Shades Of Nazi Germany: Biden Wants Americans To Report / Turn In 'Radicalized' Friends And Family To His Govt

[colfax_m]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

 

[bodecea]

Just pretend he was talking about Muslims and y’all would be throwing a parade.

Well, we know that no trump fluffer would ever turn in that D.C. would-be bomber.

 

[martybegan]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

 

[colfax_m]

No false narrative. I said downplaying. One day of a protest that got out of hand is the end of the world to you, but months of lefty violence is ignored.

You first said support. Then you started walking it back.

Because fundamentally this is a dishonest argument. It doesn’t need to be honest, it just needs to convince someone like yourself that your desire for violence against others is justified.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Your still in a tizzy over one day of a protest getting out of hand while ignoring ongoing leftist violence.

Like I said. It’s not an honest argument. Not only is there a gulf between supporting and ignoring, but you accuse me of both falsely.

It doesn’t need to be an honest argument. You’re only trying to convince yourself.

The Jan 6th “protest” isn’t just an isolated incident. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of a shift away from democratic institutions for the purposes of maintenance of power. Our country is strong, but this does actually represent some threat to the nation’s health.

it is an incredibly isolated incident. 1 day. no actual impact to any government process.

Meanwhile idiots in Seattle and Portland took neighborhoods hostage for MONTHS.

Like I said. It’s only a manifestation of the underlying retreat from democratic ideals.

It didn’t spring into existence spontaneously and the retreat is still going on.

Says the person who supports government overreach into all aspects of people's lives.

All you have is hyperbole.

And all you have is not denying what I am accusing you of.

Do I really have to deny that I don’t want government into all aspects of people’s lives?

I would respond to serious accusations but you’re not being serious. Hyperbole isn’t serious.

When you want the feds to determine the things you listed, that's what you want.

That doesn’t even make sense.

I don’t want the feds controlling who gets married. I’m just happy that the states aren’t allowed to present same sex couples from getting married.

Saying you want limited government, but supporting intrusive state government isn’t being very honest.

That is the feds controlling who gets married. Even worse its a court doing it and not a legislature.

The decision should have just made States recognize any marriage license issued in another State just like they did before.

So Alabama wouldn't have to issue same sex marriage licenses, but they would have to recognize out of state ones like always.

When it comes to the 2nd amendment, your hypocrisy shows. In NYC you need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $400 to just keep a revolver in your house. How is that not infringement?

Allowing is not controlling.

Hypothetically if you want Alabama to determine that gay people can’t get married, and I don’t want them to have the power, between the two of us, I’m the one for a more limited government staying out of people’s business.

Forcing is controlling. The court forced Alabama to do something it didn't want to do.

Unless of course it's things like gun ownership keeping one's generated wealth and property rights.

Federal fiat is not limited government.

Okay. The court would also force Alabama to have probable cause and a warrant to search someone’s property.

But at the end of the day both of those actions would result in less intrusion into personal lives, not more.

Kinda like the difference between positive and negative rights.

 

[colfax_m]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

What do you mean your worldview “allows others”?

 

[martybegan]

No false narrative. I said downplaying. One day of a protest that got out of hand is the end of the world to you, but months of lefty violence is ignored.

You first said support. Then you started walking it back.

Because fundamentally this is a dishonest argument. It doesn’t need to be honest, it just needs to convince someone like yourself that your desire for violence against others is justified.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Your still in a tizzy over one day of a protest getting out of hand while ignoring ongoing leftist violence.

Like I said. It’s not an honest argument. Not only is there a gulf between supporting and ignoring, but you accuse me of both falsely.

It doesn’t need to be an honest argument. You’re only trying to convince yourself.

The Jan 6th “protest” isn’t just an isolated incident. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of a shift away from democratic institutions for the purposes of maintenance of power. Our country is strong, but this does actually represent some threat to the nation’s health.

it is an incredibly isolated incident. 1 day. no actual impact to any government process.

Meanwhile idiots in Seattle and Portland took neighborhoods hostage for MONTHS.

Like I said. It’s only a manifestation of the underlying retreat from democratic ideals.

It didn’t spring into existence spontaneously and the retreat is still going on.

Says the person who supports government overreach into all aspects of people's lives.

All you have is hyperbole.

And all you have is not denying what I am accusing you of.

Do I really have to deny that I don’t want government into all aspects of people’s lives?

I would respond to serious accusations but you’re not being serious. Hyperbole isn’t serious.

When you want the feds to determine the things you listed, that's what you want.

That doesn’t even make sense.

I don’t want the feds controlling who gets married. I’m just happy that the states aren’t allowed to present same sex couples from getting married.

Saying you want limited government, but supporting intrusive state government isn’t being very honest.

That is the feds controlling who gets married. Even worse its a court doing it and not a legislature.

The decision should have just made States recognize any marriage license issued in another State just like they did before.

So Alabama wouldn't have to issue same sex marriage licenses, but they would have to recognize out of state ones like always.

When it comes to the 2nd amendment, your hypocrisy shows. In NYC you need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $400 to just keep a revolver in your house. How is that not infringement?

Allowing is not controlling.

Hypothetically if you want Alabama to determine that gay people can’t get married, and I don’t want them to have the power, between the two of us, I’m the one for a more limited government staying out of people’s business.

Forcing is controlling. The court forced Alabama to do something it didn't want to do.

Unless of course it's things like gun ownership keeping one's generated wealth and property rights.

Federal fiat is not limited government.

Okay. The court would also force Alabama to have probable cause and a warrant to search someone’s property.

But at the end of the day both of those actions would result in less intrusion into personal lives, not more.

Kinda like the difference between positive and negative rights.

That's actually not only in the Federal Constitution but Alabama's as well.

Please show me in the Constitution where gay people can marry, or where marriage is actually defined.

 

[martybegan]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

What do you mean your worldview “allows others”?

Current leftism is based on only your side being "right", and thus all other views must be suppressed.

 

[colfax_m]

No false narrative. I said downplaying. One day of a protest that got out of hand is the end of the world to you, but months of lefty violence is ignored.

You first said support. Then you started walking it back.

Because fundamentally this is a dishonest argument. It doesn’t need to be honest, it just needs to convince someone like yourself that your desire for violence against others is justified.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Your still in a tizzy over one day of a protest getting out of hand while ignoring ongoing leftist violence.

Like I said. It’s not an honest argument. Not only is there a gulf between supporting and ignoring, but you accuse me of both falsely.

It doesn’t need to be an honest argument. You’re only trying to convince yourself.

The Jan 6th “protest” isn’t just an isolated incident. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of a shift away from democratic institutions for the purposes of maintenance of power. Our country is strong, but this does actually represent some threat to the nation’s health.

it is an incredibly isolated incident. 1 day. no actual impact to any government process.

Meanwhile idiots in Seattle and Portland took neighborhoods hostage for MONTHS.

Like I said. It’s only a manifestation of the underlying retreat from democratic ideals.

It didn’t spring into existence spontaneously and the retreat is still going on.

Says the person who supports government overreach into all aspects of people's lives.

All you have is hyperbole.

And all you have is not denying what I am accusing you of.

Do I really have to deny that I don’t want government into all aspects of people’s lives?

I would respond to serious accusations but you’re not being serious. Hyperbole isn’t serious.

When you want the feds to determine the things you listed, that's what you want.

That doesn’t even make sense.

I don’t want the feds controlling who gets married. I’m just happy that the states aren’t allowed to present same sex couples from getting married.

Saying you want limited government, but supporting intrusive state government isn’t being very honest.

That is the feds controlling who gets married. Even worse its a court doing it and not a legislature.

The decision should have just made States recognize any marriage license issued in another State just like they did before.

So Alabama wouldn't have to issue same sex marriage licenses, but they would have to recognize out of state ones like always.

When it comes to the 2nd amendment, your hypocrisy shows. In NYC you need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $400 to just keep a revolver in your house. How is that not infringement?

Allowing is not controlling.

Hypothetically if you want Alabama to determine that gay people can’t get married, and I don’t want them to have the power, between the two of us, I’m the one for a more limited government staying out of people’s business.

Forcing is controlling. The court forced Alabama to do something it didn't want to do.

Unless of course it's things like gun ownership keeping one's generated wealth and property rights.

Federal fiat is not limited government.

Okay. The court would also force Alabama to have probable cause and a warrant to search someone’s property.

But at the end of the day both of those actions would result in less intrusion into personal lives, not more.

Kinda like the difference between positive and negative rights.

That's actually not only in the Federal Constitution but Alabama's as well.

Please show me in the Constitution where gay people can marry, or where marriage is actually defined.

You missed the point.

Refusing to allow the government to do something is objectively an act which decreases government involvement in our lives.

 

[colfax_m]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

What do you mean your worldview “allows others”?

Current leftism is based on only your side being "right", and thus all other views must be suppressed.

And “rightism” (or whatever) doesn’t believe only their side being right?

 

[Lastamender]

Just pretend he was talking about Muslims and y’all would be throwing a parade.

Have you killed any white people today? Your Reich is depending on you.

I mourn the loss of rational Americans. Trump has broken so many people in this country.

You prefer Americans who cannot think for themselves? How many people have you turned in yet? 10, 20, more?

 

[colfax_m]

You prefer Americans who cannot think for themselves? How many people have you turned in yet? 10, 20, more?

I prefer people who don’t want to enact political change through violence.

I don’t know anyone like that but if you do, hopefully you are able to notify authorities before someone gets hurt.

 

[martybegan]

No false narrative. I said downplaying. One day of a protest that got out of hand is the end of the world to you, but months of lefty violence is ignored.

You first said support. Then you started walking it back.

Because fundamentally this is a dishonest argument. It doesn’t need to be honest, it just needs to convince someone like yourself that your desire for violence against others is justified.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Your still in a tizzy over one day of a protest getting out of hand while ignoring ongoing leftist violence.

Like I said. It’s not an honest argument. Not only is there a gulf between supporting and ignoring, but you accuse me of both falsely.

It doesn’t need to be an honest argument. You’re only trying to convince yourself.

The Jan 6th “protest” isn’t just an isolated incident. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of a shift away from democratic institutions for the purposes of maintenance of power. Our country is strong, but this does actually represent some threat to the nation’s health.

it is an incredibly isolated incident. 1 day. no actual impact to any government process.

Meanwhile idiots in Seattle and Portland took neighborhoods hostage for MONTHS.

Like I said. It’s only a manifestation of the underlying retreat from democratic ideals.

It didn’t spring into existence spontaneously and the retreat is still going on.

Says the person who supports government overreach into all aspects of people's lives.

All you have is hyperbole.

And all you have is not denying what I am accusing you of.

Do I really have to deny that I don’t want government into all aspects of people’s lives?

I would respond to serious accusations but you’re not being serious. Hyperbole isn’t serious.

When you want the feds to determine the things you listed, that's what you want.

That doesn’t even make sense.

I don’t want the feds controlling who gets married. I’m just happy that the states aren’t allowed to present same sex couples from getting married.

Saying you want limited government, but supporting intrusive state government isn’t being very honest.

That is the feds controlling who gets married. Even worse its a court doing it and not a legislature.

The decision should have just made States recognize any marriage license issued in another State just like they did before.

So Alabama wouldn't have to issue same sex marriage licenses, but they would have to recognize out of state ones like always.

When it comes to the 2nd amendment, your hypocrisy shows. In NYC you need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $400 to just keep a revolver in your house. How is that not infringement?

Allowing is not controlling.

Hypothetically if you want Alabama to determine that gay people can’t get married, and I don’t want them to have the power, between the two of us, I’m the one for a more limited government staying out of people’s business.

Forcing is controlling. The court forced Alabama to do something it didn't want to do.

Unless of course it's things like gun ownership keeping one's generated wealth and property rights.

Federal fiat is not limited government.

Okay. The court would also force Alabama to have probable cause and a warrant to search someone’s property.

But at the end of the day both of those actions would result in less intrusion into personal lives, not more.

Kinda like the difference between positive and negative rights.

That's actually not only in the Federal Constitution but Alabama's as well.

Please show me in the Constitution where gay people can marry, or where marriage is actually defined.

You missed the point.

Refusing to allow the government to do something is objectively an act which decreases government involvement in our lives.

Depends on the level of government and who or what is doing what to who or what.

State governments were forced to issue SSM licenses against their will. A better compromise would have just been to force them to accept out of State licenses as always and let them evolve on their own at their own pace when it comes to issuance.

 

[struth]

Xiden and the Dems moving us one step closer and closer to the National Socialist

 

[martybegan]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

What do you mean your worldview “allows others”?

Current leftism is based on only your side being "right", and thus all other views must be suppressed.

And “rightism” (or whatever) doesn’t believe only their side being right?

They don't believe they are the only side. You don't see rightists as a mass pushing for silencing others like you do on the left.

 

[Lastamender]

You prefer Americans who cannot think for themselves? How many people have you turned in yet? 10, 20, more?

I prefer people who don’t want to enact political change through violence.

I don’t know anyone like that but if you do, hopefully you are able to notify authorities before someone gets hurt.

That is exactly what the summer riots did. Those people are on your side. You get dumber every day.

 

[martybegan]

You prefer Americans who cannot think for themselves? How many people have you turned in yet? 10, 20, more?

I prefer people who don’t want to enact political change through violence.

I don’t know anyone like that but if you do, hopefully you are able to notify authorities before someone gets hurt.

Bullshit. you support the lefty "protesters" who continue to this day to interfere with normal government actions.

Hmmm: Minneapolis law enforcement dismantles Uptown "autonomous zone," arrests demonstrators

 

[colfax_m]

No false narrative. I said downplaying. One day of a protest that got out of hand is the end of the world to you, but months of lefty violence is ignored.

You first said support. Then you started walking it back.

Because fundamentally this is a dishonest argument. It doesn’t need to be honest, it just needs to convince someone like yourself that your desire for violence against others is justified.

Six of one, half dozen of the other.

Your still in a tizzy over one day of a protest getting out of hand while ignoring ongoing leftist violence.

Like I said. It’s not an honest argument. Not only is there a gulf between supporting and ignoring, but you accuse me of both falsely.

It doesn’t need to be an honest argument. You’re only trying to convince yourself.

The Jan 6th “protest” isn’t just an isolated incident. It’s just the most obvious manifestation of a shift away from democratic institutions for the purposes of maintenance of power. Our country is strong, but this does actually represent some threat to the nation’s health.

it is an incredibly isolated incident. 1 day. no actual impact to any government process.

Meanwhile idiots in Seattle and Portland took neighborhoods hostage for MONTHS.

Like I said. It’s only a manifestation of the underlying retreat from democratic ideals.

It didn’t spring into existence spontaneously and the retreat is still going on.

Says the person who supports government overreach into all aspects of people's lives.

All you have is hyperbole.

And all you have is not denying what I am accusing you of.

Do I really have to deny that I don’t want government into all aspects of people’s lives?

I would respond to serious accusations but you’re not being serious. Hyperbole isn’t serious.

When you want the feds to determine the things you listed, that's what you want.

That doesn’t even make sense.

I don’t want the feds controlling who gets married. I’m just happy that the states aren’t allowed to present same sex couples from getting married.

Saying you want limited government, but supporting intrusive state government isn’t being very honest.

That is the feds controlling who gets married. Even worse its a court doing it and not a legislature.

The decision should have just made States recognize any marriage license issued in another State just like they did before.

So Alabama wouldn't have to issue same sex marriage licenses, but they would have to recognize out of state ones like always.

When it comes to the 2nd amendment, your hypocrisy shows. In NYC you need to wait 3-6 months and pay over $400 to just keep a revolver in your house. How is that not infringement?

Allowing is not controlling.

Hypothetically if you want Alabama to determine that gay people can’t get married, and I don’t want them to have the power, between the two of us, I’m the one for a more limited government staying out of people’s business.

Forcing is controlling. The court forced Alabama to do something it didn't want to do.

Unless of course it's things like gun ownership keeping one's generated wealth and property rights.

Federal fiat is not limited government.

Okay. The court would also force Alabama to have probable cause and a warrant to search someone’s property.

But at the end of the day both of those actions would result in less intrusion into personal lives, not more.

Kinda like the difference between positive and negative rights.

That's actually not only in the Federal Constitution but Alabama's as well.

Please show me in the Constitution where gay people can marry, or where marriage is actually defined.

You missed the point.

Refusing to allow the government to do something is objectively an act which decreases government involvement in our lives.

Depends on the level of government and who or what is doing what to who or what.

State governments were forced to issue SSM licenses against their will. A better compromise would have just been to force them to accept out of State licenses as always and let them evolve on their own at their own pace when it comes to issuance.

Not really. It doesn’t matter what level of government, restricting their authority reduces their power over people.

That’s what happened with same sex marriage. It got the government out of the business of telling gay couples they couldn’t do something. It extended freedoms to people that were being denied it by the “will” of the state government.

 

[colfax_m]

Bullshit. you support the lefty "protesters" who continue to this day to interfere with normal government actions.

Yet again, you accuse me of supporting something without any reason to. It’s really boring, Marty. You’re just trolling again.

 

[okfine]

Just pretend he was talking about Muslims and y’all would be throwing a parade.

Have you killed any white people today? Your Reich is depending on you.

I mourn the loss of rational Americans. Trump has broken so many people in this country.

They are not Americans.

 

[colfax_m]

Way to be a butthurt wuss.

Nah. Just it’s nice when you reveal who you are.

Or who I project. That's what idiots like you never get. My persona changes based on who I am replying to.

Since I have zero respect for you and idiots like bertie, you get what you get.

You’re a troll. That’s not a projection. The very fact that you’re projecting it makes you a troll.

I troll YOU and morons like you. That's all you deserve.

Yep. Fragile egos like yourself really get triggered when people challenge your beliefs.

Hence the trolling.

Responding with disdain is not being triggered. Try using the words right.

I’d say you go well over disdain and into unhinged violent fantasy territory.

That’s definitely triggered behavior.

You would be wrong.

I don’t think you’re a very objective judge of your own triggered behavior. Especially given your reflexive hatred of those you consider to behave in a similar way.

You can’t accept that you are like the people you hate. It’s protecting your own world view, and has that has a very strong capacity to deceive yourself.

I hate lying controlling SJW losers like you. Anger in the face of tyranny is no vice, complacency in the face of tyranny is no virtue.

My worldview allows others as long as they accept the validity of other worldviews, yours does not.

What do you mean your worldview “allows others”?

Current leftism is based on only your side being "right", and thus all other views must be suppressed.

And “rightism” (or whatever) doesn’t believe only their side being right?

They don't believe they are the only side. You don't see rightists as a mass pushing for silencing others like you do on the left.

What? Who believes they’re the “only side”? That doesn’t make sense. I know there are plenty of sides to all sorts of issues. And I know that some of them are objectively wrong and I think that some of them are subjectively (in my opinion) wrong.

And so do you.

But you want to see the right going after the “other side”, just look at their collective freak out of critical race theory.