syonidv
VIP Member
You're deluding yourself, sir. The assertion that oil would continue to trade in US dollars, or that the greenback would remain as the world reserve currency... beam me up, Scotty.You state "US invading itself", but that isn't what's being supposed.Spoken by a man who elects to spend his valuable time trolling blue sky conspiracy threads. You'll forgive me if I don't take your criticism too seriously.The point of the thread isn't to prove the theory, it's to call attention to the Jade Helm exercise in the context of the theory. If a threat fails to materialize, the OP moves on. If relevant new developments become known, the OP adds them to corpus of evidence and systematically builds a case.
That's what the skeptical cohort in this thread doesn't get. Conspiracy theories are exercises in open-minded "blue sky" hypotheses. They aren't presented as rigorous atomic theories, nor are they intended to be.
The difference between legitimate criticism and trolling is the quality of the counterarguments. Legitimate criticism avoids ad hominems, attacks specific contentions, and acknowledges the limited scope and fungible nature of the theory. Trolling is a bunch of gradeschool boys assailing an implausible theory with cheap jokes because they recognize the implausibility but they don't comprehend the nature of the exercise.
In short, you're missing the point and wasting your time. You're not adding anything to the discussion. Some posters are outright bullying, hiding behind the same old tired excuses that the OP 'deserves it'.
If the theory doesn't interest you, get out of the thread. Find something that does. Spend your time on something constructive.
An obviously learned person with scrambled eggs for brains. Man....people are interesting.
Why not engage these threads as a matter of academic curiosity? Keep an open mind, willingly suspend one's disbelief, and contemplate "Is it possible?", "How would it happen?", "What is my threshold for genuine concern?"
That's what I take away from these threads. They're collages of theories and 'what ifs' in a conspiratorial mindset. I could only wish the trolls were as eager to properly debunk the theories as they are to bully the OP.
As a matter of academic curiosity, this is a poorly formed conspiracy. The evidence supporting it is virtually non-existent. Its contradicted by history, where similar operations have been conducted for many years without mythic 'reverse coupes'. Its needlessly and pointlessly complicated. Where a training excercise both matches the evidence perfectly, has historic precident, and is far simpler. Occam's razor cuts this conspiracy to ribbons.
Then there's the aspects of secrecy. Where this vast operation to take over the United States is being kept in perfect secrecy with no one involved spilling the beans. The US government is ridiculously porous. The likelihood of this occuring, especially when so many military personnel are involved is roughly that number that comes just before zero.
Then there is implementation. There is 0.0% chance that the military is going to follow an order to take over the United States. Straight up refusal would start with the lowest E-1 and work its way up from there. Adding yet another layer of comic implausibility to a towering cake of the stuff.
Even the premise is bone stupid: the US invading *itself*? As an exercise of academic curiosity, it insults my intelligence.
It is by the governor of Texas.
As presented, the scenario is a future economic collapse, which occurs "naturally" and independent of the military, leading to a situation of grave political instability in the US. Consider modern-day Greece or Italy as examples.
Many people are under the impression that a collapse will be a simple, relatively painless affair, but such is a happy fiction. A US government default will wipe out pensions, endowments, money markets, municipal assets, social programs. Generally speaking, the US will be plunged into chaos, with businesses and government at all levels unable to function, leading to widespread discontent, rioting, and a period of economic "austerity" that will make the Great Depression look tame by comparison.
You're wildly overstating the effects of a default. Most pensions aren't based exclusively on Treasury bonds. Neither are most endowments, money markets, municipal assets, or social programs. Even if we see a free fall in the US dollar's value on the international exchange markets, it would only effect our ability to buy goods from outside the US. Since Oil is still traded in petrodollars, we'd be insulated from a fair portion of these effects for oil. All intranational goods and services would also be protected from much the same issues.
Further, a collapse in the dollar's value would be a manufacturing bonanza. As goods made in the US would be a comparative bargain. The Chinese artificially depress the value of their currency for exactly this reason.
So your doomsday scenario is a sad fiction. Yet another layer of implausibility on an already fantastically complicated and elaborate conspiracy.
Oh, and we're not close to a default. Which again, nixes the entire silly conspiracy yet again.

Regardless, I'm not going to debate macroeconomic realities with you in the middle of a conspiracy thread. The good news--if you can call it that--is that reality will prove one of us right in the not-too-distant future. If your blind optimism pays off, you'll get no complaints from me.
As for Gov. Abbott's "belief" in an imminent takeover, the man is pandering to his base, giving Pres. Obama a big "eff you" and letting everyone know "Texas" regards his administration as dirt. I don't approve of it. I think the stunt will backfire on him. I also don't see how his political grandstanding is relevant to this thread.