Ravi
Diamond Member
The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
That is all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't say shit about checking immigration status, you stupid fucking ****.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
State's are not required to verify anyone's immigration status unless they are applying for a job with the State (ditto cities). In fact they aren't required to find out if you've committed any crimes.Your stupidity really has no bounds, does it?
A state can keep you from purchasing a firearm if you have been convicted of a felony.
A state can keep you from going to church, where children attend services, if you have been convicted of a sex-crime.
Shall I go on, or would you like to take this opportunity to add the words "I am" to your reply of "Wrong"???
Guys she will never admit she is wrong. She is not arguing with you because she believes any of the shit she says. She is arguing with you because she is a shameless Obama Partisan that will tolerate any thing he does in the name of Hope and change. She is not even worth arguing with. We have repeatedly devastated her arguments with cold hard facts and still she will not admit being wrong. Move on.
There is no reason a city cannot be a sanctuary city. Look at it as a DADT policy.
State's are not required to verify anyone's immigration status unless they are applying for a job with the State (ditto cities). In fact they aren't required to find out if you've committed any crimes.Guys she will never admit she is wrong. She is not arguing with you because she believes any of the shit she says. She is arguing with you because she is a shameless Obama Partisan that will tolerate any thing he does in the name of Hope and change. She is not even worth arguing with. We have repeatedly devastated her arguments with cold hard facts and still she will not admit being wrong. Move on.
There is no reason a city cannot be a sanctuary city. Look at it as a DADT policy.
Never ever seen someone so completely clueless about constitutional law.
State's are not required to verify anyone's immigration status unless they are applying for a job with the State (ditto cities). In fact they aren't required to find out if you've committed any crimes.
There is no reason a city cannot be a sanctuary city. Look at it as a DADT policy.
Never ever seen someone so completely clueless about constitutional law.
She's clueless about EVERYTHING. I have not seen her be on the correct side of a single issue, simply because she is A) Partisan B) stupid C) unwilling to look at facts D) retarded
Never ever seen someone so completely clueless about constitutional law.
She's clueless about EVERYTHING. I have not seen her be on the correct side of a single issue, simply because she is A) Partisan B) stupid C) unwilling to look at facts D) retarded
I tend to believe the people left fighting for Obama like Ravi is, are the pure ideologues that will never change, never admit defeat, and never say I was wrong. 20 years from now, when we are looking around at the Economic ruins of what used to be the greatest most prosperous and powerful nation on earth. She will still be saying It was all Bushes fault.
Obviously you need this "win" to complete yourself. I forgot to speak to you like a literal four year old. Yes, if you are convicted of a crime, or judged mentally disturbed (your problem, perhaps?) you lose some rights.I didn't say shit about checking immigration status, you stupid fucking ****.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
You said that states couldn't limit constitutional rights. They can.
You're wrong. You're pwned.
Live with it.
Thank you.Obviously you need this "win" to complete yourself. I forgot to speak to you like a literal four year old. Yes, if you are convicted of a crime, or judged mentally disturbed (your problem, perhaps?) you lose some rights.I didn't say shit about checking immigration status, you stupid fucking ****.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
You said that states couldn't limit constitutional rights. They can.
You're wrong. You're pwned.
Live with it.
Obviously you need this "win" to complete yourself. I forgot to speak to you like a literal four year old. Yes, if you are convicted of a crime, or judged mentally disturbed (your problem, perhaps?) you lose some rights.I didn't say shit about checking immigration status, you stupid fucking ****.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
You said that states couldn't limit constitutional rights. They can.
You're wrong. You're pwned.
Live with it.
Great in theory; but not in real world, Rs don't have it in them. They'll just move on.Yessirreebob! This is a Charlie Foxtrot for the P-BO Peeps in the worst way. And once control of the senate is lost, you can expect the investigations are going to come BOILING out like a hive of ravenous army ants to strip the lib carcass clean.
also while you are right Arizona law does try to regulate immigration. It does so by mimic Federal law. Which there is Legal precedent already telling us is ok.
No, there is not a legal precedent saying that. You just made that one up. And no, Arizona's law does not mimic federal law. Anyone who says that has not read the law itself.
This is a program states and cities can chose to participate in...it is not mandatory.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
Yet they do just that.
San Francisco Sheriff Wants to Opt Out of Program Reporting Undocumented Immigrants to Federal Authorities
I think that trumps your that is all with the real facts.
The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
This is a program states and cities can chose to participate in...it is not mandatory.The Federal government cannot compel states and cities to check immigration status. You can whine, you can lie, you can cry...but that is the truth of the matter.
That is all.
Yet they do just that.
San Francisco Sheriff Wants to Opt Out of Program Reporting Undocumented Immigrants to Federal Authorities
I think that trumps your that is all with the real facts.
Sanctuary City Question Leaves Gibbs Stammering , page 1
This is to funny. I told you Obama had opened up a can of worms he didn't want opened by suing over his law.
It is a very logical and legitimate question.
If Arizona can not pass a law that mimics Federal Immigration law, because of Federal Supremacy on the issue of Border control and immigration. Then why is the Obama Admin not suing every Sanctuary City. All who have passed laws in direct conflict with standing Federal Immigration law.
Gotta love Gibbs non answer.
I can't wait to here the excused the dream up for this one.
It is a voluntary program, states are not required to participate.