Senate outlook for 2016

[PaintMyHouse]

As most political observers know - a General Election is much different than a mid-term election.

Save it Lieawatha, you loons vowed you wouldn't lose the Senate and guess what happened? You were shellacked, annihilated....why do you think that happened?

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not, she's still the most likely to win. Unlike you guys, we like running people who can win.

 

[Meathead]

Why not, she's still the most likely to win. Unlike you guys, we like running people who can win.

Where? What happened in 2014? Did you stop running people who could win for some reason?

Hillary has pretty much wrapped up her own career with her own gross stupidity. Her greatest achievement was marrying a future president.

 

[kaz]

"Looks good for Democrats"

I heard that all of 2014

As most political observers know - a General Election is much different than a mid-term election.

Save it Lieawatha, you loons vowed you wouldn't lose the Senate and guess what happened? You were shellacked, annihilated....why do you think that happened?

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Democrats went with a nobody junior senator from Illinois because she couldn't give them a woody. now you're handing a general election? It's not clear at this point she'll get through her own party when she failed badly before

 

[kaz]

Save it Lieawatha, you loons vowed you wouldn't lose the Senate and guess what happened? You were shellacked, annihilated....why do you think that happened?

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not, she's still the most likely to win. Unlike you guys, we like running people who can win.

That's odd since the Presidency has pretty consistently gone back and forth between the parties for half a century. Maybe you should start nominating people who aren't worthless just because you think they can win

 

[Nyvin]

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not, she's still the most likely to win. Unlike you guys, we like running people who can win.

That's odd since the Presidency has pretty consistently gone back and forth between the parties for half a century. Maybe you should start nominating people who aren't worthless just because you think they can win

It's gone consistently back and forth since 1992.....

 

[Roadrunner]

"Looks good for Democrats"

I heard that all of 2014

Literally zero people said that of 2014.

That is just a fuckin' lie, but you know that.

 

[Roadrunner]

Save it Lieawatha, you loons vowed you wouldn't lose the Senate and guess what happened? You were shellacked, annihilated....why do you think that happened?

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not? Who's her competition?

Well, from the way she is destroying evidence, it might be the Federal Pen.

 

[kaz]

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not, she's still the most likely to win. Unlike you guys, we like running people who can win.

That's odd since the Presidency has pretty consistently gone back and forth between the parties for half a century. Maybe you should start nominating people who aren't worthless just because you think they can win

It's gone consistently back and forth since 1992.....

I guess remembering the Hoover Administration your mind is slipping:

1952 Republicans take from Democrats
1960 Democrats take back
1968 Republicans take back
1976 Democrats take back
1980 Republicans take back
1992 Democrats take back
2000 Republicans take back
2008 Democrats take back

That is eight flips

 

[Lakhota]

Sleepy mid-term. Democrats knew President Obama controlled the White House.

You keep telling yourself that. The numbers of incumbents who went down were still historic for a mid term, skippy.

Since Hillary will likely be in the White House - voters must decide whether they want a few more years of Senate obstruction.

Still clinging to Hillary, eh?

Why not? Who's her competition?

Well, from the way she is destroying evidence, it might be the Federal Pen.

Funny. Even Fox News analysts said she hasn't broken any laws.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

 

[HenryBHough]

If Iran finishes their bomb as Obama seems to be encouraging it is not impossible that we might need an entirely new Congress. House, Senate, even building.

 

[Meathead]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

Early days, but this won't make you happy. Only one state is lean Dem while the rest are either safe, likely, lean Rep with a few toss ups.

United States Senate elections 2016 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Lakhota]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

Early days, but this won't make you happy. Only one state is lean Dem while the rest are either safe, likely, lean Rep with a few toss ups.

United States Senate elections 2016 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Oh, so now Wikipedia is considered "reliable" by NaziCons? Funny...

 

[Lakhota]

If Iran finishes their bomb as Obama seems to be encouraging it is not impossible that we might need an entirely new Congress. House, Senate, even building.

Buildings? Yeah, but you won't have slaves to build them this time.

 

[Meathead]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

Early days, but this won't make you happy. Only one state is lean Dem while the rest are either safe, likely, lean Rep with a few toss ups.

United States Senate elections 2016 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Oh, so now Wikipedia is considered "reliable" by NaziCons? Funny...

Yeah, because Wiki makes up their own polling numbers. Stop being such a pompous hack.

 

[HenryBHough]

If Iran finishes their bomb as Obama seems to be encouraging it is not impossible that we might need an entirely new Congress. House, Senate, even building.

Buildings? Yeah, but you won't have slaves to build them this time.

I didn't own any slaves at that time.

Please do not estimate others holdings according to your own.

 

[Lakhota]

Democrats only need to pick up FIVE seats to retake the Senate.

 

[Nyvin]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

Early days, but this won't make you happy. Only one state is lean Dem while the rest are either safe, likely, lean Rep with a few toss ups.

United States Senate elections 2016 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Any race that is basically "incumbent vs generic" will have the incumbent having a higher chance unless they're REALLY unpopular.

 

[Meathead]

"Senate outlook for 2016"

...looks very good for democrats, where republicans must defend 24 seats in a General Election, not a Midterm with only a third of the voters voting.

Early days, but this won't make you happy. Only one state is lean Dem while the rest are either safe, likely, lean Rep with a few toss ups.

United States Senate elections 2016 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

Any race that is basically "incumbent vs generic" will have the incumbent having a higher chance unless they're REALLY unpopular.

Thanks for that remarkable political insight.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

And by the time November 2016 arrives, republican candidates will have more than likely said and advocated for idiotic things, garnering more votes for democrats.