Zone1 Say Goodbye to The Second Amendment--and most of the others as well. Ron Unz

PeterPilot

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2023
Messages
4,638
Reaction score
3,039
Points
1,938

Many of the MAGA types who used to strongly support the Second Amendment no longer do as they support the murder of Mr. Pretti

The article is rather long, but very well written.
 

Many of the MAGA types who used to strongly support the Second Amendment no longer do as they support the murder of Mr. Pretti

The article is rather long, but very well written.
Cognitive Dissonance.

OR, they don't think it will ever happen to them and so they don't care that it's happening to liberal Americans.

Perfect example is Kyle Rittenhouse. If the cops shot him for having that gun in his hands, ready to use it, how would the right feel? But because it was a liberal with his legal gun holstered, they are fine with it.

WACO they object to. A Democratic president going after a cult leader who's a pedophile. That they defended. But not Ms Good or this guy
 

Many of the MAGA types who used to strongly support the Second Amendment no longer do as they support the murder of Mr. Pretti

The article is rather long, but very well written.

Missourian candycorn have both started threads on the Branch Dividians. I wonder if they care more about liberals in MN or a cult leader who was a pedophile in Texas?
 
Which one is the second amendment? Is that the one that says you can shoot someone to death for stepping on your lawn or insulting you?
I've studied the BoR quite a bit, but am not familiar with that language there. Are you perhaps exaggerating or thinking wishfully?
 
Cognitive Dissonance.

OR, they don't think it will ever happen to them and so they don't care that it's happening to liberal Americans.

Perfect example is Kyle Rittenhouse. If the cops shot him for having that gun in his hands, ready to use it, how would the right feel? But because it was a liberal with his legal gun holstered, they are fine with it.

WACO they object to. A Democratic president going after a cult leader who's a pedophile. That they defended. But not Ms Good or this guy
A Democratic president going after a cult leader who's a pedophile. That they defended.
They did?

oh, DEMOCRATS defended them.

gotcha
 
It's called English.


What do you mean?
I mean that I cannot find anywhere in the BoR saying that one can shoot another for stepping on your lawn or insulting you.
 
Ron Unz is one of the reasons why we are in this situation.
 

Many of the MAGA types who used to strongly support the Second Amendment no longer do as they support the murder of Mr. Pretti

The article is rather long, but very well written.
It wasn’t a murder, it was a accidental shooting triggered by the accidental discharge of a badly designed pistol owned by Pretti.
 
Cognitive Dissonance.

OR, they don't think it will ever happen to them and so they don't care that it's happening to liberal Americans.

Perfect example is Kyle Rittenhouse. If the cops shot him for having that gun in his hands, ready to use it, how would the right feel? But because it was a liberal with his legal gun holstered, they are fine with it.

WACO they object to. A Democratic president going after a cult leader who's a pedophile. That they defended. But not Ms Good or this guy
You continue to make comparisons that are absurd, ones that we've batted down repeatedly.
Stop spouting bullshit.
 
Cognitive Dissonance.

OR, they don't think it will ever happen to them and so they don't care that it's happening to liberal Americans.

Perfect example is Kyle Rittenhouse. If the cops shot him for having that gun in his hands, ready to use it, how would the right feel? But because it was a liberal with his legal gun holstered, they are fine with it.

WACO they object to. A Democratic president going after a cult leader who's a pedophile. That they defended. But not Ms Good or this guy
Rittenhouse was the best case of self defense possible. The Pretti shooting was not lawful. The Goode shooting was lawful.
WACO was the massacre of children caused by Janet Reno and the Clintons
 
15th post
Rittenhouse was the best case of self defense possible. The Pretti shooting was not lawful. The Goode shooting was lawful.
WACO was the massacre of children caused by Janet Reno and the Clintons
Come on booboo prove me wrong
 
Rittenhouse was the best case of self defense possible. The Pretti shooting was not lawful. The Goode shooting was lawful.
WACO was the massacre of children caused by Janet Reno and the Clintons
I disagree regarding the Pretti shooting.
He had no business sticking his nose into a law enforcement action. With a gun in his waistband. Exhibiting the same anger he had a week earlier when he kicked out the tail light of an ICE vehicle.
It was justified.
 
I disagree regarding the Pretti shooting.
He had no business sticking his nose into a law enforcement action. With a gun in his waistband. Exhibiting the same anger he had a week earlier when he kicked out the tail light of an ICE vehicle.
It was justified.
The standard for use of deadly force is serious bodily injury or death must be imminent(going to happen right now). Pretti was disarmed and surrounded by 5 agents who had him restrained. So where is the imminent threat. It doesnt matter what he did the week before or even that he had gun. He didnt have it when shot. He should have been arrested.
 
The standard for use of deadly force is serious bodily injury or death must be imminent(going to happen right now). Pretti was disarmed and surrounded by 5 agents who had him restrained. So where is the imminent threat. It doesnt matter what he did the week before or even that he had gun. He didnt have it when shot. He should have been arrested.
I think, however, that it's possible that during the disarming, Pretti's Sig went off accidentally, which could have caused the agents to shoot him. Remember, we're talking split seconds and chaos here ...
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom