Science is about truth. Low IQ Joe is not

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
In the 2008 VP debate with Sarah Palin (a seriously TOUGH debate opponent - COUGH COUGH!!!) Low IQ Joe said Earth had one (and only one) polar ice cap. Palin was too dumb to remind Joe there are actually TWO.... one with 90% of Earth's ice, and the other with under 10%.....

Low IQ Joe couldn't pass a high school science class if the election depended on it....

Let's go over some of the basics. Low IQ Joe wants us to believe that Co2 in the atmosphere is causing Global Warming. Did the DATA actually say that???

Um.... no. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps = satellites and balloons....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested (LOL - suggested ---) the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Really, the satellite and balloon data show a flat line that goes up and down a bit, with a flat line trend. Co2 in the atmosphere went up. The two and only two data points we have measuring temps in the atmosphere said NO WARMING. Hence, by SCIENCE, the THEORY that Co2 causes "warming" would be REJECTED by the TRUTH of the highly correlated data.

What did Low IQ Joe's pals do?

They FUDGED BOTH SERIES with 2 uncorrelated "corrections" so that both now show "warming" that does not exist.




Another big argument is whether Antarctica is melting or not, given that it has 90% of Earth's ice. We went to court in Britain on that issue in 2007...



" The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing. "


the "warmers" did not appeal, but rather kept right on lying...

What does the actual NASA data say???



" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008. "





which explains why there is NO OCEAN RISE and why Cocksucker Obama and his man wife recently bought property, BEACHFRONT property, on MV.


What do Low IQ Joe's "science" guys do about NO OCEAN RISE.....????


They LIE about islands sinking.... because they are right near the Pacific Ring of Fire, and in 3 million years, the islands won't just be underwater, they will be UNDER THE EARTH's CRUST....

and NEVER MIND the FACT that three island chains in the south Pacific are sinking while.... PRECISELY NOTHING ELSE IS.... (when the "ocean" rises, it only does so near these islands = Low IQ Joe "science")







See the source image

See the source image






"
 

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
22,029
Reaction score
16,816
Points
2,445
Location
The Southwestern Desert
Democrats have polluted the scientific community with stooges the same way they did with the media. Instead of doing their jobs, they skew their "studies" and "news reports" to advance Democrat narratives.
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
And they are also way too COWARDLY to actually debate the issues, insisting instead on PARROTING the "experts."


Low IQ Joe knows Global Warming is a FRAUD, because the cowardly closeted compromised communist Kenyan Cocksucker in Chief found out from the FBI in 2010....

first it was THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE

then the Cocksucker went SILENT for TWO YEARS

and then back to the same PARROTING....






This is all about what is in Bill Barr's DOJ that is being blocked by John Roberts right now. If Low IQ Joe wins, the Global Warming FRAUD continues. If he loses.... we find out why the Cocksucker went silent for two years...
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
67,972
Reaction score
10,795
Points
2,030
In the 2008 VP debate with Sarah Palin (a seriously TOUGH debate opponent - COUGH COUGH!!!) Low IQ Joe said Earth had one (and only one) polar ice cap. Palin was too dumb to remind Joe there are actually TWO.... one with 90% of Earth's ice, and the other with under 10%.....

Low IQ Joe couldn't pass a high school science class if the election depended on it....

Let's go over some of the basics. Low IQ Joe wants us to believe that Co2 in the atmosphere is causing Global Warming. Did the DATA actually say that???

Um.... no. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps = satellites and balloons....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested (LOL - suggested ---) the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Really, the satellite and balloon data show a flat line that goes up and down a bit, with a flat line trend. Co2 in the atmosphere went up. The two and only two data points we have measuring temps in the atmosphere said NO WARMING. Hence, by SCIENCE, the THEORY that Co2 causes "warming" would be REJECTED by the TRUTH of the highly correlated data.

What did Low IQ Joe's pals do?

They FUDGED BOTH SERIES with 2 uncorrelated "corrections" so that both now show "warming" that does not exist.




Another big argument is whether Antarctica is melting or not, given that it has 90% of Earth's ice. We went to court in Britain on that issue in 2007...



" The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing. "


the "warmers" did not appeal, but rather kept right on lying...

What does the actual NASA data say???



" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008. "





which explains why there is NO OCEAN RISE and why Cocksucker Obama and his man wife recently bought property, BEACHFRONT property, on MV.


What do Low IQ Joe's "science" guys do about NO OCEAN RISE.....????


They LIE about islands sinking.... because they are right near the Pacific Ring of Fire, and in 3 million years, the islands won't just be underwater, they will be UNDER THE EARTH's CRUST....

and NEVER MIND the FACT that three island chains in the south Pacific are sinking while.... PRECISELY NOTHING ELSE IS.... (when the "ocean" rises, it only does so near these islands = Low IQ Joe "science")







See the source image

See the source image






"
Your interpretation of the data is interesting. Of course, you should have included the source of all your data, and noted why your interpretation differs from virtually every prominent climate scientist in the world. Your credentials, along with any peer reviewed articles need to be presented as well.
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
why your interpretation differs from virtually every prominent climate scientist in the world.


If the thermometer says 70F, how does your side "interpret" that???

LMFAO!!

We went to COURT in 2007 in Britain, and your side got exposed.... and never had the courage to APPEAL.... but rather just kept on "interpreting" FUDGE and FRAUD as "science."




How marvelous. And what are those inaccuracies?

  • The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
  • The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
  • The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
  • The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
  • The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
  • The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
  • The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
  • The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.




LMFAO!!!!!


And the "climate scientists" were TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL THE RULING!!!!!
 

DBA

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Messages
3,668
Reaction score
3,087
Points
1,940
In the 2008 VP debate with Sarah Palin (a seriously TOUGH debate opponent - COUGH COUGH!!!) Low IQ Joe said Earth had one (and only one) polar ice cap. Palin was too dumb to remind Joe there are actually TWO.... one with 90% of Earth's ice, and the other with under 10%.....

Low IQ Joe couldn't pass a high school science class if the election depended on it....

Let's go over some of the basics. Low IQ Joe wants us to believe that Co2 in the atmosphere is causing Global Warming. Did the DATA actually say that???

Um.... no. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps = satellites and balloons....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested (LOL - suggested ---) the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Really, the satellite and balloon data show a flat line that goes up and down a bit, with a flat line trend. Co2 in the atmosphere went up. The two and only two data points we have measuring temps in the atmosphere said NO WARMING. Hence, by SCIENCE, the THEORY that Co2 causes "warming" would be REJECTED by the TRUTH of the highly correlated data.

What did Low IQ Joe's pals do?

They FUDGED BOTH SERIES with 2 uncorrelated "corrections" so that both now show "warming" that does not exist.




Another big argument is whether Antarctica is melting or not, given that it has 90% of Earth's ice. We went to court in Britain on that issue in 2007...



" The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing. "


the "warmers" did not appeal, but rather kept right on lying...

What does the actual NASA data say???



" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008. "





which explains why there is NO OCEAN RISE and why Cocksucker Obama and his man wife recently bought property, BEACHFRONT property, on MV.


What do Low IQ Joe's "science" guys do about NO OCEAN RISE.....????


They LIE about islands sinking.... because they are right near the Pacific Ring of Fire, and in 3 million years, the islands won't just be underwater, they will be UNDER THE EARTH's CRUST....

and NEVER MIND the FACT that three island chains in the south Pacific are sinking while.... PRECISELY NOTHING ELSE IS.... (when the "ocean" rises, it only does so near these islands = Low IQ Joe "science")







See the source image

See the source image






"
Your interpretation of the data is interesting. Of course, you should have included the source of all your data, and noted why your interpretation differs from virtually every prominent climate scientist in the world. Your credentials, along with any peer reviewed articles need to be presented as well.
They are all funded by leftist sources. They aren't so dumb to risk that funding. An alternate finding to what the left wants them to find, would result in no more funding.
 

wamose

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
6,522
Reaction score
5,551
Points
2,015
Location
Pennsylvania
Joe says he has a plan. He'll follow the science. But he's not bright enough to differentiate between real science and ouija board predictions. Biden is just too dumb, crooked and old to be our President. Stick with Trumpy.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
67,972
Reaction score
10,795
Points
2,030
why your interpretation differs from virtually every prominent climate scientist in the world.


If the thermometer says 70F, how does your side "interpret" that???

LMFAO!!

We went to COURT in 2007 in Britain, and your side got exposed.... and never had the courage to APPEAL.... but rather just kept on "interpreting" FUDGE and FRAUD as "science."




How marvelous. And what are those inaccuracies?

  • The film claims that melting snows on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.
  • The film uses emotive images of Hurricane Katrina and suggests that this has been caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that it was "not possible" to attribute one-off events to global warming.
  • The film shows the drying up of Lake Chad and claims that this was caused by global warming. The Government's expert had to accept that this was not the case.
  • The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic ice. It turned out that Mr Gore had misread the study: in fact four polar bears drowned and this was because of a particularly violent storm.
  • The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream throwing Europe into an ice age: the Claimant's evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility.
  • The film blames global warming for species losses including coral reef bleaching. The Government could not find any evidence to support this claim.
  • The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt causing sea levels to rise dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for millennia.
  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
  • The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7m causing the displacement of millions of people. In fact the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40cm over the next hundred years and that there is no such threat of massive migration.
  • The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to New Zealand. The Government are unable to substantiate this and the Court observed that this appears to be a false claim.




LMFAO!!!!!


And the "climate scientists" were TOO CHICKEN TO APPEAL THE RULING!!!!!
That's it? A video made by a politician 13 years ago had some mistakes in it, so virtually every major climate scientist in the world since then is wrong? And you think you are proving them wrong using data gathered from Internet conspiracy theory sites, Alex Jones, Glen Beck, and geniuses like Louie Gohmert? That's funny.
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
67,972
Reaction score
10,795
Points
2,030
In the 2008 VP debate with Sarah Palin (a seriously TOUGH debate opponent - COUGH COUGH!!!) Low IQ Joe said Earth had one (and only one) polar ice cap. Palin was too dumb to remind Joe there are actually TWO.... one with 90% of Earth's ice, and the other with under 10%.....

Low IQ Joe couldn't pass a high school science class if the election depended on it....

Let's go over some of the basics. Low IQ Joe wants us to believe that Co2 in the atmosphere is causing Global Warming. Did the DATA actually say that???

Um.... no. We have two and only two measures of atmospheric temps = satellites and balloons....




satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested (LOL - suggested ---) the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.



Really, the satellite and balloon data show a flat line that goes up and down a bit, with a flat line trend. Co2 in the atmosphere went up. The two and only two data points we have measuring temps in the atmosphere said NO WARMING. Hence, by SCIENCE, the THEORY that Co2 causes "warming" would be REJECTED by the TRUTH of the highly correlated data.

What did Low IQ Joe's pals do?

They FUDGED BOTH SERIES with 2 uncorrelated "corrections" so that both now show "warming" that does not exist.




Another big argument is whether Antarctica is melting or not, given that it has 90% of Earth's ice. We went to court in Britain on that issue in 2007...



" The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing. "


the "warmers" did not appeal, but rather kept right on lying...

What does the actual NASA data say???



" the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008. "





which explains why there is NO OCEAN RISE and why Cocksucker Obama and his man wife recently bought property, BEACHFRONT property, on MV.


What do Low IQ Joe's "science" guys do about NO OCEAN RISE.....????


They LIE about islands sinking.... because they are right near the Pacific Ring of Fire, and in 3 million years, the islands won't just be underwater, they will be UNDER THE EARTH's CRUST....

and NEVER MIND the FACT that three island chains in the south Pacific are sinking while.... PRECISELY NOTHING ELSE IS.... (when the "ocean" rises, it only does so near these islands = Low IQ Joe "science")







See the source image

See the source image






"
Your interpretation of the data is interesting. Of course, you should have included the source of all your data, and noted why your interpretation differs from virtually every prominent climate scientist in the world. Your credentials, along with any peer reviewed articles need to be presented as well.
They are all funded by leftist sources. They aren't so dumb to risk that funding. An alternate finding to what the left wants them to find, would result in no more funding.
So who is funding the research you are using?
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
had some mistakes in it,

A COURT of LAW found that

1. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is INCREASING
2. Co2 did not cause prior warmings according to the ICE CORE DATA


Now, a true scientist would admit the truth of that data....

1. no net ice melt ongoing on Earth
2. hence, no ocean rise either, which is why your side lies about a few islands
3. no correlation between Co2 and temperatures


But your side does not do that. Your side lies, fudges data, and expects science invalids like you to




See the source image





and PARROT you do....
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
67,972
Reaction score
10,795
Points
2,030
had some mistakes in it,

A COURT of LAW found that

1. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is INCREASING
2. Co2 did not cause prior warmings according to the ICE CORE DATA


Now, a true scientist would admit the truth of that data....

1. no net ice melt ongoing on Earth
2. hence, no ocean rise either, which is why your side lies about a few islands
3. no correlation between Co2 and temperatures


But your side does not do that. Your side lies, fudges data, and expects science invalids like you to




See the source image





and PARROT you do....
A COURT OF LAW found that a politician made some mistakes in a video. I wonder if that's the first video where a politician made a mistake.
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
Another smoking gun that Co2 is not the cause of Earth climate change is the past million years.

One million years ago, Greenland was ALL GREEN because it was FURTHER SOUTH.....




" DNA is proof that sometime between 450,000 and 800,000 years ago, much of Greenland was especially green and covered in a boreal forest that was home to alder, spruce and pine trees, as well as insects such as butterflies and beetles.

From the genetic material of these organisms, the researchers infer that Greenland’s temperature once varied from 50 degrees Fahrenheit in summer to 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit in winter—the temperature range that the tree species prefer.

“We have shown for the first time that southern Greenland … was once very different to the Greenland we see today,” said study leader Eske Willerslev of the University of Copenhagen."


duh, when land moves closer to a Pole, it gets COLDER.....



And North America one million years ago, while Greenland was all green, was covered with glaciers down to INDIANA.....



See the source image






And hence, during the past million years


GREENLAND FROZE

while


NORTH AMERICA THAWED


all at the SAME TIME on the SAME PLANET with the SAME ATMOSPHERE with the SAME AMOUNT OF Co2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE.....



(The Democrats are hence left arguing that all atmospheric Co2 "clumped" over NA and fled Greenland....)

LOL!!!!


Co2 has NOTHING to do with Earth climate change
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
3,717
Reaction score
506
Points
140
A COURT OF LAW found that a politician made some mistakes in a video


LOL!!!

Clearly we have a Hillary CULT member here....

A COURT OF LAW found that the "scientific" arguments made by Algore's pals were 100% FALSE. There is no ongoing ice melt on Earth. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is INCREASING....

If the Warmers do not have a net ice loss on Antarctica, then they don't have a claim to sea level rise.... which is why they lie about those islands....



Tell us, Bulldog, if Antarctic ice is INCREASING, is sea level rising??

LFMAO!!!!
 

BULLDOG

Diamond Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2014
Messages
67,972
Reaction score
10,795
Points
2,030
A COURT OF LAW found that a politician made some mistakes in a video


LOL!!!

Clearly we have a Hillary CULT member here....

A COURT OF LAW found that the "scientific" arguments made by Algore's pals were 100% FALSE. There is no ongoing ice melt on Earth. 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica is INCREASING....

If the Warmers do not have a net ice loss on Antarctica, then they don't have a claim to sea level rise.... which is why they lie about those islands....



Tell us, Bulldog, if Antarctic ice is INCREASING, is sea level rising??

LFMAO!!!!
To claim that any judge would even attempt to rule against the consensus of the vast majority of major climate scientists is absurd. Perhaps he did rule on information in a politician's video, but that is as far as it went. Anything more would just be absurd.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top