These kinds of rulings scares you gun nutters to death.
I liked the idiot who said that car manufactuers should pay blah blah blah.
Arent you supposed to have insurance for your car? To pay for personal injury or death caused by you the driver? Sure you need to have insurance.
How about insurance for gun owners? That sound like a good idea?
Or do you not mind that non gun owners have to help pay for the damages caused by the gun owner? Any of you gun nutters ever look at what the cost is to treat gun shot wounds?
But its nice that you dont want the straw buyer for a gangbanger to have to pay any more money than necessary to get that high performance gun into a gang bangers hands.
Glad the ignorant white trash Dad that leaves his loaded gun where a kid can find it and shoots someone, sure am glad that dad doesnt have to contruibute to the medical costs that he created.
But what really scares you all is IF this kind of action (by this judge) is upheld and effective in reducing costs and shootings, you all are fucked. You all would have to start sharing the cost for your right to have a gun.
I like how your ant brain classifies everyone that supports the 2nd Amendment as gun nutters. And how we are scared. We're armed, you aren't.
Yes, auto drivers need insurance like we would if we were walking around on sidewalks shooting at things. If you sell a car to someone and they commit a crime it's no skin off your nose. The rest of your post is too much of a snivel to give time to.
Ice. Gun nutters is a non insult. It best, most easily describes the people like 2a and maybe you, that have seemingly based a good part of your identity on defending yourself from ????
And of course the other obsession is protecting something that you want unchanged or amended. The 2nd.
Problem you have is that your kind does two things bad; you think that by not addressing the gun violence issue in a sane more logical manner is somehow "defending" that most loved amendment.
The second stupid thing people like you do is make assumptions. As in you "assuming" that I am not armed and capable.
Lets say you have a nice 9mm pistol laying around and your punk nephew steals it from you and committs a crime, shoots some one and kills them. With your gun. That you left unsecured.
You sure you wouldnt like to have been insured against that type of theft and violence with your gun?
Maybe insurance companies can sell life insurance policies on gun ownership with kids in the house and/or mentally unstable in the house. Insure against kid death and suicide? Would you buy that insurance?