Scientists Suggest That The Universe Knew

[danielpalos]

The original sin applies to all as explained in the Bible. We have that, history, and not the age of the Earth as IMPORTANT.

In Nexus 6 with Zardoz and incorrigible Original Sinners. Is that why Satan rebelled; he didn't want to "get stuck with us"?

 

[james bond]

As intelligent as the human mind is, it still has foibles that override the intelligence. Think of Jim Jones and his Kool Aid, QAnon, the Waco TX Davidians, Scientology, flat earthers, and yes Creationism.

There are a lot of trap doors in the brain that marketers, politicians, and clergy know about and they know how to open and pore their cause directly into the brains. And the hapless victims are not even aware that they've been had.

Sadly the human race is destroying itself.
.

Not creationism and creation science. The best scientists throughout history were creation scientists. Your two atheist scientists came up with Darwinism and radiometric dating. I can't think of anything else. You were the one who thought age of Earth was an argument against the creationists, but were wrong. You prolly believe something can go faster than the speed of light when that is impossible. Even Jim Jones was atheist and not theist. Liberals started to believe QAnon and wanted POTUS Trump impeached for obstruction of justice. That's crazy. BTW, what do you know about the Branch Davidians? Scientology is condemned by both religious and secular groups. Flat Earthers and Flattie Hollie are both crazy. You may as well be one. Finally, you lie lumping creationists with the above. Atheists, their scientists, and people like you are more closely related than creationists. It's more ignorance and espousal of stupid statements by yourself.

You were soundly whupped with the age of the Earth and radiometric dating.

>>There are a lot of trap doors in the brain that marketers, politicians, and clergy know about and they know how to open and pore their cause directly into the brains. And the hapless victims are not even aware that they've been had.

Sadly the human race is destroying itself.<<

You and the atheists do not know that you've been had by Satan. Sadly the human race will be destroyed by God, i.e. second coming of Jesus, again like with the global flood. This time no survivors. I can spew religion just as well as your liberal atheism.

 

[james bond]

Where does the Bible explain five separate extinction level events that happened more than six thousand years apart?

Only one extinction event so far -- "In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened." Genesis 7:11

 

[danielpalos]

Only one extinction event so far -- "In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened." Genesis 7:11

No meteor that is alleged to have killed the dinosaurs has impacted Earth within the last six thousand years.

 

[Wuwei]

Not creationism and creation science. The best scientists throughout history were creation scientists. Your two atheist scientists came up with Darwinism and radiometric dating. I can't think of anything else. You were the one who thought age of Earth was an argument against the creationists, but were wrong. You prolly believe something can go faster than the speed of light when that is impossible. Even Jim Jones was atheist and not theist. Liberals started to believe QAnon and wanted POTUS Trump impeached for obstruction of justice. That's crazy. BTW, what do you know about the Branch Davidians? Scientology is condemned by both religious and secular groups. Flat Earthers and Flattie Hollie are both crazy. You may as well be one. Finally, you lie lumping creationists with the above. Atheists, their scientists, and people like you are more closely related than creationists. It's more ignorance and espousal of stupid statements by yourself.

You were soundly whupped with the age of the Earth and radiometric dating.

>>There are a lot of trap doors in the brain that marketers, politicians, and clergy know about and they know how to open and pore their cause directly into the brains. And the hapless victims are not even aware that they've been had.

Sadly the human race is destroying itself.<<

You and the atheists do not know that you've been had by Satan. Sadly the human race will be destroyed by God, i.e. second coming of Jesus, again like with the global flood. This time no survivors. I can spew religion just as well as your liberal atheism.

You missed the entire point of my post.
Instead, you just blather on with your non-sequiturs, trolling and preaching.
.

 

[alang1216]

Only one extinction event so far -- "In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened." Genesis 7:11

The fossil record says you are clearly wrong.

 

[james bond]

No meteor that is alleged to have killed the dinosaurs has impacted Earth within the last six thousand years.

Unless you believe what the atheist scientists are saying with their mistaken belief of Chicxulub asteroid impact 65 M years ago. First, the impact was local and would not have scattered iridium around the globe. The atheist scientists are backing off this claim today. Second, 65 M yrs ago is based on erroneous radiometric dating done during the 50s.

 

[james bond]

The fossil record says you are clearly wrong.

The creation scientists are the ones with dinosaur fossils with soft tissue and C14 remaining. That would be impossible with dinosaurs that went extinct 65 millions years ago as atheist scientists claim. Also, the giant asteroid hypothesis doesn't add up. The fossil record actually shows it wasn't so.

 

[james bond]

Spoken like a troll. An anti-science troll at that.

Lol, it is hypocritical for an evolutionist to claim their opposition is anti-science.

If one can't prove old age of the Earth, then evolution and evolutionary thinking are dead. Furthermore, we know the dinosaurs weren't all killed off by an asteroid.

 

[alang1216]

The creation scientists are the ones with dinosaur fossils with soft tissue and C14 remaining. That would be impossible with dinosaurs that went extinct 65 millions years ago as atheist scientists claim. Also, the giant asteroid hypothesis doesn't add up. The fossil record actually shows it wasn't so.

The K-T extinction was even the biggest extinction event (that would be the Permian). We find dinos and many other species below that boundary that we don't find in layers above them. You may claim that was Noah's flood but you'd still be left explaining how the same type of evidence is found in much older rock.

It is estimated that 95% of species went extinct in the Permian. Of the new species found just after that event, there were no dinos, they didn't come until later.

 

[Hollie]

Sure, when the atheist side has nothing but radiometric dating. I showed it is erroneous and atheist scientists have ages from millions to billions of years (not 4.5 B). It's curious that the atheists still use the dates from 1956. The scientist who did the erroneous dating was soon forgotten. Why not use it to date something we know the age of?

Again, how can it fit when the layers of the Earth has been jumbled up by catastrophism? You have no argument against what happened to the Earth's layers. The layers show location and not time.

You knowingly make false claims. Radiometric dating is just one method of dating.

Scientists using only dating from 1956 is another false claim.

It seems the hyper-religious are not concerned with facts or personal integrity.

 

[Hollie]

Lol, it is hypocritical for an evolutionist to claim their opposition is anti-science.

If one can't prove old age of the Earth, then evolution and evolutionary thinking are dead. Furthermore, we know the dinosaurs weren't all killed off by an asteroid.

How many dinosaurs walked off of Noah's Ark? One would think that any of the real gargantuan dinosaurs would have left some intact fossils such as Mammoths.

 

[Hollie]

Lol, it is hypocritical for an evolutionist to claim their opposition is anti-science.

If one can't prove old age of the Earth, then evolution and evolutionary thinking are dead. Furthermore, we know the dinosaurs weren't all killed off by an asteroid.

The age of the earth is the study of physics and geology. Biological evolution is a different discipline. While the sciences overlap and different fields of study are complimentary, you should have noticed that biology and geology are spelled differently.

That's called a clue.

 

[LittleNipper]

The fossil record says you are clearly wrong.

If there is anything about the general fossil record is that clearly everything drowned.

 

[Hollie]

If there is anything about the general fossil record is that clearly everything drowned.

Not true.

Ancient Ash Volcanoes Entombed Chinese Dinosaurs

Ashy, explosive, volcanic outbursts killed and buried the famed dinosaurs of northern China, a new study says.

www.nationalgeographic.com

 

[LittleNipper]

You knowingly make false claims. Radiometric dating is just one method of dating.

Scientists using only dating from 1956 is another false claim.

It seems the hyper-religious are not concerned with facts or personal integrity.

RADIOCARBON DATING​

Radiocarbon dating was developed in the 1950s by chemist Willard F. Libby. It revolves around the element carbon-14 (14C): an isotope of carbon that is produced when the sun’s energy interacts with nitrogen atoms in the earth’s atmosphere.

 

[LittleNipper]

Not true.

Ancient Ash Volcanoes Entombed Chinese Dinosaurs

Ashy, explosive, volcanic outbursts killed and buried the famed dinosaurs of northern China, a new study says.

www.nationalgeographic.com

Catastrophic smothering...

 

[Hollie]

Catastrophic smothering...

Not drowning. So clearly everything didn’t drown. However, animals quickly covered in sediment reveal a great many details.

 

[Hollie]

RADIOCARBON DATING​

Radiocarbon dating was developed in the 1950s by chemist Willard F. Libby. It revolves around the element carbon-14 (14C): an isotope of carbon that is produced when the sun’s energy interacts with nitrogen atoms in the earth’s atmosphere.

Once again scientists “discovering” what is explained clearly in the science text called the Bible. Would you like to point out the verse that provides a comprehensive description of radiocarbon dating?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If there is anything about the general fossil record is that clearly everything drowned.

Why oh why do you make up such stupid lies and post them in the science section? Ridiculous behavior.