Article V movement

That’s what they said in 1787.
So do really think that 38 states can agree on anything?

This is all the convention will vote on:

1751975209909.webp


 
Actually conservatives lie about following ideals. That's why the GOP switched to "Populism"
GOP =/= conservative.

It is far more conservative than the DNC, but it is not truly conservative.
 
So do really think that 38 states can agree on anything?

This is all the convention will vote on:

View attachment 1133734

The convention of 1787 had a limited mandate, called to amend the Articles of Confederation. Made up of far more righteous souls than exist today, they threw out the government as it existed and created one that served the special interests of the day.
 
The convention of 1787 had a limited mandate, called to amend the Articles of Confederation. Made up of far more righteous souls than exist today, they threw out the government as it existed and created one that served the special interests of the day.
I'm discussing an Article V "Convention of States". Any new amendment requires 38 states as per the Constitution.
 
Perhaps the Progressives could help out on this. Look what you did with DOGE. Your premise is that the rich can make up the two trillion-dollar deficit. Yet you won't tax individuals and corporate interests at 80% or 90%. You have had many opportunities.
As in a Mirror, Reversed from Left to Right But Same Difference

The Dranocrats don't talk about inheritance taxes at all. So abolishing birth privileges is not a Liberal issue, despite Conservative accusations.

It should be a Populist issue, but the whole spectrum is controlled by a self-serving elite. Why should commoners beg to be caddies at the Country Club?
 
The Convention of STATES has a specific agenda that REQUIRES 38 states to approve any new amendments.
The 2nd Amendment is absolutely safe.
Nothing is "absolutely safe" in a CC. Take a look around. Look at how infested government is at all levels, by Marxists.

Scratch a democrat, or a RINO, and now a libertarian, and watch a Marxist bleed.
 
Nothing is "absolutely safe" in a CC. Take a look around. Look at how infested government is at all levels, by Marxists.
Scratch a democrat, or a RINO, and now a libertarian, and watch a Marxist bleed.
If there are at least 13 red states to vote down anything nefarious, and there are, a Convention of States is the only way to add a new Amendment for Congressional Term Limits, or a Balanced Budget, or States Rights.
We need term limits to get faster turnaround in Congress and the Senate. Too many geezers.
We obviously need a balanced budget amendment. CRs are an abomination.
 
It might not result in any Amendments, but I think the national discussion would be invaluable.
The COTUS Coituses Us, the People

Not as long as not having any Constitution at all is excluded as a position. All these controlled discussions are multiple-"choice" tests that don't include None of the Above.
 
If there are at least 13 red states to vote down anything nefarious, and there are, a Convention of States is the only way to add a new Amendment for Congressional Term Limits, or a Balanced Budget, or States Rights.
We need term limits to get faster turnaround in Congress and the Senate. Too many geezers.
We obviously need a balanced budget amendment. CRs are an abomination.
Those 13 states are infested. No state is safe. Look at Texas. The simple fact is if the government were following COTUS as it is written, there would be no issue.

But, as we all know, our government is ignoring the COTUS at every opportunity. We simply need to make them stop.
 
15th post
Those 13 states are infested. No state is safe. Look at Texas. The simple fact is if the government were following COTUS as it is written, there would be no issue.
But, as we all know, our government is ignoring the COTUS at every opportunity. We simply need to make them stop.
Trump needs to put a new young justice on the SCOTUS to replace Thomas, and then hope Sotamayor retires early to get a bonus appointment. 7-2 sounds about right.
Other than that I think you are very paranoid about the Convention of States. If I had to bet on it, there will never be 38 states to agree on anything.
 
We never claimed to be "fiscal conservatives"....you hypocritical MAGA ***** did.

You own this disastrous ******* bill, simp.
thanks for admitting that your party isn't even contemplating cuts to spending .. the Republicans do have a good number of leaders who are all about fiscal conservatism .. the Freedom Caucus is one example !
 
thanks for admitting that your party isn't even contemplating cuts to spending .. the Republicans do have a good number of leaders who are all about fiscal conservatism .. the Freedom Caucus is one example !
These are the same guys who just approved trillions in deficit spending right?

**** off.
 
Back
Top Bottom