Zone1 Should false religions be banned?

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

sure you do ...

View attachment 1143788

using the 4th century christian bible - what could go wrong.

do you always ignore recorded history to promote your unwarranted pleasantries.

as fleeing europe and christianity to seek the new world - free from religious persecution.

.


Are you saying that my church tortures people today?





.

 

[ding]

you're a liar ... who uses their phony religion, christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

You are a moron.

 

[BreezeWood]

Are you saying that my church tortures people today?

if they are desert dwellers - yes ... they are using false commandments claimed heavenly to persecute and victimize the innocent - the desert bibles are all three forgeries.

it why christianity is excluded from the u s gov't by its constitution - the truth is obvious.

 

[BreezeWood]

You are a moron.

you're a liar ... who uses their phony religion, christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

zzzzz

 

[ding]

zzzzz

You are a moron.

 

[BreezeWood]

You are a moron.

you're a liar ... who uses their phony religion, christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

zzzz - yes their false religion, christianity all three desert religions must be banned for legitimate religions to prosper without interference from the crucifiers. zing - opjq.

 

[ding]

zzzz - yes their false religion, christianity all three desert religions must be banned for legitimate religions to prosper without interference from the crucifiers.

You are a moron.

 

[BreezeWood]

You are a moron.

you're a liar ... who uses their phony religion, christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

zzzz - the crucifiers exclusion from the u s gov't by their crimes against humanity, christianity - all three desert religions of forgeries and fallacies.

 

[BackAgain]

all three desert religions and their false commandments are forgeries and should be required in the liest to acknowledge their deceptions or remove them from their bibles.

Let’s talk about your trite use of the term “desert religions.” Hers the thing: STFU.

And who is going to do this “requiring” you speak of? A law? Despite the First Amendment’s very clear guarantee?

This thread is typical of the crap spewed by the original poster. But you shouldn’t jump in feet first to endorse his nonsense.

 

[ding]

zzzz - the crucifiers exclusion from the u s gov't by their crimes against humanity, christianity - all three desert religions of forgeries and fallacies.

I don’t argue with morons. There’s no point in it. Run along.

 

[BreezeWood]

all three desert religions and their false commandments are forgeries and should be required in the liest to acknowledge their deceptions or remove them from their bibles.

And who is going to do this “requiring” you speak of? A law? Despite the First Amendment’s very clear guarantee?

those who will bring the crucifiers and their lies to justice - the 1st century events, liberation theology, self determination as taught by who they crucified.

there is nothing special about freedom of religion any different than any other subject matter - than religion that is prohibited to being a part of the gov't due to their history of persecution and victimization of the innocent.

 

[BreezeWood]

I don’t argue with morons. There’s no point in it. Run along.

that's you hater, a crucifier using the phony title of christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

 

[BothWings]

Who gets to choose? Most of them have been at least a little full of shit at some point in their evolution, IMO.

 

[BreezeWood]

judaism is a religion of lies ... and forgeries.

God gave Moses the first set of stone tablets on Mount Sinai, and they were inscribed with the Ten Commandments, written by God himself.

there were never tablets etched in the heavens as claimed by moses - used to deceive the innocent to worship the liar and their phony commandments - that never existed.

 

[ding]

that's you hater, a crucifier using the phony title of christianity to persecute and victimize the innocent.

Run along. I don’t argue with morons.

 

[westwall]

If one reads a religious source text, such as the Bible, in its entirety, one can see that many religious groups and adherents have based their beliefs off of a small part of it, but that it is often taken out of context or misinterpreted, while being ignorant of the whole, and therefore, in my view, false.

If we could compare the specific religious beliefs of individual adherents or groups, and show that they bear little resemblance to the entirety of the source text they claim to have originated from, I would consider them false religions.

It'd therefore be in favor of stripping them of their protected status under the law, if not outright banning them in some cases, in order to preserve true religion which is authentic to its source texts and prevent it from being corrupted.

As an example, the cult known as the Westboro Baptist Church is heretical to the Bible and the theology of John Calvin - ignoring most of it, particularly God and Christ's emphasis on love, and simply takes bits and pieces out of context to justify existence. Therefore, I'd be tempted to argue that they shouldn't qualify for religious protection under the law and that it should be legal for the state to ban them.

Define "false religion"

 

[BackAgain]

those who will bring the crucifiers and their lies to justice - the 1st century events, liberation theology, self determination as taught by who they crucified.

there is nothing special about freedom of religion any different than any other subject matter - than religion that is prohibited to being a part of the gov't due to their history of persecution and victimization of the innocent.

Kinda incoherent, but, to the extent you’re making any grammatical sense, it seems like you’re saying freedom of religion isn’t special. And that’s a very stupid thing to believe. But it is also a contradiction:

The thread premise is that maybe it ought to be only the “false” religions that get prohibited. The other ones deserve protection? Hm.

Who makes those decisions? And how do they get around that pesky 1st Amendment?

 

[NotYankee]

Who would be the judge? Would they have alternative motives to eliminate certain religions? Could you trust them? Many interpret scripture in various different ways. Who is to say which interpretation is correct? Sounds like a dangerous precedent to allow a group of fallible men to outlaw certain religions.

"Who would be the judge"" Good question onefout;

Anyone remember the "heritics" burned to death by Janet Reno and President Clinton at Waco Texas?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

if they are desert dwellers - yes ... they are using false commandments claimed heavenly to persecute and victimize the innocent - the desert bibles are all three forgeries.

it why christianity is excluded from the u s gov't by its constitution - the truth is obvious.

.

Nope.

But entertaining try.





.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

zzzzz

.

Translation -- "I've got no facts to back up my reactionary screed. Quit picking on me."




.