Schiff: Whistleblower will testify soon

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So what? Good thing we don't filter reality through the trump cultist lens.

In what the rest of us call "reality", there is firsthand information in the whistleblower report, and the transcript released by the white house confirmed his account and cemented his credibility.

n what the rest of us call "reality", there is firsthand information in the whistleblower report,

link?

To what?

what I quoted...the firsthand information.

The firsthand information in the report, and the IC IG confirming there is firsthand info in the report, is not enough for you?

Again...that's your problem. Not mine.

no, YOUR problem.

you are claiming there is firsthand information.

prove it.

I just did. If you don't accept that as proof, that's your problem. Not mine. I'm not going to lose sleep over whiny cultists inventing their own realities.

 

[The Purge]

 

[The Original Tree]

So..in this day and age..can this person testify without anyone leaking his/her identity?

Whistleblower Is Expected to Testify Soon, House Intelligence Chairman Schiff Says

"The whistleblower at the center of the impeachment probe of President Trump will testify in the House “very soon,” though in a way that will protect his identity, the Democrat leading the probe said Sunday.
The whistleblower, whose identity hasn’t been made public, works for the Central Intelligence Agency, The Wall Street Journal confirmed last week.

“We’ll get the unfiltered testimony of that whistleblower,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman, said on ABC’s “This Week.” “We are taking all the precautions” to protect his identity, Mr. Schiff added.
President Trump’s personal attorney, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, initially said on the same program that he wouldn’t cooperate with Mr. Schiff’s probe, accusing the congressman of lacking fairness.
But Mr. Giuliani quickly changed his position, saying he would consider testifying. “I have to be guided by my client,” Mr. Giuliani said. “Frankly, it’s his privilege, not mine. If he decides he wants me to testify I will testify.”
Mr. Giuliani is a key figure in the impeachment probe and is depicted in the whistleblower complaint released Thursday as eager to thrust himself into U.S. foreign policy. As the president’s personal attorney, Mr. Giuliani pressed Ukraine on pursuing an investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden."

There is zero value in having this Fake Whistleblower testify if he does not do it publicly before The American People. No point at all if they want to do anything regarding impeachment. They actually do not want to vote on this, because doing so, means that the Fake Whistleblower will have to testify publicly.

So this is a FARCE. It's just a dog and pony show, and propaganda campaign that they plan to run right up to 2020. They have been running the same tired show since 2016, and wasting our time and our money.

 

[mudwhistle]

So..in this day and age..can this person testify without anyone leaking his/her identity?

Whistleblower Is Expected to Testify Soon, House Intelligence Chairman Schiff Says

"The whistleblower at the center of the impeachment probe of President Trump will testify in the House “very soon,” though in a way that will protect his identity, the Democrat leading the probe said Sunday.
The whistleblower, whose identity hasn’t been made public, works for the Central Intelligence Agency, The Wall Street Journal confirmed last week.

“We’ll get the unfiltered testimony of that whistleblower,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D., Calif.), the House Intelligence Committee chairman, said on ABC’s “This Week.” “We are taking all the precautions” to protect his identity, Mr. Schiff added.
President Trump’s personal attorney, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, initially said on the same program that he wouldn’t cooperate with Mr. Schiff’s probe, accusing the congressman of lacking fairness.
But Mr. Giuliani quickly changed his position, saying he would consider testifying. “I have to be guided by my client,” Mr. Giuliani said. “Frankly, it’s his privilege, not mine. If he decides he wants me to testify I will testify.”
Mr. Giuliani is a key figure in the impeachment probe and is depicted in the whistleblower complaint released Thursday as eager to thrust himself into U.S. foreign policy. As the president’s personal attorney, Mr. Giuliani pressed Ukraine on pursuing an investigation of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden."

Yes......this spy...who admitted to only knowing hearsay information (gossip) ....will remain in hiding.....will testify about lies he related in his complaint against a president......even though we all know now he was full of shit when he filed the complaint.....because Trump released the transcripts.....thus blowing their plans all to shit.
The only folks that are buying this hoax are the useful idiots who never pay attention.

 

[Auld Phart]

link?

To what?

what I quoted...the firsthand information.

The firsthand information in the report, and the IC IG confirming there is firsthand info in the report, is not enough for you?

Again...that's your problem. Not mine.

no, YOUR problem.

you are claiming there is firsthand information.

prove it.

I just did. If you don't accept that as proof, that's your problem. Not mine. I'm not going to lose sleep over whiny cultists inventing their own realities.

I just did.

no, you didn't.
Quoting the IC IG is NOT providing proof.
It's a deflection

'm not going to lose sleep over whiny cultists inventing their own realities.

Bud, if you want to impeach Trump, and remove him from office, go for it.

I didn't vote for him in 2016, I won't vote for him in 2020.

But I do see that a lot of these attacks are because there is no one in the dem lineup that can beat him in 2020.

The only reason he won in 2016 was because you fools let Hillary get the nomination.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

no, you didn't.
Quoting the IC IG is NOT providing proof.

...to you.

Again...not sure how you are not getting rhis through your head...if it is not enough for you, I do not care. That is your problem,not mine. Why would it be my burden to change the mind of cultish freaks? It isn't.

 

[Thinker101]

no, you didn't.
Quoting the IC IG is NOT providing proof.

...to you.

Again...not sure how you are not getting rhis through your head...if it is not enough for you, I do not care. That is your problem,not mine. Why would it be my burden to change the mind of cultish freaks? It isn't.

Yet, day in and day out, you continue to try...go figure.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

no, you didn't.
Quoting the IC IG is NOT providing proof.

...to you.

Again...not sure how you are not getting rhis through your head...if it is not enough for you, I do not care. That is your problem,not mine. Why would it be my burden to change the mind of cultish freaks? It isn't.

Yet, day in and day out, you continue to try...go figure.

Hmm,no, not accurate. But whatever...

 

[Auld Phart]

no, you didn't.
Quoting the IC IG is NOT providing proof.

...to you.

Again...not sure how you are not getting rhis through your head...if it is not enough for you, I do not care. That is your problem,not mine. Why would it be my burden to change the mind of cultish freaks? It isn't.

YOU made the claim there is first hand information.

you have not linked to that first hand information.

Do I need to use building blocks to spell it out for you?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

Doesn't know what second-hand info means.



.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

YOU made the claim there is first hand information.

Correct. And i said why i think that. If you think that's not good enough,good for you. Your worthless opinion has been noted and filed with the others *flush*

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

Doesn't know what second-hand info means.



.

Apparently,the IC IG doesnt either. But you trump cultists? Yessir,you got it all figured out. Again. Amazing.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

Doesn't know what second-hand info means.



.

Apparently,the IC IG doesnt either. But you trump cultists? Yessir,you got it all figured out. Again. Amazing.

Why don't you show us the first-hand information you are talking about?

.

 

[mudwhistle]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

The whistleblower complaint and the phone call transcripts are two different types of evidence.

The whistleblower report is 3rd hand or hearsay whereas the transcript is firsthand.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

Doesn't know what second-hand info means.



.

Apparently,the IC IG doesnt either. But you trump cultists? Yessir,you got it all figured out. Again. Amazing.

Why don't you show us the first-hand information you are talking about?

.

Because I don't have it. Again...pay attention ... I believe the whistleblower had firsthand info. As stated by the IC IG. As corroborated by the apparently accurate and well annotated whistleblower report.

If that's not enough for you, good for you. Are you going to keep whining about it to me? I'm not your mommy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The whistleblower report is 3rd hand or hearsay

The IC IG says itherwise.

No rational person would believe a trump cultist pulling nonsense out of his ass over the IC IG, in this case.

 

[Auld Phart]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

Doesn't know what second-hand info means.



.

Apparently,the IC IG doesnt either. But you trump cultists? Yessir,you got it all figured out. Again. Amazing.

Why don't you show us the first-hand information you are talking about?

.

Because I don't have it. Again...pay attention ... I believe the whistleblower had firsthand info. As stated by the IC IG. As corroborated by the apparently accurate and well annotated whistleblower report.

If that's not enough for you, good for you. Are you going to keep whining about it to me? I'm not your mommy.

Because I don't have it.

You're taking someone else's word on the 'firsthand' information

Just like the whistleblower​

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

so, you're basing your comments on second hand information?

The whistleblower report and the transcript are second hand info?


And this is where you cultists are going to make your stand?

Hahahahaha

The whistleblower complaint and the phone call transcripts are two different types of evidence.

The whistleblower report is 3rd hand or hearsay whereas the transcript is firsthand.

Agreed..depending on which transcript you are referring to. The rough transcript provided by the White House was not verbatim....and thus removed from the source...the actual unredacted transcript is indeed, firsthand. What I'd love to hear..is the actual recordings..so we can measure nuance...the tone in the voices..the pauses for emphasis--that would be informative.

Whistle-blower's report is second-hand. Those who alerted the whistle-blower..were they to speak..would be 1st hand info.

Those persons..would be the actual leakers everyone is eager to hear..or not.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You're taking someone else's word on the 'firsthand' information

Yes, the IC IG. Correct. I.E., the authority on the matter. I should take the word of you delusional cultists instead? Heh heh

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You're taking someone else's word on the 'firsthand' information

Yes, the IC IG. Correct. I.E., the authority on the matter. I should take the word of you delusional cultists instead? Heh heh

Did the IG actually say that the whistle blower had first-hand information that is relevant to the inquiry?

.