SCOTUS says keep punishing the Rs for cheating

[Truthmatters]

dear idiot,

you gave no proof

I gave decades of USA courts records and cases right up to the SCOTUS,

you gave ******* nothing

 

[Truthmatters]

There is NO equal case against the left.


there is nothing in the court records like this on the left

 

[Truthmatters]

you don't mind your ******* party cheats huh

******* traitor

 

[Truthmatters]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times



January 14, 2013


just last year.

now why do you refuse these cold hard undeniable facts?




For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

If a chicken and a half lays an egg and a half in a day and a half, how long will it take for a SCOTUS decision on a decades old consent agreement to mean something to me???



Sended fum muh iFoam usin sum magikl ****** ju-ju shit.

 

[Truthmatters]

nothing to compare with you cheating asses

 

[Rat in the Hat]

Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree - Los Angeles Times



January 14, 2013


just last year.

now why do you refuse these cold hard undeniable facts?




For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.

The case began in 1981 when the RNC created a “national ballot security task force” that, among other things, undertook mailing campaigns targeted at black and Latino neighborhoods in New Jersey. If mailers were returned undelivered, party activists put those voters on a list to be challenged if they showed up to cast a ballot. In addition, the party was alleged to have hired off-duty law enforcement officers to “patrol” minority neighborhoods on election day.

The DNC sued the RNC in federal court, alleging its activities violated the Voting Rights Act and were intended to suppress voting among minorities. Rather than fight the charges in a trial, the RNC agreed to a consent decree promising to “refrain from undertaking any ballot security activities … directed toward [election] districts that have a substantial proportion of racial or ethnic minority populations.”

The consent decree has remained in effect, and DNC lawyers say they have gone to court in states such as Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana and Pennsylvania to challenge Republican activities that appear to target mostly black precincts. Both sides agree, however, that the consent decree does not forbid “normal poll watching” by Republican officials.

The RNC has tried repeatedly to have the consent decree lifted, contending it interferes with its efforts to combat voter fraud. But a federal judge in New Jersey in 2009 ruled that it should remain in effect, and the U.S. Court of Appeals agreed last year.

Sended fum muh iFoam usin sum magikl ****** ju-ju shit.

 

[Truthmatters]

look at how these ******* ass slime treat our court system

 

[Zoom-boing]

If a chicken and a half lays an egg and a half in a day and a half, how long will it take for a SCOTUS decision on a decades old consent agreement to mean something to me???



Sended fum muh iFoam usin sum magikl ****** ju-ju shit.

Pineapples!

 

[Zoom-boing]

TM has no couth. Not one single iota of it.

 

[IlarMeilyr]

TM has no couth. Not one single iota of it.

Oddly enough, that figure corresponds with her IQ.

 

[Star]

Considering how well elected officials represent their constituency, I'm surprised they vote even once. Risking arrest to vote multiple times seems beyond absurd.

"Risking arrest to vote multiple times seems beyond absurd."
Bingo!
And that my friend is why voter impersonation almost never happens and-----and Republicans know it-----Republicans know it because they refuse to appropriate your tax money to investigate it. Hmm wonder why?
But fortunately, what Republicans refuse to do, Rolling Stone did for them, check it out...


- Rolling Stone: "not only is voter fraud not rampant – it's virtually nonexistent"

Rolling Stone debunks all the Republican ‘voter fraud’ myths being used as an excuse to suppress the vote with ID laws on Election Day:

“But here’s the thing: Not only is voter fraud not rampant – it’s virtually nonexistent. The iron-clad word on the subject comes from the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law, whose 2007 report, ‘The Truth About Voter Fraud,’ sorts through thousands of allegations going back to the 1990s in the most in-depth voter fraud study ever undertaken. The bottom line, confirmed by all subsequent research: ”Usually, only a tiny portion of the claimed illegality is substantiated — and most of the remainder is either nothing more than speculation or has been conclusively debunked.””

1. Double voting – In Missouri in 2000 and 2002, hundreds of voters were alleged to have voted twice either within the state or once in Kansas and once in Missouri. Reporters followed up on 18 Kansas City; 13 were shown to result from clerical errors. In total, public sources backed up only four cases, for a documented fraud rate of 0.0003 percent
2. Voting by Dead People – An investigation turned up only one instance, and even this was later found to have been an error: One Alan J. Mandel was alleged to have voted in 1998, despite having died in 1997. It turned out that another Alan J. Mandell (two “l”s) – very much alive – was the guy who’d voted, but election workers simply checked the wrong name off of their list.
3. Voting With Fraudulent Addresses – In New Hampshire, a citizen became concerned because 88 individuals had registered with residences on property owned by Daniel Webster College. Further investigation revealed that all 88 were DW students living on college property.
4. Voting by Convicted Felons — In 2000, Florida claimed that 5,643 ineligible persons with convictions actually voted in the general election. Upon investigation, it turned out the data included eligible citizens with misdemeanors, citizens with convictions after their valid vote, and eligible voters whose names and birthdates matched those of convicted felons.
5. Voting by Noncitizens — In Washington in 2005, county officials were asked to investigate the citizenship status of 1,668 registered voters based on their “foreign-sounding names.” Not a single individual on the submitted list turned out to be a noncitizen.
6. Registration Fraud — “Most reports of registration fraud do not actually claim that the fraud happens so that ineligible people can vote at the polls. Indeed, we are aware of no recent substantiated case in which registration fraud has resulted in fraudulent votes being cast.”
7. Voting by Dogs — There is no typical case. Brennan found only two cases – ever – of ballots being submittted in the name of a dog: a ballot cast by “Duncan MacDonald” in 2006 and 2007 (but labeled “VOID” and signed with a paw print), and another cast by “Raku Bowman” in 2003 in a local election in Venice, California.
8. Vote Buying — Vote buying is not fraud – it’s an illegal agreement between citizens, usually with the direct involvement of a candidate or campaign – and can’t be addressed by most of the remedies put forward to tackle fraud – photo ID laws, restrictions on registration, etc.
9. Fraud by Election Officials — Fraud by election officials does happen, but, like vote-buying, it is not a form of voter fraud. If election officials are willing to break the law, rules designed to restrict voting won’t stop them.

.
​

 

[IlarMeilyr]

Voter fraud not getting prosecuted does NOT constitute evidence that it is not happening.

We have seen many examples of Dim voter fraud.

Libs denying it is kinda pathetic.

ONE example is one example too many, by the way.

 

[Freewill]

I posted this in TMs other spam thread but I am putting it here also so TM can't say she missed real cheating on a national level. BTW the cheating went unpunished as far as I know.

What you are saying about it, repeatedly is a big fat lie. No one is cheating. Except all the confirmed democrats that gladly admit they voted more then once. And they don't care cause YOU don't care, because democrats are cheaters. Just like they lied to the Supreme court of Florida during the 2001 election, now that is real cheating.

Here is a link, you will certainly ignore, that lists all the false statements made during the Florida election debacle. Both Republican and Democrat. But the ones I want you to read are these two:

David Boies (Gore lead attorney):
Stated to the Florida Supreme Court that dimpled chads had been counted as votes in a case upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court.

Turns out that statement was totally false, as was the affidavit Boies had the lawyer in that case sign. However, Boies still managed to walk on water in the eyes of the media.

Would you consider this cheating and or lying?.

David Boies and Florida Supreme Court:

The Court asked Boies how many votes Gore had picked up in the Palm Beach hand recount. Boies said 215. The Court then order 215 to be deducted from Bush's margin.

There was only one problem here. According to the Democratic Election Supervisor Theresa LePore, Gore only picked up 174. Despite this inconvenient fact, the news media used the 215 figure in their new calculations until the U.S. Supreme Court halted the recount. How scary is it that the vote OFFICIAL vote total was, at least temporarily, wrongly determined by a LAWYER?!

Again, is this cheating and lying?

I realize you are just repeating what your handlers tell you to say but come on you even have to realize they handed you the wrong end of the stick.

http://www.johnziegler.com/editorial...p?editorial=39

BTW, if Bios had not said what he said to the SCOF then the whole issue most certainly have died right then and there. Through his saying what he said the country went through a month of BS.

 

[Zoom-boing]

I posted this in TMs other spam thread but I am putting it here also so TM can't say she missed real cheating on a national level. BTW the cheating went unpunished as far as I know.

What you are saying about it, repeatedly is a big fat lie. No one is cheating. Except all the confirmed democrats that gladly admit they voted more then once. And they don't care cause YOU don't care, because democrats are cheaters. Just like they lied to the Supreme court of Florida during the 2001 election, now that is real cheating.

Here is a link, you will certainly ignore, that lists all the false statements made during the Florida election debacle. Both Republican and Democrat. But the ones I want you to read are these two:

David Boies (Gore lead attorney):
Stated to the Florida Supreme Court that dimpled chads had been counted as votes in a case upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court.

Turns out that statement was totally false, as was the affidavit Boies had the lawyer in that case sign. However, Boies still managed to walk on water in the eyes of the media.

Would you consider this cheating and or lying?.

David Boies and Florida Supreme Court:

The Court asked Boies how many votes Gore had picked up in the Palm Beach hand recount. Boies said 215. The Court then order 215 to be deducted from Bush's margin.

There was only one problem here. According to the Democratic Election Supervisor Theresa LePore, Gore only picked up 174. Despite this inconvenient fact, the news media used the 215 figure in their new calculations until the U.S. Supreme Court halted the recount. How scary is it that the vote OFFICIAL vote total was, at least temporarily, wrongly determined by a LAWYER?!

Again, is this cheating and lying?

I realize you are just repeating what your handlers tell you to say but come on you even have to realize they handed you the wrong end of the stick.

http://www.johnziegler.com/editorial...p?editorial=39

BTW, if Bios had not said what he said to the SCOF then the whole issue most certainly have died right then and there. Through his saying what he said the country went through a month of BS.

TM will ignore this and continue with her spamming and incivility. She is a hopeless troll who should be completely ignored.

 

[Truthmatters]

scotus decisions are NOT spam

 

[Truthmatters]

see how the right treats their treasonous USE of our system?



gee


They are the enemy

 

[Truthmatters]

AQ likely prays for them

 

[Zoom-boing]

I posted this in TMs other spam thread but I am putting it here also so TM can't say she missed real cheating on a national level. BTW the cheating went unpunished as far as I know.

What you are saying about it, repeatedly is a big fat lie. No one is cheating. Except all the confirmed democrats that gladly admit they voted more then once. And they don't care cause YOU don't care, because democrats are cheaters. Just like they lied to the Supreme court of Florida during the 2001 election, now that is real cheating.

Here is a link, you will certainly ignore, that lists all the false statements made during the Florida election debacle. Both Republican and Democrat. But the ones I want you to read are these two:

David Boies (Gore lead attorney):
Stated to the Florida Supreme Court that dimpled chads had been counted as votes in a case upheld by the Illinois Supreme Court.

Turns out that statement was totally false, as was the affidavit Boies had the lawyer in that case sign. However, Boies still managed to walk on water in the eyes of the media.

Would you consider this cheating and or lying?.

David Boies and Florida Supreme Court:

The Court asked Boies how many votes Gore had picked up in the Palm Beach hand recount. Boies said 215. The Court then order 215 to be deducted from Bush's margin.

There was only one problem here. According to the Democratic Election Supervisor Theresa LePore, Gore only picked up 174. Despite this inconvenient fact, the news media used the 215 figure in their new calculations until the U.S. Supreme Court halted the recount. How scary is it that the vote OFFICIAL vote total was, at least temporarily, wrongly determined by a LAWYER?!

Again, is this cheating and lying?

I realize you are just repeating what your handlers tell you to say but come on you even have to realize they handed you the wrong end of the stick.

http://www.johnziegler.com/editorial...p?editorial=39

BTW, if Bios had not said what he said to the SCOF then the whole issue most certainly have died right then and there. Through his saying what he said the country went through a month of BS.

TM will ignore this and continue with her spamming and incivility. She is a hopeless troll who should be completely ignored.

 

[Truthmatters]

dude your in a thread and you IGNORED the entire PROOF given that proves your party is a ******* traitorous party.



why does only petty bullshit matter to you and you IGNORE a decades long FIGHT with the courts your party wages so they can CHEAT right from the top of your party?



because facts don't matter to YOU