Science moves closer to biblical creation.

[Woodznutz]

It is also true that since creation is a supernatural event, science can never get 'closer' to it?

By closer I mean closer to realizing that it was a supernatural event.

 

[Woodznutz]

Shall I assume that you're bound and determined to always miss (if not completely ignore) any well supported point that you don't like with a vengeance?

I was being generous. It's actually zero. When you say "Lot's of" (quote "blaa, blaa, blaa") you're not paraphrasing so it best be exact or you're talking BS.

It is exactly five (that's a lot). I've isolated the statements for you.

One common belief among scientists is that a distant star collapsed, creating a supernova explosion, which disrupted the dust cloud and caused it to pull together.

Scientists believe that Earth, like the other inner planets, came to its current state in three different stages.

Scientists believe the next stage involved the collision of a protoplanet with a very young planet Earth.

It is believed that during the early formation of Earth, asteroids were continuously bombarding the planet, and could have been carrying with them an important source of water.

Scientists believe the asteroids that slammed into Earth, the moon, and other inner planets contained a significant amount of water in their minerals, needed for the creation of life.

These unfounded and unproven beliefs are predicated on this introductory statement,

"Billions of years ago, Earth, along with the rest of our solar system, was entirely unrecognizable, existing only as an enormous cloud of dust and gas. Eventually, a mysterious occurrence—one that even the world’s foremost scientists have yet been unable to determine—created a disturbance in that dust cloud, setting forth a string of events that would lead to the formation of life as we know it."

This pattern is repeated in almost all such articles, which reveal the extent of scientific belief, sans proof. It's the faith of the religion of science.

 

[Grumblenuts]

By closer I mean closer to realizing that it was a supernatural event.

You expect a lot from a word simply meaning to study systematically.
Science:

noun

1. the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
   "the world of science and technology"

It is exactly five (that's a lot). I've isolated the statements for you.

One common belief among scientists is that a distant star collapsed, creating a supernova explosion, which disrupted the dust cloud and caused it to pull together.

Scientists believe that Earth, like the other inner planets, came to its current state in three different stages.

Scientists believe the next stage involved the collision of a protoplanet with a very young planet Earth.

It is believed that during the early formation of Earth, asteroids were continuously bombarding the planet, and could have been carrying with them an important source of water.

Scientists believe the asteroids that slammed into Earth, the moon, and other inner planets contained a significant amount of water in their minerals, needed for the creation of life.

Noted. You fail to understand the obvious difference between quoting and paraphrasing.

 

[alang1216]

By closer I mean closer to realizing that it was a supernatural event.

I've never heard any mention of the supernatural in the science world. Ever, so I'm not sure there is a case to be made there.

 

[Woodznutz]

You expect a lot from a word simply meaning to study systematically.
Science:


Noted. You fail to understand the obvious difference between quoting and paraphrasing.

You can't run from this statement, a statement that also found in many such articles.

Eventually, a mysterious occurrence—one that even the world’s foremost scientists have yet been unable to determine—

This is the 'sand' that science has built its house on.

 

[Woodznutz]

I've never heard any mention of the supernatural in the science world. Ever, so I'm not sure there is a case to be made there.

Science will eventually come to the realization everything they can detect comes from that which in undetectable.

 

[alang1216]

You can't run from this statement, a statement that also found in many such articles.

Eventually, a mysterious occurrence—one that even the world’s foremost scientists have yet been unable to determine—

This is the 'sand' that science has built its house on.

God of the gaps - a theological perspective in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence.

 

[alang1216]

Science will eventually come to the realization everything they can detect comes from that which in undetectable.

Prediction, prophesy, or wish?

 

[Woodznutz]

Prediction, prophesy, or wish?

Plain statements from the bible.

 

[Woodznutz]

God of the gaps - a theological perspective in which gaps in scientific knowledge are taken to be evidence or proof of God's existence.

A phrase invented by unbelievers clearly intended to direct attention away from the failings of science.

 

[Grumblenuts]

You can't run from this statement, a statement that also found in many such articles.

Eventually, a mysterious occurrence—one that even the world’s foremost scientists have yet been unable to determine—

This is the 'sand' that science has built its house on.

Has it? Built a house? On sand? Really?
You do love to your idioms. Got a picture to share of this science house under construction? Any testable, tangible evidence of something supernatural being real at all?

 

[Mushroom]

They created something from electricity

Which like light is also a particle.

So, let me get this right. They created particles from nothing, but needed particles to do it.

Seems a bit circular to me.

 

[Woodznutz]

Has it? Built a house? On sand? Really?
You do love to your idioms. Got a picture to share of this science house under construction? Any testable, tangible evidence of something supernatural being real at all?

What is really supernatural is so common that we consider it to be natural.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Science will eventually come to the realization everything they can detect comes from that which in undetectable.

Clever, but first off, that would be scientists, not "Science." Next, "everything" clearly doesn't. Hens noticeably produce chicken eggs. Lastly, not being able to detect something today doesn't preclude us from ever doing so.

 

[Grumblenuts]

What is really supernatural is so common that we consider it to be natural.

Nice conspiracy theory. Sadly, it doesn't address the question.

 

[alang1216]

Plain statements from the bible.

Which statements from which Bible?

 

[alang1216]

A phrase invented by unbelievers clearly intended to direct attention away from the failings of science.

I think it is more of an observation on the successes of science. How many still believe in the 6 days of creation vs the big bang?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

God created the material universe "out of thin air", that is, out of nothing (although there is more to the story than this). Science has moved closer to demonstrating this.

MSN

"Creating" Lava From a Volcano

That matter comes from the Mother Universe that all our matter, energy, light, and even space come from. Somehow the physicists created a gateway to that dimension, which also occurs in fission.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

And that of course just "kicks the can down the road."
Who 'created' "a race with sufficient technology"? Or should I say how did IT come to be?
Transpermia solves nothing.
`

A Seed Doesn't Grow in Sand, Which Is All There Is in a Childish Sandbox Like the University

Rewarding HIgh IQs immediately for studying creates super-natural technology. We don't get that from unpaid education, which is an insult to intelligence. So we're stuck in a downward spiral. The Big Bang was an upward spiral, because it entered a world that would be transformed through intelligence.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Okay, one last thing. A photon is then just a linear unit quantity of light energy. A little field in a sea of fields. All just Aether manifestations. A photon's length and speed depend upon the density of matter its attempting to pass through. Not a wave. Not a particle. It will travel at c wherever there's relatively little matter around to interfere. Again, due to the Aether's attraction to dense matter, light (energy) is bent around massive bodies in space such as black holes, planets, and so forth. All that four dimensional "spacetime" BS logically rendered "unnecessary"! Fugget about it! Space cannot "warp" by definition.

Fiat Looks

The ether drags on light. Postmodern scientists are so shallow that they never ask why light's maximum velocity is c. In the other universe, it is c squared.