Sandy Hook after action report is a waste of time, not one measure would have stopped the attack....

Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


Not my heroes....I am responding to a post by someone else pointing out that the government is capable of killing it's citizens...either through incompetence...as in the Waco stand off, or murderous intent...as the 100 million murdered people around the world by their governments...just for communism and socialism, show......
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


Not my heroes....I am responding to a post by someone else pointing out that the government is capable of killing it's citizens...either through incompetence...as in the Waco stand off, or murderous intent...as the 100 million murdered people around the world by their governments...just for communism and socialism, show......

Yes they were criminals and they had weeks to surrender. So what?
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....

They died because their parents had them in with a bunch of criminals who wouldn't surrender.
 
So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.

Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......

You know that they can have a gun right? I just want them to make a smart decision about it.

And many are dead from carrying.
 
Were they abusing children more than the government agents who burned the children alive? And again...had they wished to arrest the leader....he went into town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then......

So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....

They died because their parents had them in with a bunch of criminals who wouldn't surrender.


No...they died because the assault on the compound started a fire that burned those children alive.....bad calls made by government officials....
 
Brain...you are the one who would rather women be raped than stop the rape with a gun....

No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......

You know that they can have a gun right? I just want them to make a smart decision about it.

And many are dead from carrying.


Not many...a few...very few.....and not even close to how many stop violent criminal attack because they are carrying a gun....and in many states they can't carry a gun because the gun grabbers have used the law to block that right....
 
So they should have just let them abuse children and break laws all they wanted. I see. You really love criminals.


What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....

They died because their parents had them in with a bunch of criminals who wouldn't surrender.


No...they died because the assault on the compound started a fire that burned those children alive.....bad calls made by government officials....

Bad call by their parents. The kids were among criminals and being abused. That is bad parenting.
 
What part of "had they wanted to arrest the leader...he went to town all by himself all the time and they could easily have arrested him then." didn't you get.......

I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....

They died because their parents had them in with a bunch of criminals who wouldn't surrender.


No...they died because the assault on the compound started a fire that burned those children alive.....bad calls made by government officials....

Bad call by their parents. The kids were among criminals and being abused. That is bad parenting.


Of course it is...their deaths were directly caused by the feds....
 
No, you are trying to sell guns, not save women from rape. We've discussed before and only a tiny number are even defendable with a gun. Your answer to rape would make no difference.


But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......

You know that they can have a gun right? I just want them to make a smart decision about it.

And many are dead from carrying.


Not many...a few...very few.....and not even close to how many stop violent criminal attack because they are carrying a gun....and in many states they can't carry a gun because the gun grabbers have used the law to block that right....

Oh exactly how many women are stopping violent criminal attack with a gun? I think you are talking out of your butt. Most people will never need a gun. Neither you or I have ever needed one. That should make you question all the crap the gun people feed you.
 
I'm not in law enforcement. Maybe they were concerned of a shootout with lots of innocent people around. They had weeks to surrender and didn't. They were bad people breaking the law. These are your heroes?


From the reports I saw...the nut job would walk from town back to the compound....by himself....at least once a week......so if they didn't want a "Shoot out" they could have picked him up then.....but they needed a big operation to keep their budget level....and those children died because of it.....

They died because their parents had them in with a bunch of criminals who wouldn't surrender.


No...they died because the assault on the compound started a fire that burned those children alive.....bad calls made by government officials....

Bad call by their parents. The kids were among criminals and being abused. That is bad parenting.


Of course it is...their deaths were directly caused by the feds....

Bad parenting.
 
But there are women who can and do use guns to stop violent rape.......you don't want those rapes stopped since you don't want those women to have those guns.......and again...guns are the most effective way to stop stranger rape.......

You want all women who can be raped to be raped....since you don't want them to use guns to stop the rapes having a gun would stop......

When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......

You know that they can have a gun right? I just want them to make a smart decision about it.

And many are dead from carrying.


Not many...a few...very few.....and not even close to how many stop violent criminal attack because they are carrying a gun....and in many states they can't carry a gun because the gun grabbers have used the law to block that right....

Oh exactly how many women are stopping violent criminal attack with a gun? I think you are talking out of your butt. Most people will never need a gun. Neither you or I have ever needed one. That should make you question all the crap the gun people feed you.


Yeah.....because you have never needed a gun that obviously means no one else has ever needed one either.......since all those stories of crime...rapes, robberies, murders, beatings, stabbings....those are all just fairy tales......
 
When have I said any of that? I've simply pointed out that many women are putting themselves in more danger by carrying. And also that guns aren't the cure for rape as only a tiny number are defendable with a gun. You are just trying to sell guns, not fix a problem.


No, I want women who want a gun to protect themselves to have those guns and thousands of rapes that could be stopped with guns is not a "tiny" number...not to those women.....and many women are keeping themselves safer by carrying a gun......

You know that they can have a gun right? I just want them to make a smart decision about it.

And many are dead from carrying.


Not many...a few...very few.....and not even close to how many stop violent criminal attack because they are carrying a gun....and in many states they can't carry a gun because the gun grabbers have used the law to block that right....

Oh exactly how many women are stopping violent criminal attack with a gun? I think you are talking out of your butt. Most people will never need a gun. Neither you or I have ever needed one. That should make you question all the crap the gun people feed you.


Yeah.....because you have never needed a gun that obviously means no one else has ever needed one either.......since all those stories of crime...rapes, robberies, murders, beatings, stabbings....those are all just fairy tales......

The need is greatly exaggerated. This is a very safe country. What radio guy got you so paranoid btw?
 

Forum List

Back
Top