Satanism is the Origin of the New Age Occult

[SoCalSmurf]

1 Timothy 4:1. The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.



2 Corinthians 11:14. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

"And any teaching or doctrine that is pushed along side Lucifer/Satan should be dropped immediately. This is the enemy of Jesus Christ, who is trying to deceive and lead people into sin and deception before his time is up. Just like he deceived Eve, he baits people with promises of god-hood and ascension, if only they study esoteric knowledge and refuse to obey/follow/seek God. This is the same lie found in the first book of the Bible."

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gotta fear your god, gotta fear your lucifer, and with original sin, you're fucked up merely for arriving. Helluva belief system, useful for subjugating a population though.

 

[Moonglow]

Gotta fear your god, gotta fear your lucifer, and with original sin, you're fucked up merely for arriving. Helluva belief system, useful for subjugating a population though.

I was always scared of Godzilla..Couldn't stop dreaming about him...

 

[Fenton Lum]

Gotta fear your god, gotta fear your lucifer, and with original sin, you're fucked up merely for arriving. Helluva belief system, useful for subjugating a population though.

I was always scared of Godzilla..Couldn't stop dreaming about him...

Variation on the theme incorporating a lizard god motif.

 

[aris2chat]

1 Timothy 4:1. The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons.



2 Corinthians 11:14. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.

"And any teaching or doctrine that is pushed along side Lucifer/Satan should be dropped immediately. This is the enemy of Jesus Christ, who is trying to deceive and lead people into sin and deception before his time is up. Just like he deceived Eve, he baits people with promises of god-hood and ascension, if only they study esoteric knowledge and refuse to obey/follow/seek God. This is the same lie found in the first book of the Bible."

It mock religion, all religion, and Satan is just show.

It is a humanist philosophy

 

[mamooth]

Helen Blavatsky was a 19th-century Russian. She did have some influence on 70s New age crap, but because of the East Asian mumbo jumbo, not because of any single statement about Satan.

Anton Lavey? Whatever. The video kind of assumes that Lavey invented meditation and other concepts, and that since New Age features meditation, it must have come from Satanism. Nope. New Age and Church of Satan just both borrowed from the same old concepts.

Now Wicca, that was invented in early 20th century England, so that has nothing to do with any of that.

 

[SoCalSmurf]

Helen Blavatsky was a 19th-century Russian. She did have some influence on 70s New age crap, but because of the East Asian mumbo jumbo, not because of any single statement about Satan.

Anton Lavey? Whatever. The video kind of assumes that Lavey invented meditation and other concepts, and that since New Age features meditation, it must have come from Satanism. Nope. New Age and Church of Satan just both borrowed from the same old concepts.

Now Wicca, that was invented in early 20th century England, so that has nothing to do with any of that.

The New Age Movement is a lure into the deceiving spirits of the netherworld, through mediumship (channeling), astral projection, and spirit guides, with the false promise of enlightenment, divinity, and god-hood.

 

[aris2chat]

Helen Blavatsky was a 19th-century Russian. She did have some influence on 70s New age crap, but because of the East Asian mumbo jumbo, not because of any single statement about Satan.

Anton Lavey? Whatever. The video kind of assumes that Lavey invented meditation and other concepts, and that since New Age features meditation, it must have come from Satanism. Nope. New Age and Church of Satan just both borrowed from the same old concepts.

Now Wicca, that was invented in early 20th century England, so that has nothing to do with any of that.

Lavey.....best place to meditate is on the [toilet]

 

[HaShev]

The Irony of this post in picturing
Anton LaVey is that Rome mocked religion in the same manner and lifted up the image of a false prophet as the first fallen messiah you were warned to avoid.
Rev 13:13 And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men.
So the RCC during Ishtar(easter) procession
go into the cave at the Bascillica and light a candle (with a bic lighter) and come out claiming a "great wonder" occured as the candle was lit from "he that maketh fire come down from heaven".
Calling Jesus that very satan figure of
Rev 13.
But nothing like John 6:66 From this time many of his disciples turned back and no longer followed him....
because he placed himself high like Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12-17.
Just proves my point that they wrote the adversary character as a satire in the same way todays anti church
(like Levay Satanists)satirize the RCC practices and rituals or similar to when the hockey web site profile purposely placed Miroslav Satan as the 666th profile.
So in essence the early founding church was a satanic (adversary) church which is why they even talk about such church back then existing, probably as a mock or satire of the righteous priests and Temple or they were referring to Baal or Mithraic temples that existed which the church did mask.

Proof Roman church was the church of Satanism:
If you look at emulations today at how today's Satanists mock the church and it's rituals and holidays, then you get an idea at what Rome created was liken to Levay's satanic church.
Mocking the faith they were opposition to:
1)calling their christ Jesus, steming from the enscribed Greek IeSous (the swine).
Swine are forbidden especially in the temple.
So was a bastard child (Deut), so they used the Illigitimate son of the Harlot Mary as the main image of the satanic idol.
2)calling him the lamb of passover which was the Egyptian idol god, that label is also a bad thing.
3)creating a new non Jewish name for a claimed Jewish character, SIMILAR to calling a messianic figure by a non Hebrew term Christos (predated word used for Krishna).
4)placing the figure's lineage through all the harlots of the Bible.
5)claiming Jesus the nemesis of God- Lucifer the morning star son of Baal
in Rev 22:16.
6)claiming him the gatekeeper of hell in Rev 1 & 9.
7)claiming his kingdom in death not in life.
8)using the mithraic and the baal crosses,
Mithras who's enemy was the Night (Evening Star).
9)calling him the scarab (dung beetle).
10) calling him the Apollyon not to bring peace but to bring division and burning up of our planet.
11)breaking all 10 commands through the image.
12)reinventing the holidays
13)creating new book and new God in place of.
14)made the anointed priests and leaders the bad guys in the twisted accts.
15)made Jesus the responsible accessory to the killing of righteous John the Baptist.
16)used the offshoot cult (hanotzrim) to create the satanic church-which had the same luciferous rays of light sun worship.
17)used underworld death cult teachings opposing the God of Life & his messenger of life-creating the opposition to life for their kingdom in death.

Clearly they created an opposite-adversary & accuser (sawtawn) version in mockery liken to today's satanist.

Hence we are instructed to LEARN FROM EMULATIONS TO SEE HOW THINGS WORK OR COME TO BE=to get understanding and prevent similar mistakes or deceptions.

 

[aris2chat]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

 

[BreezeWood]

.
satan is dead, 4th century christians need a new book.

 

[HaShev]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

You do understand IESous didn't exist to have died. The son of mary died around 82-85BC, Yehuda the Galilean 6bc, Theudas by the Jordan 45 ad. Your 60 years is way off for the Yeshu son of Mary figure and proves my point.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Gotta fear your god, gotta fear your lucifer, and with original sin, you're fucked up merely for arriving. Helluva belief system, useful for subjugating a population though.

And yet I am free as a bird.
Fear Lucifer, trust God.

 

[The Irish Ram]

.
satan is dead, 4th century christians need a new book.

Satan never dies. He is spirit. Spirits do not die.

 

[aris2chat]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

You do understand IESous didn't exist to have died. The son of mary died around 82-85BC, Yehuda the Galilean 6bc, Theudas by the Jordan 45 ad. Your 60 years is way off for the Yeshu son of Mary figure and proves my point.

>> Within these texts Jesus is referred to twice. In the first instance, Jesus is mentioned in the period in which the Jews of Judea were governed by the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate: "About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared." (Antiquities, Book 18).<<

>>In Josephus’ second reference to Jesus he describes the high priest Ananus, "Convened the Sanhedrin (the highest Jewish religious court/governing body). He had brought before them the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, who was called James, and some other men, whom he accused of having broken the law, and handed them over to be stoned." (Antiquities, Book 20).<<

>>Annals in A.D. 116. On one page, he described the execution of "Christus" (Christ) by Pontius Pilate and provides one of the earliest non-Biblical accounts of Christians, "Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind" (Annals, Book 15).<<

>>Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome....[5]<<

>>They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food – but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.[10]<<

 

[SoCalSmurf]

.
satan is dead, 4th century christians need a new book.

I have witnessed demons with my own two eyes and ears. You can not convince me that Satan is dead.

 

[SoCalSmurf]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

You do understand IESous didn't exist to have died. The son of mary died around 82-85BC, Yehuda the Galilean 6bc, Theudas by the Jordan 45 ad. Your 60 years is way off for the Yeshu son of Mary figure and proves my point.

The Son of God died before he was even born? That makes a lot of since...duh. Do you not know that BC stands for "Before Christ"?

 

[HaShev]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

You do understand IESous didn't exist to have died. The son of mary died around 82-85BC, Yehuda the Galilean 6bc, Theudas by the Jordan 45 ad. Your 60 years is way off for the Yeshu son of Mary figure and proves my point.

>> Within these texts Jesus is referred to twice. In the first instance, Jesus is mentioned in the period in which the Jews of Judea were governed by the Roman procurator Pontius Pilate: "About this time there lived Jesus, a wise man, if indeed one ought to call him a man. For he was one who performed surprising deeds and was a teacher of such people as accept the truth gladly. He won over many Jews and many of the Greeks. He was the Messiah. And when, upon the accusation of the principal men among us, Pilate had condemned him to a cross, those who had first come to love him did not cease. He appeared to them spending a third day restored to life, for the prophets of God had foretold these things and a thousand other marvels about him. And the tribe of the Christians, so called after him, has still to this day not disappeared." (Antiquities, Book 18).<<

>>In Josephus’ second reference to Jesus he describes the high priest Ananus, "Convened the Sanhedrin (the highest Jewish religious court/governing body). He had brought before them the brother of Jesus the so-called Christ, who was called James, and some other men, whom he accused of having broken the law, and handed them over to be stoned." (Antiquities, Book 20).<<

>>Annals in A.D. 116. On one page, he described the execution of "Christus" (Christ) by Pontius Pilate and provides one of the earliest non-Biblical accounts of Christians, "Consequently, to get rid of the report, Nero fastened the guilt and inflicted the most exquisite tortures on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome, where all things hideous and shameful from every part of the world find their centre and become popular. Accordingly, an arrest was first made of all who pleaded guilty; then, upon their information, an immense multitude was convicted, not so much of the crime of firing the city, as of hatred against mankind" (Annals, Book 15).<<

>>Nero fastened the guilt ... on a class hated for their abominations, called Christians by the populace. Christus, from whom the name had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of Tiberius at the hands of ... Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome....[5]<<

>>They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food – but food of an ordinary and innocent kind.[10]<<

You are being intellectually dishonest.
You know this argument has been proven false without refuting the facts proving it false.
Your mistake is due to not researching Josephus yourself and just taking every other idiots word for the claims of the books of Josephus.
Josephus accounts of Jesus are proven placed in at a later date probably by Eusebius who was known as the great liar who often forged books. I say this because early copies have no mention of Jesus and it's not until the time of Constantine and Eusebius thst it magically appears out of context as if placed in and forced in.
Have some common sense Josephus being a Jew writing about a Jewish Rabbi to a Jewish audience does not use the non Hebrew name Jesus- only a LATER Christian would use the IESUS NAME. Also Josephus being Jewish not Christian nor follower would ever call him "the christ".
Josephus mentions the many figures used for the Jesus image (as does the book of acts mention the other christs) but actually never mentions Jesus at all which is odd being I did a lineage search on Josephus and I was the only one to connect the dots that he was related distant wise to KING Jannaeus lineage who's wife Salome (friend /follower) of Yeshu son of Mary of 100bc was supposed to be related to Yeshu. ODD since Josephus doesn't even mention Yeshu who the RCC favors in it's trinity of christs used to make the Jesus character.

Fact: all Jewish characters maintain their Hebrew translated name in Josephus and NT except mysteriously Jesus (IeSous) and some apostles name changes because compiled figures need new names.

 

[HaShev]

You do understand that revelations was written some 60+yrs after Jesus death?

You do understand IESous didn't exist to have died. The son of mary died around 82-85BC, Yehuda the Galilean 6bc, Theudas by the Jordan 45 ad. Your 60 years is way off for the Yeshu son of Mary figure and proves my point.

The Son of God died before he was even born? That makes a lot of since...duh. Do you not know that BC stands for "Before Christ"?

How can your Christ be born in 6bc before himself born, answer: they moved back the date to fit King Herods story who died 4bc, however Lysanias also in the era detailed died in 35bc. Census was in 7bc, so that pushback date failed. This is why they don't teach the historical and burned books.

Now you used the term son of God, can you please tell us the mystery father's name that the church never dares utters?
MAURY Povich wants to know.

 

[BreezeWood]

.
satan is dead, 4th century christians need a new book.

Satan never dies. He is spirit. Spirits do not die.

.

Satan never dies. He is spirit. Spirits do not die.

how sad are 4th century christians, satan is dead the Almighty put an end to them. the same for all evil, death - especially spiritual for anything living in the Everlasting.