Senator Josh Hawley states the obvious. DISTRICT judges cannot make NATIONAL rulings.

[StatesRightsForever]

89 federal district courts in the 50 states and their rulings should only apply in that district. That should be obvious. Can a city judge in columbus OH tell indianapolis what to do?

march 25 2025 Monday, on FNC’s “The Ingraham Angle,” Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to institute a moratorium on lower federal court judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions.
“Absolutely,” Hawley replied. “The key thing to do here, Laura, is to end the ability of these district courts to abuse their judicial authority by issuing the so-called nationwide injunctions. Laura, I don’t think they have that authority, properly speaking, under the Constitution Article 3, what they’re doing is they’re purporting these judges, they’re purporting to go out and to bind parties and individuals who aren’t before them. They’re purporting to bind people who aren’t in their district. We only have one Supreme Court that can bind the whole nation.”

He continued, “District courts aren’t supposed to be able to do it, and yet, President Trump has been subject already to 15 separate so-called nationwide injunctions. In his first term, Laura, there were 64. We have never seen anything like this in American history. It’s incredibly abusive, and Congress ought to end it, and we can’t end it by just saying no nationwide injunctions by these district courts.”

Hawley: End Federal District Courts' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

Monday, on FNC's "The Ingraham Angle," Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to institute a moratorium on lower federal court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

 

[konradv]

89 federal district courts in the 50 states and their rulings should only apply in that district. That should be obvious. Can a city judge in columbus OH tell indianapolis what to do?

Hawley: End Federal District Courts' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

Monday, on FNC's "The Ingraham Angle," Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to institute a moratorium on lower federal court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

MAGA lies.

 

[IM2]

So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.

 

[TimFitz]

89 federal district courts in the 50 states and their rulings should only apply in that district. That should be obvious. Can a city judge in columbus OH tell indianapolis what to do?

Hawley: End Federal District Courts' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

Monday, on FNC's "The Ingraham Angle," Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to institute a moratorium on lower federal court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

Josh Hawley is a joke. A member of the Jan 6 plot.

And someone who makes idiotic claims like this to keep the knuckledraggers entertained.

Besides, Congress cannot dictate the jurisdiction of the courts.

But the know nothings don’t understand that.

 

[bendog]

So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.

and maybe gop states shouldn't be forum shopping in Texass for right wing maga judges.

 

[konradv]

and maybe gop states shouldn't be forum shopping in Texass for right wing maga judges.

They never think that far ahead, like when the next hurricane hits and there’s no FEMA.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

the worst of these activist judges is James Emanuel Boasberg. With a name like that you know what country he really works for.

 

[StatesRightsForever]

So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.

His ruling should only apply in that district. THINK

 

[Concerned American]

A member of the Jan 6 plot.

Was he on the "pardoned" J6 commission?

Besides, Congress cannot dictate the jurisdiction of the courts.

Congress did dictate the the jurisdiction of the "district" courts when they created them, moron. Are you a product of the public school system?

 

[WEATHER53]

Utterly apparent from day one that a guy assigned a 50 mile by 50 miles area Coukd Not stymie an elected POTUS

 

[pknopp]

Because Federal law is different depending where you are at. LOL

MAGA is so stupid.

 

[WEATHER53]

Because Federal law is different depending where you are at. LOL

MAGA is so stupid.

Districts are not empowered over POTUS

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

They never think that far ahead, like when the next hurricane hits and there’s no FEMA.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Districts are not empowered over POTUS

Did you make this comment when:

District Court Judges in Texas and Missouri exercised power over the POTUS regarding Student Loans?

A District Court Judge in Texas exercised power over the POTUS regarding abortion medication certification?

A District Court Judge in Louisiana exercised power over the POTUS regarding COVID mandates?
.
.
.
.
.
Somehow I don't think so, there was probably much cheering going on that the courts were blocking the POTUS admnistration.

WW

 

[justoffal]

So then, a district judge should not be ruling on a national issue such as abortion or civil rights.

There's only one supreme Court

 

[Concerned American]

Did you make this comment when:

District Court Judges in Texas and Missouri exercised power over the POTUS regarding Student Loans?

A District Court Judge in Texas exercised power over the POTUS regarding abortion medication certification?

A District Court Judge in Louisiana exercised power over the POTUS regarding COVID mandates?
.
.
.
.
.
Somehow I don't think so, there was probably much cheering going on that the courts were blocking the POTUS admnistration.

WW

In each one of those cases you cited, constituents in those districts were affected by the POTUS order. Illegal immigrants are not constituents and the ones that were deported were not from DC, Boasberg's district.

 

[WorldWatcher]

In each one of those cases you cited, constituents in those districts were affected by the POTUS order. Illegal immigrants are not constituents and the ones that were deported were not from DC, Boasberg's district.

Psst - in each one of those cases the District Judge attempted to issue a NATIONAL in junctions.

BTW - Federal judges don't have "constituents" in the since of voters, all people are afforded due process rights.

WW

 

[Concerned American]

Psst - in each one of those cases the District Judge attempted to issue a NATIONAL in junctions.

Pssst. Those constituents had standing in a national class action. ILLEGAL immigrants have no standing nor does the judge in matters outside of his district.

BTW - Federal judges don't have "constituents" in the since of voters, all people are afforded due process

BTW, their districts have constituents. ILLEGAL immigrants are enemy invaders.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

89 federal district courts in the 50 states and their rulings should only apply in that district. That should be obvious. Can a city judge in columbus OH tell indianapolis what to do?

Hawley: End Federal District Courts' Ability to Issue Nationwide Injunctions

Monday, on FNC's "The Ingraham Angle," Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on his colleagues on Capitol Hill to institute a moratorium on lower federal court judges' ability to issue nationwide injunctions. | Clips

www.breitbart.com

If running to agenda driven leftist judges gets taken away from the Dems their entire playbook to win elections is gone. They’ll have to actually campaign on the truth.

 

[toobfreak]

Josh Hawley is a joke. A member of the Jan 6 plot.
And someone who makes idiotic claims like this

Idiotic claims like a district judge cannot have more power than the Supreme Court to unilaterally overrule the President???

Besides, Congress cannot dictate the jurisdiction of the courts.

Hey asshole, Congress appointed, defined and created all district court jobs in the first place, bonehead. He is a DISTRICT judge in that DISTRICT. The districts are even defined and mapped out--- see any districts which cover the whole country?

Then do tell us how a lower court judge not even in the Constitution has more power and authority than any of the co-equal branches of the government which created his position in the first place?