Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips
Read more at
Senator Dianne Feinstein Moves To Ban ALL Assault Rifles, High Capacity Magazines, and Pistol Grips (NASDAQ:SWHC, NYSE:RGR) | Market Daily News
The agenda no longer needs to be hidden from public view. With President Obama winning another term and democrats taking control of the Senate, the move to fundamentally change America from within has begun – with a vengeance.
We’re all aware of the restrictive gun laws in the State of California which require low capacity magazines for handguns, fixed magazines for “assault” rifles, and a whole lot of running around just to be granted the right to carry a concealed firearm.
Now, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), who has championed gun control in her state for decades and co-wrote the original assault weapons ban enacted by the federal government in the 1990′s, wishes to bring even more stringent federal mandates to the land of the free.
What is being proposed by Feinstein is the most significant attack on the second amendment in history.
I don’t have the minutes of the meeting (yet), but sources tell me California Senator and longtime gun-hater Dianne Feinstein’s legal staff held meetings on Friday with FTB/ATF legal staff to discuss a new “Assault Weapons Ban” Madame Feinstein would be looking to push through Congress if President Obama wins reelection.
This same “pretty good intelligence” says the items that would lead to a banwould ban pistol grips and “high-capacity” magazines, eliminate any grandfathering and ban sales of “weapons in possession”.
The progressive war on the Second Amendment is going to escalate.
Actually, the Senator has not ‘moved’ to do anything, as she’s introduced no legislation. And she’s been on the record as an advocate of a new AWB for years, this is nothing new.
Feinstein is in the minority among the democratic delegation concerning an AWB, and as with similar measures in the House, such a proposal would never make it out of committee.
Unlike republicans and abortion, the vast majority of democrats have accepted settled law on the issue and moved on.
Should by some bizarre, impossible process a new AWB in enacted, its implementation would be immediately enjoined by a Federal court and later invalidated as un-Constitutional, and that ruling would be upheld by the High Court.
This is a non-issue, a failed and partisan attempt to contrive a controversy where none exists.