Should Alt Right voices be silenced?

[JustAGuy1]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

 

[progressive hunter]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

no such thing as alt right,,

 

[eagle7-31]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

The looney left wants to silence any opposition. There are not many genuine liberals left.

 

[scruffy]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

If YOU deem them as misinformation you are free to ignore them.

 

[JustAGuy1]

no such thing as alt right,,

Of course there is, I am one of them.

 

[whitehall]

Silence voices? Am I still on an American forum?

 

[JustAGuy1]

Where and who is silencing?

Did you not listen to Joe assholes speech?

 

[deannalw]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

No- misinformation or not.

 

[fncceo]

no such thing as alt right,,

I belong to CTRL-ALT-DELETE

 

[deannalw]

Sinister!

 

[JGalt]

Of course there is, I am one of them.

Pleased to meet you. Guess I'd be one of those too.

 

[LeftofLeft]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

No voice should be silenced. The whole concept of silencing and justifying as “misinformation” can be classified as nothing less than fascist.

 

[johngaltshrugged]

The "alt-right" is just conservatives & America First people that know the GOP establishment are pathetic RINOs that play the part of controlled opposition in the DC UNiparty kabuki Theatre to keep the masses distracted, divided & gaslighted.

The only way to silence us would be through violence & we own most of the private guns.

They can't silence us without kicking off a Civil War

 

[BWK]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

No! Misinformation is meant for one thing. To inform with real information. At some point, they'll eat cake with their own misinformation.

 

[Esdraelon]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

No voices that are not specifically calling for violence need to be silenced. Sharing ideas is not an evil unto itself even if those ideas may be evil. People have free choice. When you begin to see a government silencing people, that government has become irredeemably corrupt and needs to be resisted.

 

[occupied]

To a Trumpbot "silenced" means someone called them out on their bullshit.

 

[Esdraelon]

Where and who is silencing?

You are unaware of the censorship being done by the social media corporations? Or do you agree with them and see no problem? The accounts that are silenced are nearly always conservative voices.

 

[occupied]

You are unaware of the censorship being done by the social media corporations? Or do you agree with them and see no problem? The accounts that are silenced are nearly always conservative voices.

That's capitalism.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If you deem them as misinformation should their voices be silenced?

No voice should be silenced as a matter of government regulatory policy inconsistent with First Amendment jurisprudence.

In the context of private society, not subject to First Amendment case law, private citizens are at liberty to oppose and condemn speech and political advocacy where such opposition and condemnation does not constitute ‘silencing’ any voice or viewpoint.

 

[JustAGuy1]

IM2 says he will "end me".