Completely false. If you knew anything about the subject you'd be embarrassed. How many people and animals drowned in the eruption of Mt. St. Helens?
Stop it. Stop the atheist conjectures, i.e. lies. The Bible explained it first and the Earth evidence that we find back up the global flood.
C14 dating of dinosaur fossils, diamonds, rocks, other fossils, etc. back up a younger Earth of thousands of years than what the atheist scientists claim of billions of years with radiometric dating.
Are you the spokesman for the scientific community? You are the atheist without any proof that life simply developed all on its own -------- yet you cannot even fabricate the same with presently existing stepping stones of life. I would have to say that you and not I are "ridiculous". Ridiculous in you denial. Ridiculous in your religious atheistic fervor. Ridiculous in your hatred of other considerations. The Flood epic in Genesis say that the heavens opened and the fountains of the deep erupted. For 40 days and nights all the living things upon the land were systematically swept away. They suffocated, they drowned, they were buried.
Get out of the science section you embarrassing, pathetic liar.
advances.sciencemag.org
Any child can read a 2 paragraph article and know you made up that stupid, pathetic lie. You can sit there all day and jerk off to thoughts of me., and your pathetic lie generated from your diseased brain will still be a pathetic lie. You are embarrassing yourself and your immoral religion with your behavior.
You ignored the part about the clear geological evidence for multiple extinctions in different eras.
Why? It is imperative that creationists lie. They are pitiful pests that enjoy trolling science forums.
But, nothing within the last six thousand years.
Why should I trust an atheist science website, you worthless POS simpleton and liar? Where is the evidence for it being spread around the globe?Get out of the science section you embarrassing, pathetic liar.
Science | AAAS
answersingenesis.org
The creation scientists know that the global flood was the grandaddy of all extinctions.
How can a creationist lie if he goes by God's word in the Bible? Science backs up the Bible even though it isn't a science book. That should make you turn red with embarrassment for being so wrong about your competition such as your age of the Earth fiasco and posting under the wrong topic. At least if I don't know about what atheist scientists are doing and have come up with, then I can go to evolution.berkeley.edu done by my secular alma mater.
So what caused the other extinctions?
FYI, "creation scientists" is an oxymoron while "atheist scientists" is redundant. Science is, by definition, a study of the natural world. If a "scientist" invokes supernatural forces or events to explain something, they are no longer a scientist and have become a theologian. Just sayin'.
Your opinions about C14 dating are erroneous because they reflect misinformation from the various creationer ministries.
Science does not “back up” the Bible. Please show us where science “backs up” a flat earth, talking snakes, dead people becoming undead, etc., etc.
When your source is charlatans at AIG, you immediately lose credibility.Why should I trust an atheist science website, you worthless POS simpleton and liar? Where is the evidence for it being spread around the globe?
'Lack of an iridium anomaly
The secular model predicts a layer containing higher than crustal levels of iridium (a rare earth element) should spread out across the globe after a major impact hits the earth, but this is not necessarily the case. Much of the iridium produced in an impact stays in the debris at or near the impact site, and does not go up in a dust cloud to later settle globally (Taylor 2007).
Although higher levels of iridium have been found in rocks near the K-Pg boundary at many sites around the globe (Claeys, Kiessling, and Alvarez 2002), it is not universally distributed. In fact, Ir-anomalies are not always observed in adjacent locations within the same rock unit, as Clemens and Hartman (2014) found in the Hell Creek Formation in eastern Montana.
Sarjeant and Currie (2001) further reported that the original site in Gubbio, Italy, made famous by the Alvarez et al. paper (1980), was reanalyzed by Crocket et al. (1988) and Rocchia et al. (1990). These authors found that the reported iridium anomaly was not a single spike in value as claimed by Alvarez et al. (1980), but a series of iridium-rich layers spread across a 4 m thick interval. Sarjeant and Currie (2001) concluded that this is hardly the type of data that support a single impact.
And what was found at the Chicxulub site in all the cores and drilling results to date? Although a few traces of iridium were identified in melt rocks in wells C-1 and Y-5 (Fig. 1) (Schuraytz et al. 1996; Sharpton et al. 1992) no significant amounts of iridium have been found in any of the ejecta material or impactite layers across the Chicxulub site (Keller et al. 2004b). The amount found in the melt-rich rocks in C-1 and Y-6 ranged from none detected to 13.5 ppb, reportedly “well above typical crustal concentrations” (Sharpton et al. 1992, 820). Finally, there was no trace of an iridium spike in the top of the impactite in the Yaxcopoil-1 (Yax-1) core and no iridium reported to date within the M0077A core drilled in 2016.
In addition to the less than expected iridium, Paquay et al. (2008) found that the osmium residue in marine sediments at the K-Pg was insufficient for a large impactor the size of what has been claimed for Chicxulub.
Ironically, an iridium-rich layer is often used to identify the K-Pg boundary, where it is found (Claeys, Kiessling, and Alvarez 2002), and yet there is virtually no iridium in the impactite material at the very site claimed to be the “smoking gun.”'
Do Data Support Large Meteorite Impact at Chicxulub?
The evidence for a large impact at Chicxulub may not be as strong as generally believed. A case can also be made that there was no impact.
ETA: You just want me out of S&T because I am right most of the time and destroy arguments by other atheists. Envy is one of the deadly sins.
