Schumer calls for a "forceful uprising"

[ThisIsMe]

I think his words are shameful and unscrupulous, not to mention hypocritical since the democrats tried to paint Trump's words as a call to insurrection back in the day. It sure sounds like a call to violence to me.

Pretty brazen considering how close to no kings protest we are.

Should we expect a higher chance of violence now?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Why does no one call them on the carpet in the media for inciting violence? They actually lie so bad, they used Merrick Garalnd, and the rest of the DOJ, and attorney generals in specific Democrat strongholds, to go after Trump. Knowing what the outcome would be and then have the cajoles to try this projection?

Your lack of understanding needs to be rectified comrade. Do better!

 

[Mac-7]

Please, they're not 'Libs' they are scum. If you don't want to call them that because you're in Polite Company, then call them what they are -- "Leftists"

Don't let dimocrap scum control speech. If we let them control speech, we let them control thought. FACT

But 'scum' is more appropriate. And I DO mean all of them. Especially the voters

They are on the left

And its getting increasingly difficult to separate them from what used to be moderate or rational libs

But yes, the worst of the libs are truly scum

They are acting like fools dressed in frog suits outside ICE compounds every night

And dome of them are shooting at ICE agents or ramming them with cars

Most libs do not go that far

But they do cheer the violence on

 

[Care4all]

Dems desperately trying to downplay this. It is what it is. Incitement to violence. Its not the first time they've done it

Are you really some sort of Pansy, Snowflake? Chuck Schumer is saying that democrats and all who reject Trump's authoritarianism and unconstitutional acts, need to show it, and come out in force, as forceful as ever, for the No Kings Protest.

He is not calling for violence, for goodness sake! (Listen to all of the speeches on 1/6 if you want to compare with what incitement actually is....especially Trump's one hour, incinerating speech, and Rudy's.)

Democrats DO NOT want any kind of violence or rioters, we are NOT STUPID and do not support violence as your side tries to brain wash you to believe. We want a forceful, a come out in huge huge numbers crowd, peaceful demonstration/protest.

Any rioters or vandals that try to take advantage of the peaceful crowds for their 15 minutes of crime, is on them...not us. They are disrupting and disturbing the peaceful protesters and not welcomed....

We don't want a riot. We want a protest, a full blooded American, first amendment protected, Constitutional redress of grievances and protest against our government's actions. Amen!

 

[22lcidw]

Are you really some sort of Pansy, Snowflake? Chuck Schumer is saying that democrats and all who reject Trump's authoritarianism and unconstitutional acts, need to show it, and come out in force, as forceful as ever, for the No Kings Protest.

He is not calling for violence, for goodness sake! (Listen to all of the speeches on 1/6 if you want to compare with what incitement actually is....especially Trump's one hour, incinerating speech, and Rudy's.)

Democrats DO NOT want any kind of violence or rioters, we are NOT STUPID and do not support violence as your side tries to brain wash you to believe. We want a forceful, a come out in huge huge numbers crowd, peaceful demonstration/protest.

Any rioters or vandals that try to take advantage of the peaceful crowds for their 15 minutes of crime, is on them...not us. They are disrupting and disturbing the peaceful protesters and not welcomed....

We don't want a riot. We want a protest, a full blooded American, first amendment protected, Constitutional redress of grievances and protest against our government's actions. Amen!

The violence we have seen over the years is on video tape.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Why does no one call them on the carpet in the media for inciting violence? They actually lie so bad, they used Merrick Garalnd, and the rest of the DOJ, and attorney generals in specific Democrat strongholds, to go after Trump. Knowing what the outcome would be and then have the cajoles to try this projection?

Sounds Insurrectiony to me

Very Insurrectiony

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AI Overview

Recent claims that Chuck Schumer called for a "forceful uprising" are being circulated in misleading videos and posts on social media. The claims misrepresent his actual statements, which have consistently advocated for political action and denounced violence, particularly in light of a recent government shutdown and campus protests.

GFY.

LOL!

Are you ******* serious??

Just watch the video for yourself

 

[toobfreak]

Chuck Schumer is saying that democrats and all who reject Trump's authoritarianism and unconstitutional acts, need to show it, and come out in force, as forceful as ever, for the No Kings Protest.

Are you sure? I took it that Chuckie was just talking about and hoping for a forceful uprising in his trousers because lord knows he hasn't seen one of those in years but DC hookers don't come cheap anymore these days you know.

 

[CrazyTrader55]

Why does no one call them on the carpet in the media for inciting violence? They actually lie so bad, they used Merrick Garalnd, and the rest of the DOJ, and attorney generals in specific Democrat strongholds, to go after Trump. Knowing what the outcome would be and then have the cajoles to try this projection?

That's inciting violence.

Now, what is Trump going to do about it?

 

[struth]

Are you really some sort of Pansy, Snowflake? Chuck Schumer is saying that democrats and all who reject Trump's authoritarianism and unconstitutional acts, need to show it, and come out in force, as forceful as ever, for the No Kings Protest.

He is not calling for violence, for goodness sake! (Listen to all of the speeches on 1/6 if you want to compare with what incitement actually is....especially Trump's one hour, incinerating speech, and Rudy's.)

Democrats DO NOT want any kind of violence or rioters, we are NOT STUPID and do not support violence as your side tries to brain wash you to believe. We want a forceful, a come out in huge huge numbers crowd, peaceful demonstration/protest.

Any rioters or vandals that try to take advantage of the peaceful crowds for their 15 minutes of crime, is on them...not us. They are disrupting and disturbing the peaceful protesters and not welcomed....

We don't want a riot. We want a protest, a full blooded American, first amendment protected, Constitutional redress of grievances and protest against our government's actions. Amen!

Schumer shut the govt down and he’s calling trump authoritarian l? What unconditional acts?

Schumer is calling up his brownshirts to kill more and firebomb more. Those are the things that actualky have happened

 

[Frankenstein]

Your lack of understanding needs to be rectified comrade. Do better!

I heard it with my own ears jackwagon stop, stop trying to run cover for his recklessness

 

[Frankenstein]

That's inciting violence.

Now, what is Trump going to do about it?

Nothing he knows they are mostly talk and we have all the guns, they are trying to get him to do anything they can point at, and say see fascist

 

[petro]

AI Overview

Recent claims that Chuck Schumer called for a "forceful uprising" are being circulated in misleading videos and posts on social media. The claims misrepresent his actual statements, which have consistently advocated for political action and denounced violence, particularly in light of a recent government shutdown and campus protests.

GFY.

AI overview is for morons.

Besides, out of context parsing of quotes is a libtard thing.

 

[SeaMajor7]

AI overview is for morons.

Besides, out of context parsing of quotes is a libtard thing.

GIGO FOREVER.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

He said it with his own lips you heard it!

.

The cult actually believe that AI proves their POV.

It will be short lived.

.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Democrats really want another Kent State.

.

Don't give it to them.

.

 

[Edgetho]

Most libs do not go that far

But they do cheer the violence on

The highlighted part is what matters.

Are dimocrap scum voters more or less guilty than the German civilians in Weimar? Are they more or less guilty than the People who worked at the Slave Market in Atlanta? Are dimocrap FILTH voters more or less guilty than the people of Paris during the Reign of Terror?

Is there any difference? Did the people of Japan during WW2 not know about the atrocities in China? Particularly The Rape of Nanking? Did they not know of the mistreatment of POWs at Bataan and inside Japan itself?

They knew. The people of Germany knew very well what was going on. So did the People of Japan.

Wanna go further back? How about the people of Rome? The people of Mongolia? The people of what is now Goatfuckerland during the conquests of muhammed the baby-raper? (you **** a 9 year-old, you is a rapist. period)

dimocrap scum voters know EXACTLY who and what they're voting for. 100% They can feign indignation at the excesses, then turn and snicker as soon as you're not looking.

They are cowards. Which is the very reason WHY they are dimocrap scum voters in the first place. One thing all cowards have in common is -- They're lazy.

And being a dimocrap FILTH voter is the easiest thing in the world. You don't have to think for yurself at all. The DISGUSTING FILTH tells you how to live, how to raise your chilluns, how to cook, how to ****, and especially how to VOTE.

The Heart and Sould of the dimocrap FILTH Party is the DISGUSTING FILTH. Even in what passes for our edumucashunal system, they align totally with the DISGUSTING FILTH.

Being a dimocrap scum is -- Easy. Which is why most people that vote for those despicable scum vote that way in the first place. It's easy. Nanny-State easy. No effort. No reason to think for yourself. No reason to go against Big Goobermint. No reason to care about anything the DISGUSTING FILTH doesn't tell you to care about.

So, you know what? **** dimocrap scum voters. I wouldn't cross the street to piss on a dimocrap if he was on fire.

 

[Edgetho]

Antifa Members Charged as Terrorists for the First Time After Anti-ICE Sniper Attack.

PULSE POINTS ❓WHAT HAPPENED: A federal grand jury indicted two alleged Antifa members on terrorism-related charges for attacking a U.S. Immigration and

thenationalpulse.com

This matters

 

[Zincwarrior]

When ICE starts getting shit and their headquarters are blown up, then it will be thr violence you scream.about.

 

[Nostra]

AI Overview

Recent claims that Chuck Schumer called for a "forceful uprising" are being circulated in misleading videos and posts on social media. The claims misrepresent his actual statements, which have consistently advocated for political action and denounced violence, particularly in light of a recent government shutdown and campus protests.

GFY.

Fake intelligence.