seems appropriate

A "Human Rights Council" that has Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela sitting on it isn't worth being a part of.
 
A "Human Rights Council" that has Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela sitting on it isn't worth being a part of.
After all, what do they know of caging children?
 
The US is supposed to be the moral compass of the free world . TALK about bad optics ! Shameful .
 
It's ironic that when we finally have a U.N. Ambassador with some balls it's a woman. What does the common pop-culture raised American know about the U.N. except contrived Kumba-Ya stories? The U.N. "human rights council" ain't about human rights, it's about a left wing political agenda. The "human rights" council has been notoriously anti-Israel and chummy with countries that support terrorism since LBJ was president but nobody had the balls to call it.
 
The US is supposed to be the moral compass of the free world . TALK about bad optics ! Shameful .
Don't worry, everyone knows that's only for domestic consumption.
 
Jean Kilpatrick would be proud.

You obviously know nothing about the UN human rights counsel. It's been headed by Iran and Cuba. Ignorance is your stock in trade
 
A "Human Rights Council" that has Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Venezuela sitting on it isn't worth being a part of.
After all, what do they know of caging children?

akhund_kiss2.webp
 
The U.N. "human rights council" ain't about human rights, it's about a left wing political agenda.
'Human rights' came about opposing the right wing political agenda.
 
15th post

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom