Seriously, my theory is that liberals lack the IQ to understand capitalism...

[Brutus]

It's the one that sacred you shitless and made you run away, that will give you a clue of how far back to look.

of course if it existed you would love to point it out for the whole world to see. HOw will you learn if you are afraid to try? Do you want to be a liberal all your life??

 

[edthecynic]

It's the one that sacred you shitless and made you run away, that will give you a clue of how far back to look.

of course if it existed you would love to point it out for the whole world to see. HOw will you learn if you are afraid to try? Do you want to be a liberal all your life??

Except I already posted it in this very thread and everybody not only saw it, but they already saw you avoid it like the plague also!!!!!

 

[Brutus]

Except I already posted it in this very thread and everybody not only saw it, but they already saw you avoid it like the plague also!!!!!

I wonder then why the liberal liar is so afraid to post it again? What is he so afraid of??

 

[edthecynic]

Except I already posted it in this very thread and everybody not only saw it, but they already saw you avoid it like the plague also!!!!!

I wonder then why the liberal liar is so afraid to post it again? What is he so afraid of??

And I wonder why the CON$ervative liar, who lacks the IQ to understand Capitalism, still refuses to answer the post already made in this very thread?
You ran away from it in fear the first time I took the time to post it, why should I waste my time finding it and posting it again for someone too lazy to find it for themselves. I've already invested enough time in it, it's time you invested your own time, Slacker.

 

[Brutus]

Except I already posted it in this very thread and everybody not only saw it, but they already saw you avoid it like the plague also!!!!!

I wonder then why the liberal liar is so afraid to post it again? What is he so afraid of??

And I wonder why the CON$ervative liar, who lacks the IQ to understand Capitalism, still refuses to answer the post already made in this very thread?
You ran away from it in fear the first time I took the time to post it, why should I waste my time finding it and posting it again for someone too lazy to find it for themselves. I've already invested enough time in it, it's time you invested your own time, Slacker.

show me a conservative who is afraid to debate and uses cartoons instead!!!

 

[Toronado3800]

Did I see liberal anti monopoly law lovin Brutus ask for more problems with Friedman and that automatic negative tax idea a few pages back?

Its really an idealistic idea. Just like socialism it wont work though buddy. A good portion of the population needs a fear of failure.

Brutus, just dont resort to the name calling. Its pretty immature to label yourself or others by narrow names like "liberal" or "conservative". Few folks are purely one or the other.

 

[edthecynic]

Did I see liberal anti monopoly law lovin Brutus ask for more problems with Friedman and that automatic negative tax idea a few pages back?

Its really an idealistic idea. Just like socialism it wont work though buddy. A good portion of the population needs a fear of failure.

Brutus, just dont resort to the name calling. Its pretty immature to label yourself or others by narrow names like "liberal" or "conservative". Few folks are purely one or the other.

Now anti-monopoly is anti-Capitalism.

To maximize profits, Capitalism seeks to eliminate all competition. Capitalists try to drive the competition out of business. Failing that, a Capitalist will try to buy out the competition. One way or the other, by hook or by crook, a Capitalist tries to control the market.

 

[Old Rocks]

Haha...good work brother.
That's stumped their liberal arses!
Who's ever seen a liberal capitalist?...ridiculous!!!!

really? are you as stupid as you sound? just wondering...

bill gates
howard shultz
warren buffet
mark zuckerberg

do i need to go on or have you caught on yet?

A list of names does not demonstrate an understanding of capitalism? PLease try harder and ask Mom and Dad to help too.

If you, as a Conservative, have such a good understanding of capitalism, why are you not making the same kind of money as the people on the list, or, say, George Soros? If you were, you certainly would not be posting on this board

 

[Brutus]

really? are you as stupid as you sound? just wondering...

bill gates
howard shultz
warren buffet
mark zuckerberg

do i need to go on or have you caught on yet?

A list of names does not demonstrate an understanding of capitalism? PLease try harder and ask Mom and Dad to help too.

If you, as a Conservative, have such a good understanding of capitalism, why are you not making the same kind of money as the people on the list, or, say, George Soros?

it seems you you've got economics and business all confused in your head

[
If you were, you certainly would not be posting on this board

I'm sure its true that all of us here are making less than the billionaires on the list!!! And??????

Why not try to demonstrate an understanding of capitalism, or admit as a liberal you have no idea and so have nothing whatsoever to say about politics??

 

[Brutus]

Did I see liberal anti monopoly law lovin Brutus ask for more problems with Friedman and that automatic negative tax idea a few pages back?

Its really an idealistic idea. Just like socialism it wont work though buddy. A good portion of the population needs a fear of failure.

what???????????

[
Brutus, just dont resort to the name calling. Its pretty immature to label yourself or others by narrow names like "liberal" or "conservative". Few folks are purely one or the other.

the voting booth requires one or the other.

[
Now anti-monopoly is anti-Capitalism.

What???????????



To maximize profits, Capitalism seeks to eliminate all competition. Capitalists try to drive the competition out of business. Failing that, a Capitalist will try to buy out the competition. One way or the other, by hook or by crook, a Capitalist tries to control the market.[/QUOTE]

 

[edthecynic]

Now anti-monopoly is anti-Capitalism.

To maximize profits, Capitalism seeks to eliminate all competition. Capitalists try to drive the competition out of business. Failing that, a Capitalist will try to buy out the competition. One way or the other, by hook or by crook, a Capitalist tries to control the market.

What???????????

Not only do you lack the IQ to understand Capitalism, you lack the IQ to use the quote function properly!!!!!!

 

[Toronado3800]

Brutus, you gotta be able to understand the socialist aspects of the old Eisenhower era healthcare system, right?

 

[Brutus]

To maximize profits, Capitalism seeks to eliminate all competition.

completely stupid of course since we have much capitalism and much competition. Moreover, the less competition there is the more a new competitor is encouraged. See why we are positive a liberal will have a very low IQ??

Capitalists try to drive the competition out of business. Failing that, a Capitalist will try to buy out the competition. One way or the other, by hook or by crook, a Capitalist tries to control the market.

and the less competition there is the more competition is created!! Think about it over and over again. Why is there so much competition if capitalism destroys competition. In fact its communism, socialism and liberalism that destroys competition by making it illegal as libturds did with heatlh insurance for example, and as the soviets did with everything.

When the Red Chinese allowed competition people stoped dying of starvation!!

This is a huge huge day for you. If you want a reading list I'm all to happy to help. Thanks

 

[Toronado3800]

Brutus, you gotta be able to understand the socialist aspects of the old Eisenhower era healthcare system, right?

Too busy calling folks stupid while debating if companies in an unregulated capitalist system try to eliminate their competition?

Go do some reading about them liberal anti trust laws you supported a few posts back.

 

[Brutus]

Brutus, you gotta be able to understand the socialist aspects of the old Eisenhower era healthcare system, right?

Too busy calling folks stupid while debating if companies in an unregulated capitalist system try to eliminate their competition?

Go do some reading about them liberal anti trust laws you supported a few posts back.

what??????????

 

[Toronado3800]

Brutus, you gotta be able to understand the socialist aspects of the old Eisenhower era healthcare system, right?

Too busy calling folks stupid while debating if companies in an unregulated capitalist system try to eliminate their competition?

Go do some reading about them liberal anti trust laws you supported a few posts back.

what??????????

Which part do you find confusing?

A. Under the old healthcare system the poor and destitute showed up at the hospital and almost got the same treatment folks who actually had insurance got on the bill of those who had insurance. That seems simple enough.

B. Liberal "groundbreaking" anti trust - anti monopoly laws were needed after national corporations established monopolies. Earlier you acknowledged these laws were necessary and said these were a good idea, or do i recall improperly?

 

[edthecynic]

To maximize profits, Capitalism seeks to eliminate all competition.

completely stupid of course since we have much capitalism and much competition. Moreover, the less competition there is the more a new competitor is encouraged. See why we are positive a liberal will have a very low IQ??

Capitalists try to drive the competition out of business. Failing that, a Capitalist will try to buy out the competition. One way or the other, by hook or by crook, a Capitalist tries to control the market.

and the less competition there is the more competition is created!! Think about it over and over again. Why is there so much competition if capitalism destroys competition. In fact its communism, socialism and liberalism that destroys competition by making it illegal as libturds did with heatlh insurance for example, and as the soviets did with everything.

When the Red Chinese allowed competition people stoped dying of starvation!!

This is a huge huge day for you. If you want a reading list I'm all to happy to help. Thanks

Again you show that you lack the IQ to understand Capitalism. If you want to understand how Capitalism works, study the Rockefeller family and their oil monopoly.

We can see that the oil monopoly controls the price of gas, not supply and demand or any other market force. Right now supply is up and gas is higher priced now than when oil was over $145 a barrel. CON$ have already admitted without realizing it that the oil monopoly controls the price and not market forces when they said that if oil subsidies are ended the oil monopoly will just raise the price of gas to make up the lost subsidies.

If any independent tries to compete with the oil monopoly, the monopoly can undercut the price the independent charges until the independent can no longer stay in business. The monopoly can absorb a loss of revenue much longer than any independent oil company. Once the independent oil company is bankrupt or bought out by the monopoly, the monopoly jacks up the prices again.

 

[Brutus]

A. Under the old healthcare system the poor and destitute showed up at the hospital and almost got the same treatment folks who actually had insurance got on the bill of those who had insurance. That seems simple enough.

any idea what your point is??????????????

B. Liberal "groundbreaking" anti trust - anti monopoly laws were needed after national corporations established monopolies. Earlier you acknowledged these laws were necessary and said these were a good idea, or do i recall improperly?

so????????? what is your point???????????????

 

[Toronado3800]

A. Under the old healthcare system the poor and destitute showed up at the hospital and almost got the same treatment folks who actually had insurance got on the bill of those who had insurance. That seems simple enough.

any idea what your point is??????????????

B. Liberal "groundbreaking" anti trust - anti monopoly laws were needed after national corporations established monopolies. Earlier you acknowledged these laws were necessary and said these were a good idea, or do i recall improperly?

so????????? what is your point???????????????

Simple

Point A: the old system was socialist after the fact. The new system is socialist before the fact. The alternative is throwing the dying and poor out on the street like in the time of Jesus.

Point B: Just showing how even you like some liberal ideas and should not go around yelling "stupid" at ppl for being liberal. A side light is anti trust laws are something the founding fathers did not see the need for. The world changed. Most everyone liberally found some power the government had to regulate it just like now.

 

[Brutus]

Point A: the old system was socialist after the fact. The new system is socialist before the fact. The alternative is throwing the dying and poor out on the street like in the time of Jesus.

too stupid and perfectly liberal. The alternative is capitalism

Point B: Just showing how even you like some liberal ideas and should not go around yelling "stupid" at ppl for being liberal.

what?????????

A side light is anti trust laws are something the founding fathers did not see the need for. The world changed. Most everyone liberally found some power the government had to regulate it just like now.

what???????