizen who enters the US legally and is known to DHS.

An Iranian or Russian who enters the country illegally is a prohibited person because he is not known to DHS, cannot be subject to a background check, where any criminal record or mental health issue would go undetected during a firearm purchase.

Again, those undocumented are prohibited from possessing a firearm having nothing whatsoever to do with their race or national origin – there is neither ‘discrimination’ nor ‘racism’ taking place because all undocumented immigrants are being treated equally in accordance with the law.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

No, people in violation of immigration laws should not be allowed to own guns. Whether they are Mexican, Iranian or Irish.

What was the trick question?

The ‘trick’ is on the OP, actually.

 

[HappyJoy]

No, people in violation of immigration laws should not be allowed to own guns. Whether they are Mexican, Iranian or Irish.

What was the trick question?

The ‘trick’ is on the OP, actually.

That's what happens when someone who doesn't understand the difference between race and citizenship thinks they know something.

 

[Bassman007]

What's really funny is that the op seems to think the only way for illegals to get a gun in this country is legally. LMAO.

That is not the point goofy, they came here with their guns and their drugs, that were sold to your neighbors kids. The point is that Hillary accepts this as a rational way for America to behave toward it's children. She is wrong.

 

[Bassman007]

No, people in violation of immigration laws should not be allowed to own guns. Whether they are Mexican, Iranian or Irish.

What was the trick question?

The ‘trick’ is on the OP, actually.

Ifm yu sey soo, U R wey tu smertz fer mee

 

[Liquid Reigns]

Illegals are illegal. They have no rights other than to a trial for their crime.

federal law says no

but the 7th circuit says yes they do

The 7th Circuit doesn't say yes they do, Chief Judge Wood says that if they can show a substantial attachment to this country, that they may have some rights.

we see first that Meza-Rodriguez was in the United States
voluntarily; there is no debate on this point. He still has ex-
tensive ties with this country, having resided here from the
time he arrived over 20 years ago at the age of four or five
until his removal.​

Wood then goes on to cite Plyler,

In
Plyler v. Doe,
457 U.S. 202
(1982), which
Verdugo-Urquidez
left undisturbed, the Court
addressed the status of unauthorized aliens as “persons” for
constitutional purposes: ​

Which limits Constitutional Protections as she states. She argues that the "right to bear arms" is not unlimited, it is a permissible restriction of Congress to limit.

This being key, they haven't touched upon the actual right of an illegal to actually posses a firearm, Wood's simply states Congress can restrict whom they desire and the courts need not go any further.

Meza-Rodriguez’s ability to invoke the Second Amend-
ment does not resolve this case, however, because the right
to bear arms is not unlimited. See
Heller
, 554 U.S. at 595.
Congress may circumscribe this right in some instances
without running afoul of the Constitution, and so we must
now decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) is such a permissi-
ble restriction. ​

So the 7th Circuit doesn't say he has a right to own or posses a firearm, they state that Congress can limit who can own and posses.

Congress’s interest in prohibiting persons who are diffi-
cult to track and who have an interest in eluding law en-
forcement is strong enough to support the conclusion that 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) does not impermissibly restrict Meza-
No. 14-3271
17
Rodriguez’s Second Amendment right to bear arms. We thus
A
FFIRM
the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss. ​

 

[Moonglow]

What's really funny is that the op seems to think the only way for illegals to get a gun in this country is legally. LMAO.

That is not the point goofy, they came here with their guns and their drugs, that were sold to your neighbors kids. The point is that Hillary accepts this as a rational way for America to behave toward it's children. She is wrong.

Who's kids bought drugs brought from Illegals?

 

[Bassman007]

What's really funny is that the op seems to think the only way for illegals to get a gun in this country is legally. LMAO.

That is not the point goofy, they came here with their guns and their drugs, that were sold to your neighbors kids. The point is that Hillary accepts this as a rational way for America to behave toward it's children. She is wrong.

Who's kids bought drugs brought from Illegals?

HookedAZ: Tracking Heroin’s Hold on Arizona Everyone is someone's child........... I pray for you

 

[eagle7_31]

Note this is a trick question designed to scramble liberal brains, because now they have to say yes, illegal aliens should be able to own guns, just Americans have no right to own those same guns.

Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk

No they should not. they should not be voting either, but that will happen to.