Sanders Closes On Her Thighness Clinton- Biden Supports Sanders

We're not talking about elites like Hillary. We are talking about the average rank and file middle class guy just grinding it out day to day. You know, the kind of people Obama says he cares about. They would be in the soup line by now

Middle Class guys wouldn't have access to this kind of information to start with.

Can you actually name someone who was sent to prison for 'using the wrong e-mail server"?

Thanks.
 
Why is it you keep hoping someone else beats Hillary for you?

Oh,wait, because all your candidates are pathetic lunatics... that's why.
It's her own people throwing her under the bus AGAIN. I love it.

If Democrats want someone else, that's their business, isn't it? Whoever they DO pick will still beat whatever mutant you pick.

You guys might want to be careful what you wish for.
 
We're not talking about elites like Hillary. We are talking about the average rank and file middle class guy just grinding it out day to day. You know, the kind of people Obama says he cares about. They would be in the soup line by now

Middle Class guys wouldn't have access to this kind of information to start with.

Can you actually name someone who was sent to prison for 'using the wrong e-mail server"?

Thanks.

Look Joe, doesn't matter the content, it matters the classification. Average Joe would be indicted already for handling classified information the way she has/did

-Geaux
 
We're not talking about elites like Hillary. We are talking about the average rank and file middle class guy just grinding it out day to day. You know, the kind of people Obama says he cares about. They would be in the soup line by now

Middle Class guys wouldn't have access to this kind of information to start with.

Can you actually name someone who was sent to prison for 'using the wrong e-mail server"?

Thanks.

Ok- There WILL be a test

-Geaux
================

Ex-officials prosecuted for mishandling gov’t info see ‘double standard’ in Clinton case

Ex-officials who were prosecuted and had their lives upended for allegedly mishandling sensitive records are accusing the Obama administration of a "double-standard" in its approach to the Hillary Clinton email scandal.
This administration has charged more people under the Espionage Act, a World War I-era law once used to go after major breaches, than any other in history. While the FBI is looking into Clinton's server amid revelations of state secrets potentially passing through it, some critics -- including those charged under that act -- doubt the Democratic presidential candidate will get the same treatment.
"It's a double standard," said John Kiriakou, a former CIA counter-terrorism operative who spent two years in federal prison and three additional months under house arrest this year for leaking the name of a covert CIA official involved in "enhanced interrogation techniques."
Ex-officials prosecuted for mishandling gov’t info see ‘double standard’ in Clinton case | Fox News
 
Look Joe, doesn't matter the content, it matters the classification. Average Joe would be indicted already for handling classified information the way she has/did

So can you name someone who was indicted for simply not using the right e-mail to send something?

"It's a double standard," said John Kiriakou, a former CIA counter-terrorism operative who spent two years in federal prison and three additional months under house arrest this year for leaking the name of a covert CIA official involved in "enhanced interrogation techniques."

So he didn't merely use the wrong e-mail address. He gave out classified information to someone who shouldn't have had it with the intention of diseminating the information.

So one more time. Do you have an example of someone who was prosecuted for using the wrong e-mail server?
 
Look Joe, doesn't matter the content, it matters the classification. Average Joe would be indicted already for handling classified information the way she has/did

So can you name someone who was indicted for simply not using the right e-mail to send something?

"It's a double standard," said John Kiriakou, a former CIA counter-terrorism operative who spent two years in federal prison and three additional months under house arrest this year for leaking the name of a covert CIA official involved in "enhanced interrogation techniques."

So he didn't merely use the wrong e-mail address. He gave out classified information to someone who shouldn't have had it with the intention of diseminating the information.

So one more time. Do you have an example of someone who was prosecuted for using the wrong e-mail server?

As expected, you failed the test

There is no wrong email server. There are only 2 right ones. The governments low side (UNCLASS) and the high side (CLASSIFIED)

As for Hillary, she shouldn't had it either and her intent was to disseminate the information as well

-Geaux
 
As expected, you failed the test

There is no wrong email server. There are only 2 right ones. The governments low side (UNCLASS) and the high side (CLASSIFIED)

As for Hillary, she shouldn't had it either and her intent was to disseminate the information as well

So essentially, you don't have a case on point of someone using private e-mail to do governmetn work who was prosecuted for it.

The best you have is someone who actually did something illegal, letting out information that the government had classified as secret.

duly noted you couldn't make the argument. Maybe you need to hit that Google again, but this time, actually READ the article before you post it, 'kay?
 
As expected, you failed the test

There is no wrong email server. There are only 2 right ones. The governments low side (UNCLASS) and the high side (CLASSIFIED)

As for Hillary, she shouldn't had it either and her intent was to disseminate the information as well

So essentially, you don't have a case on point of someone using private e-mail to do governmetn work who was prosecuted for it.

The best you have is someone who actually did something illegal, letting out information that the government had classified as secret.

duly noted you couldn't make the argument. Maybe you need to hit that Google again, but this time, actually READ the article before you post it, 'kay?

There is no argument required. She violated government law by having classified information on a non-classified system. Period

-Geaux
 
There is no argument required. She violated government law by having classified information on a non-classified system. Period

Yeah, except no one gets prosecuted for that, that's the point. Maybe you get a reprimand.

The thing is, you guys think it's fine that Bush lied about WMD's and got 5000 Americans needlessly killed by "OH MY GOD, HILLARY USED THE WRONG EMAIL". Which is even more pathetic than 'OH MY GOD, BILL LIED ABOUT A BLOW JOB!!!"

Hey, here's a crazy idea. INstead of trying to make up crimes hoping that gets Hillary out of the race, how about coming up with non-crazy candidates who don't sound like they cheer for Mr. Potter when they watch "It's a Wonderful Life"?
 
Can you actually name someone who was sent to prison for 'using the wrong e-mail server"?

there is always a first time for everything.., something i'll bet you never learned!! :up:

Well, no. You see, you'd have to get a jury to convict, and good luck finding a Jury of Hillary-haters in DC.

If the FBI had something, they'd have announced it by now. Now they are just trying to save face.
 
Why is it you keep hoping someone else beats Hillary for you?

Oh,wait, because all your candidates are pathetic lunatics... that's why.
It's her own people throwing her under the bus AGAIN. I love it.

If Democrats want someone else, that's their business, isn't it? Whoever they DO pick will still beat whatever mutant you pick.

You guys might want to be careful what you wish for.
Liberals don't know what they want, Hillary is proof. Lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top