Sanctuary cities are bringing a knife to a gunfight.

Ray9

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2016
2,707
4,474
1,970
“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.
 
Whether illegals can or cannot be transported to sanctuary cities is somewhat moot.
Irregardless, Trump has already won by pointing out the major hypocrisy of the social justice cowardly Democrats.
Trump does indeed, play chess.
 
Last edited:
Since Obama we bus them all over the Midwest and southern states so what is wrong with sending them to where they will be welcomed with open arms?....
:71:
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

By Jove, I do believe that you got something there!
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

No they don't. Non-Americans don't vote, so it doesn't matter which counties they go to.

But they will be counted in the census, which determines how many representatives the districts will have and how much federal money the state will receive.
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea

Well, then.
Get those INS buses rolling!
Whatz the holdup?
Coolio.....:banana:
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea

Well, then.
Get those INS buses rolling!
Whatz the holdup?
Coolio.....:banana:

It's actually up to the refugees where THEY decide to go. Many have family or friends here already, and communities standing ready to help them get settled.
 
“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea

Well, then.
Get those INS buses rolling!
Whatz the holdup?
Coolio.....:banana:

It's actually up to the refugees where THEY decide to go. Many have family or friends here already, and communities standing ready to help them get settled.

So you're selling us that illegals can not only stay but can tell us where they can or cannot be taken.
Don't you see anything crazy about your pitch?
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

No they don't. Non-Americans don't vote, so it doesn't matter which counties they go to.

But they will be counted in the census, which determines how many representatives the districts will have and how much federal money the state will receive.

Are ya really this stupid?
Or do you think we are?
They'll eventually get amnesty ,like always.
So which is it?
 

So why is Pelousy squealing like a stuck pig? We should stick all 22M of them in the Haight...let them shovel the shit off the streets on their way home from the welfare office. I wonder how many would try to jump Fancy Nancy's fence and swim in her pool? :lol:
 
Since Obama we bus them all over the Midwest and southern states so what is wrong with sending them to where they will be welcomed with open arms?....
:71:
but help them politically no.

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea

“Give me your tired, your poor,

Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,

The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.

Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:

I lift my lamp beside the golden door.”

In a national emergency where the President of the United States struggles to maintain border security, those words from the statue of Liberty still have meaning but they have been replaced by liberal democrats and prostituted cheap-labor republicans in sanctuary cities with “not in my back yard!” The poor and the huddled masses from South and Central America that were baited by politicians to drag innocent children across thousands of miles of dangerous territory are being met by rich sanctuary cities with “get off my lawn!”

In a contemporary cultural atmosphere where rich liberals commit fraud to get their kids into top colleges and celebrities stage fake hate crimes to incite riots, it seems fitting that the tempest –tossed homeless are being told by moneyed, sanctuary city leaders that there’s no room at the inn. What people are seeing as this fiasco unfolds is anybody’s guess but we can only hope that the entire country hasn’t been swindled of its common sense by a corrupted, propagandizing mass media that has failed to overthrow the results of the last election.

Given that about half the country is viewing reality through the distorted lens of Trump Derangement goggles it’s doubtful that the breathtaking hypocrisy of sanctuary cities is recognized for the fraud that it is. It’s also doubtful many know that though there were a few sanctuary cities in the US before Trump, the majority of them sprang up after the election in order to hinder attempts at border security.

Like many strategies that backfire, sanctuary cities must now rally against the president’s suggestion that asylum seekers be escorted to and concentrated in the sanctuary cities that thumbed their noses at immigration laws and invited them to overrun US borders.

All the love and welcoming packaged in those invitations is suddenly drying up as sanctuary cities realize that putting your money where your mouth is has consequences. The rest of the country sees this and recognizes the hypocrisy. There’s a humorous aspect to this that can’t be overstated.

Sanctuary cities refusing asylum seekers are bringing a knife to a logical gunfight as they oppose the president. The drooling apoplexy of Trump haters can’t stop his re-election.

Except that the sanctuary cities aren't refusing asylum seekers. They're welcoming them.

Seattle Mayor Responds to President Trump: My City 'Isn't Afraid of Immigrants'

What they're saying: Mayors of "sanctuary cities" welcome Trump's latest immigration idea

Well, then.
Get those INS buses rolling!
Whatz the holdup?
Coolio.....:banana:

It is FASCINATING! I know, you know, and even the Leftists know, on this issue alone, they are going to get HAMMERED in the next election.

Add to that the little tidbit that (I guess Trump does play chess)--------------> unless he intervenes, (which he won't) the guidelines for sequestration returns on THIS budget. It MUST be cut 125 BILLION this time, and more next time.

So what did he do, lol. He pushed defense spending through the roof, so when they cut it, it comes back to where he probably wanted it...……..BUT...……...if they cut defense spending, they also have to cut OTHER spending, lol by a formula of 1 to 1. And they can't do ANYTHING about it unless they have a veto proof majority, lol. Not the entitlements get cut, but the do-rei-me they give to their constituents for votes, ya know, like Obama phones, reparations, and stuff like that.

In essence, he is going to FORCE congress to eliminate programs that are no longer needed, or they aren't going to have their slush fund! And, since he is in control of the special funds that he got for the wall, they can't cut that. Oh whoa is they!

You are going to hear a Leftist scream coming from Washington, that you have NEVER heard before------------------>because they used to do all the suckering, and now THEY JUST GOT SUCKERED, lol. And watch after they have to cut 125 billion from the budget, now those nifty DEBATES go-------------->

Hey Bernie, Khmala, Cory, where ya getting the money for all these ideas?

ANSWER------------> We are going to make the RICH pay their fairshare!

LAUGHTER, as President Trump pulls out that if they confiscate EVERYTHING from the richest 20% of the country, you still can't pay for what they want, MEANING---------->onstage, he will PROVE that free healthcare is NOT free, you are actually paying for it yourself, and it is MORE expensive then the bill you already have, and it is NOT anywhere as good!

LEFTISTS---------->your screwed, if you even get that far after the spying allegations are proven-)
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

No they don't. Non-Americans don't vote, so it doesn't matter which counties they go to.

But they will be counted in the census, which determines how many representatives the districts will have and how much federal money the state will receive.
No they won't the citizenship question WILL appear on the form.
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

No they don't. Non-Americans don't vote, so it doesn't matter which counties they go to.

But they will be counted in the census, which determines how many representatives the districts will have and how much federal money the state will receive.
You don’t knowshit CANADIAN.
 
Dems: "They're only here to do the work that Muricans won't do."

Also dems: "They'll overload and drain our social services!"
you all miss the bigger point, the dems wanted them to go to conservative towns to then use them to take out conservative candidates. They don't need them in all blue cities.

No they don't. Non-Americans don't vote, so it doesn't matter which counties they go to.

But they will be counted in the census, which determines how many representatives the districts will have and how much federal money the state will receive.
No they won't the citizenship question WILL appear on the form.


I tend to agree with you Sarge. The question was there until Obama had it removed, so for decades it existed on the form. There is/was no compelling reason to remove it, and there IS a compelling reason to re-instate it.

Now, the courts give a damn how PISSED Americans are, but if it was legal before and no Supreme Court decision changed it, (which is factual) the anger of the citizenry over what is happening, will have an affect on at least, the "original intent" judges, of which they now supposedly have 5, and that tells me, the Left is NOT going to be happy campers-)
 

Forum List

Back
Top