We know blacks owned blacks, but you can't handle the fact free blacks bought family members who were still enslaved.
Anthony johnson didn't own any family members you liar! And neither did most black slave owners (yeah, I'm sure there was 1 or 2).
And who said anything about the FIRST slave owner?
Sorry chump, but there is information out there and it shows that blacks bought family members and other blacks to eventually free. Anthony Johnson is fake news.
Hoax Alert: First Slave Owner in America WAS NOT a Black Man
First off, it should be noted that the man portrayed in the above image isn't Anthony Johnson, but more ironically,
Lewis Hayden. It is ironic because Hayden was actually an African-American leader who escaped with his family from slavery in Kentucky. Before the American Civil War, he and his wife aided numerous fugitive slaves on the
Underground Railroad, often sheltering them at their house.
Secondly, while the case of Anthony Johnson and John Casor was not a matter of the first slave owner, it might have been the first civil case involving slavery. At the very least this is the first known example of a black man owning either indenture servants or slaves in the colonies. Slaves had been here since 1619, and all slaves had been "legal" slaves (and thus their owners "legal" slave owners) since the first law legalizing slavery passed. The first man to be considered a slave by a court of law was
John Punch, and his owner Hugh Gwyn considered the first slave owner by a court of law.
In conclusion, a black man did own slaves in Jamestown Va., but he was NOT the first slave owner. The first "20 odd" slaves arrived in 1619 on a Dutch boat and were then sold to Jamestown residents.
Hoax Alert: First Slave Owner in America WAS NOT a Black Man | Lead Stories
Some of us black folk study this stuff. Nothing you said was true. I addressed everything you said we were scared to look at. You posted some white supremacist lies boy.