ClosedCaption
Diamond Member
- Sep 15, 2010
- 53,233
- 6,723
- 1,830
Can you honestly say that any of this would have happened if she had cooperated?And the girl is not responsible for hers?You're wrong. The cop is responsible for his actions.
Yes she is but she is not responsible for his tho. You keep saying that she is and that's wrong.
Like I said, I'm not excusing what the cop did. But you have to place the blame where it belongs. She instigated the whole thing by disobeying a cop. If she would have cooperated none of this would have happened.
Once again you claim that she is responsible for his actions and he bears no responsibility at all.
Also, you keep repeating you're not excusing his actions then excuse his actions again hy saying she is responsible for the cops actions and not the cop.
Like I said, you are describing no responsibility and follow it up with "I didn't say he's not responsible"
Doesn't matter, the cop is responsible for his actions. Also there are other ways of dealing with it but because his name is Officer Slam he's known for acting just the way he did. I bet you think the name came from several incidents in which the students were responsible for his actions so many times he got the nickname
The answer is no. That is what I'm saying. I suppose that if someone robbed a store and the police shot him 27 times, you could rightly say that he may have over reacted. But if the crook hadn't robbed the store, he wouldn't have PLACED HIMSELF in a situation where he would have gotten shot. She willfully disobeyed a police officer. It's called resisting arrest. SHE placed herself in that position. No one else. Therefore, she is ultimately responsible for what happens, whether or not the cop over reacted. Do you understand now?
Yea she placed herself in that position. But she is not responsible for a grown man's actions no matter how many circles you speak in