If God means money then yeah. I can't be the only one who noticed the smile the head ref tried wiping off his face every time he called a penalty in favor of GB. Apparently God blinded their eyes to holding on GB and offsides was transferred to Seattle because by golly GB could never do such a thing and they got so cocky with it that the GB lineman stood up too soon to point and actually was called on that one.
Not sure why that whole personal choice of WILSON'S not hers is so important to you but it is disturbing. What you are really saying is a man should not have honorable intentions toward a woman and if he isn't bedding her he is weak. At least Wilson lives what he believes so being so down on him for choosing to do so says a lot about those who criticize him for it. Funny how someone who lives what he believes in regard to his religious beliefs is thrown under the bus for it yet if he spoke against anyone else doing different he would be criticized for judging...that is classess
Ha...Ha..There. Is that better?
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
Pap, it's back to the refs.......couldn't blame the heat. Oh, well.......
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
Pap, it's back to the refs.......couldn't blame the heat. Oh, well.......
Holding is holding. The refs are probably on the up and up. Maybe they are just so enamored with Rodgers that they were blind to how he actually escapes so often. It's not like he is such a fantastic athlete. If you have any honest concern with me just trying to find excuses then I will offer you the same advice I did PooPoo. Go watch the game again on the NFL Game Pass and take your eyes off of Rodgers(if you can) and watch how the O-Linemen do their jobs. If you cannot then button it Sport.
Even with all of the ref's preferential treatment for GB the Hawks should have won. They made too many simple mistakes. Bennett's four off sides gave Rodgers several free plays. Funny how when Green Bay was off sides the refs called the plays dead and for the times Bennett screwed up the refs just let em play it out. You don't think THAT is odd? No of course you don't. That's just me whining. You don't have the guts to review the plays I'm talking about. All you can do is offer glib insults from the peanut gallery while I'm talking about actual football.
I'm not even saying that the refs obvious preferential treatment of GB was the reason. I'm blaming the Seahawks for THEIR mistakes. I just pointed out the ref's actions or lack of actions that favored the Packers in that stadium.
One thing it tells me is that the Packers will have more trouble in their away games because the refs won't be sucking Rodger's dick when out of Lambeau. They really are not THAT good without the official's assistance.
Don't forget the officials calling time out at the end of the 1st half for GB when they had no time outs and reviewed for some ball placement or some such bull. Strategic wasn't it? There are a lot of ways an official can influence a game without it showing on their performance review people. I do not believe Bill Levy has ever officiated another game in Seattle either een though all officials are suppose to rotate teams. Think that is a coincidence? Seattle fans have to be feisty and tenacious because over the years the Hawks have been the brunt of so many screw overs and been told to bend over and face the world and it swept under the rug by national media that the fans stand up and give everyone the middle finger but boy if we get a favorable call it is magnified for all eternity.
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
Pap, it's back to the refs.......couldn't blame the heat. Oh, well.......
Holding is holding. The refs are probably on the up and up. Maybe they are just so enamored with Rodgers that they were blind to how he actually escapes so often. It's not like he is such a fantastic athlete. If you have any honest concern with me just trying to find excuses then I will offer you the same advice I did PooPoo. Go watch the game again on the NFL Game Pass and take your eyes off of Rodgers(if you can) and watch how the O-Linemen do their jobs. If you cannot then button it Sport.
Even with all of the ref's preferential treatment for GB the Hawks should have won. They made too many simple mistakes. Bennett's four off sides gave Rodgers several free plays. Funny how when Green Bay was off sides the refs called the plays dead and for the times Bennett screwed up the refs just let em play it out. You don't think THAT is odd? No of course you don't. That's just me whining. You don't have the guts to review the plays I'm talking about. All you can do is offer glib insults from the peanut gallery while I'm talking about actual football.
I'm not even saying that the refs obvious preferential treatment of GB was the reason. I'm blaming the Seahawks for THEIR mistakes. I just pointed out the ref's actions or lack of actions that favored the Packers in that stadium.
One thing it tells me is that the Packers will have more trouble in their away games because the refs won't be sucking Rodger's dick when out of Lambeau. They really are not THAT good without the official's assistance.
Goo Goo takes Seattle fans out behind the woodshed. OOOooo... we are SOOoooo...butt hurt NOW!!!!
I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
Pap, it's back to the refs.......couldn't blame the heat. Oh, well.......
Holding is holding. The refs are probably on the up and up. Maybe they are just so enamored with Rodgers that they were blind to how he actually escapes so often. It's not like he is such a fantastic athlete. If you have any honest concern with me just trying to find excuses then I will offer you the same advice I did PooPoo. Go watch the game again on the NFL Game Pass and take your eyes off of Rodgers(if you can) and watch how the O-Linemen do their jobs. If you cannot then button it Sport.
Even with all of the ref's preferential treatment for GB the Hawks should have won. They made too many simple mistakes. Bennett's four off sides gave Rodgers several free plays. Funny how when Green Bay was off sides the refs called the plays dead and for the times Bennett screwed up the refs just let em play it out. You don't think THAT is odd? No of course you don't. That's just me whining. You don't have the guts to review the plays I'm talking about. All you can do is offer glib insults from the peanut gallery while I'm talking about actual football.
I'm not even saying that the refs obvious preferential treatment of GB was the reason. I'm blaming the Seahawks for THEIR mistakes. I just pointed out the ref's actions or lack of actions that favored the Packers in that stadium.
One thing it tells me is that the Packers will have more trouble in their away games because the refs won't be sucking Rodger's dick when out of Lambeau. They really are not THAT good without the official's assistance.
Nice rant Owen.
LOL!I have to agree on the constant holding by Green Bay O-Linemen. Almost every time Rodgers magically escapes there is one or more obvious holds that could and should have been called. Grabbing jerseys, tackling, tripping were happening. Conversely the holding call on Sherman that let GB off the hook and led to a score was totally bogus. Sherman absolutely did not grab or impede the WRs progress.
The Hawks should have won anyway in spite of the many questionable one sided calls that helped Rodgers look so "smart". That is just what a visiting team should expect in some stadiums. They, the Packers, get preferential treatment by the officials in Lambeau.
The 52 yard penalty on Sherman was probably a good call. Sherm was a blink too early after running halfway across the field when he hit the receiver. If Richard had been a tenth of a second later and the ball had made contact with the both of the receiver's hands he would have made the defensive play of the game.
PopsHisGooGoo would say Sherman played "sloppy" but that is OK. Every asshole has an opinion.
The poor loser showed up again, slams somebody then calls them the asshole, just like his butt buddy 911 does.
I wouldn't expect anything less than the whiner Huggy. Green Bay outplayed and won, pretty simple unless you are a poor loser.
Pap, it's back to the refs.......couldn't blame the heat. Oh, well.......
Holding is holding. The refs are probably on the up and up. Maybe they are just so enamored with Rodgers that they were blind to how he actually escapes so often. It's not like he is such a fantastic athlete. If you have any honest concern with me just trying to find excuses then I will offer you the same advice I did PooPoo. Go watch the game again on the NFL Game Pass and take your eyes off of Rodgers(if you can) and watch how the O-Linemen do their jobs. If you cannot then button it Sport.
Even with all of the ref's preferential treatment for GB the Hawks should have won. They made too many simple mistakes. Bennett's four off sides gave Rodgers several free plays. Funny how when Green Bay was off sides the refs called the plays dead and for the times Bennett screwed up the refs just let em play it out. You don't think THAT is odd? No of course you don't. That's just me whining. You don't have the guts to review the plays I'm talking about. All you can do is offer glib insults from the peanut gallery while I'm talking about actual football.
I'm not even saying that the refs obvious preferential treatment of GB was the reason. I'm blaming the Seahawks for THEIR mistakes. I just pointed out the ref's actions or lack of actions that favored the Packers in that stadium.
One thing it tells me is that the Packers will have more trouble in their away games because the refs won't be sucking Rodger's dick when out of Lambeau. They really are not THAT good without the official's assistance.
Nice rant Owen.
Even with all of the referee coddling going on Sunday night in Green Bay the Hawks were but a couple of plays from winning there. In a way I hope we must go back there after a whole season of letting the O-Line and the new DBs get a season of experience. It's a fact that the Hawks made many mistakes but we do have superior athletes all the way around..including at QB. It might be more fun as a Hawk fan to destroy GBs SB hopes in Lambeau.
