- Thread starter
- #201
Those the numbers the FBI doesn't include?Most reports after that don't give actual gang number estimates, but instead tell the person to refer to local law enforcement for numbers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those the numbers the FBI doesn't include?Most reports after that don't give actual gang number estimates, but instead tell the person to refer to local law enforcement for numbers.
Most reports after that don't give actual gang number estimates, but instead tell the person to refer to local law enforcement for numbers.
Question remainsWhy is President Trump wishing this woman well and doing everything w/i his power to get her out OP?
Might have to wait for some time.Question remains
Will Trump pardon a groomer of young women for illicit sex with Epstein and friends?
From your own link..So there's probably a lot more now.
Chicago-based gangs maintain connections to and influence over gangs in outlying suburban communities (See Appendix E, Map 6). An estimated 70 to 75 gangs with more than 100,000 members reportedly operate within Chicago and have consistently been a concern for law enforcement.
2008.................![]()

Seems to you employing young women is bad. She went to Epstein but was not stole from Trump. Trump has managers over Mar a Lago.I didn't claim that. You were in such a hurry to whine like a baby that you made something up to whine about without realizing it.
If you had asked me 6 months ago if I thought Trump diddled kids or participated in pimping kids, I would have said no.
Then the fat rapist stood on his airplane and complained about the CHILD that Espetein stole from him
A CHILD that worked in the SPA at Mar A Lago.
A CHILD whose name he remembered.
Eek. Not a good look for the fat rapist. That moved the needle a bit, for me.
You sure? Now Trump simply not pardining Maxwell satisfies you.No goal posts have been moved by me. But, you seem to want to make shit up to argue.
Have at it, FFS.
You just cant post like normal, honest person, can you?Seems to you employing young women is bad
President Trump appreciated Maxwell turning state's evidence. But if he wanted her out she would be out. He has 100% constitutional authority to make that happen.Why is President Trump wishing this woman well and doing everything w/i his power to get her out OP?
He is clearly entertaining the idea.President Trump appreciated Maxwell turning state's evidence. But if he wanted her out she would be out. He has 100% constitutional authority to make that happen.
He is clearly entertaining the idea.
That's enough for normal people to throw up in their mouths.
Not MAGA, though. Shit... MAGA puts on its jackboots and defends him
Softball.Give your evidence for 'he is clearly entertaining the idea.'
The level of hotness here is off the charts.Trump is not the most virtuous man on the planet and has a long list of defects. The question of the century that the democraps will do anything to avoid is "Despite all his defects, why is Trump POTUS today?" The answer is, he was still preferred in the popular vote over the democraps' best in the last general election. Now, why was that? The typical response from the left is "The electorate is stupid!" My question is, who is more stupid, the electorate or the democraps who continue to ignore just how bad their very best politicians are? Trump is a lot of things, but he is still no where near as bad as your best. Keep that in mind as you troll. We do.
Now waiting for your display of integrity.Give your evidence for 'he is clearly entertaining the idea.' I have certainly seen no evidence of any kind of that.
If you have no evidence, you would have more integrity if you just admitted you made that up.
Softball.
When asked about it, he said he would "take a look at it" and discuss it with his DOJ. He didn't say "no".
Like a normal human would have done.
That's definitive evidence.
You didn't see that?
Saying he will look at it and discuss it with the DOJ is literally the equivalent of entertaining the idea.Not definitive evidence since it hasn't happened.
Give yout evidence for jackboots. Any legitimate photo or video will suffice.He is clearly entertaining the idea.
That's enough for normal people to throw up in their mouths.
Not MAGA, though. Shit... MAGA puts on its jackboots and defends him.
The jackboot comment is what educated people call a colloquialism.Give yout evidence for jackboots. Any legitimate photo or video will suffice.
It is what normal people call hate speech when completely misused as you did. Now can you apply how it pertains to the SCOTUS ruling that is the topic of this thread?The jackboot comment is what educated people call a colloquialism.