In a way it's not off topic lord long.... Because Putin says he was afraid of NATO countries getting closer, as if these countries with the rest of NATO would attack him, and there have been no attempts for any such thing....?^ off-topic deflection![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In a way it's not off topic lord long.... Because Putin says he was afraid of NATO countries getting closer, as if these countries with the rest of NATO would attack him, and there have been no attempts for any such thing....?^ off-topic deflection![]()
From their perspective it is not.That's Russian propaganda, and you likely know it is....
Agree 100%. It is just absurd to mindlessly label Russia as the bad actor yet not knowing why.All of this ^ is true, yet on the other hand, we are still enemies with them. Im always down to **** over Russia. Youll never beat the 1980's out of me. Im stuck in that mindset permanently.![]()
I agree.Maybe. But it doesn’t justify their criminal behavior.
The last nation to invade Russia was a Russian ally. Russia and Germany allied to invade and destroy Poland. Russia had been providing Germany with war material, oil and food for long before that. Russia provided nazi Germany facilities to develop all the weapons the Germans used to attack the WAllies.So, what nations have invaded Russia lately? Please list them for us.
After that, we can list the nations Russia has invaded. It will be a long list.
Does Russia think NATO expansion is to attack Russia? Why would Russia be worried about the NATO expansion?
Ukraine was not being accepted in to NATO, when he attacked Ukraine. NATO didn't think the Ukraine was ready to be a part of it....
Now though, Putin has lead NATO to think again.
theconversation.com
It is not fear driving Pootin’. It’s a security issue. Imagine Russia setting up a military base in, say, Cuba. That would clearly be something we would not be happy with.In a way it's not off topic lord long.... Because Putin says he was afraid of NATO countries getting closer, as if these countries with the rest of NATO would attack him, and there have been no attempts for any such thing....?
Yeah, acting like Russia had no reason to do it is stupid. They had plenty of reasons to do it. Still, **** Russia.Agree 100%. It is just absurd to mindlessly label Russia as the bad actor yet not knowing why.

We didn't blow up Cuba and the innocent people there in to smithereens to settle the problem....It is not fear driving Pootin’. It’s a security issue. Imagine Russia setting up a military base in, say, Cuba. That would clearly be something we would not be happy with.
But we came close.We didn't blow up Cuba and the innocent people there in to smithereens to settle the problem....
Yeah, and with good reason we came close....!But we came close.
The generals got it wrong, and told Kennedy that Castro didn't have the launch codes, so it was safe to invade.
from the OP>Except Russia was the aggressor.
Each High Contracting Party shall refrain from participating in, or supporting, any actions directed against the other High Contracting Party, and shall not conclude any treaties with third countries against the other Party. Neither Party shall allow its territory to be used to the detriment of the security of the other Party.
You were doing OK up to that point .This was when we could have changed the trajectory. But nothing was done due to ignorance and the outright rejection of Cold War strategic norms among the new foreign affairs establishment.
from the OP>
And, of course, there was Ukraine. Never in the realm of international relations was there a state that acted so consistently against its national interests. It put itself in grave danger when it announced its intention to join NATO in 2004, violating the 1997 Treaty on Friendship between Ukraine and the Russian Federation. This Treaty specifically addressed Ukrainian neutrality, stating at section 6, page 148:
Would the United States accept the presence of Russian military bases on its borders? As a matter of fact, it did not accept them even 1,500 miles from its borders. In 1983, President Reagan ordered the invasion of Grenada due to concerns that the construction of an airport by Cubans could potentially be utilized by Soviet forces.
20 yrs prior was the cuban missile crisis .......
~S~
Noted foreign relations scholar, luiza, disagrees with me. How will I sleep at night?!?You were doing OK up to that point .
But then on whose authority or popular vote might you have acted differently ?
The Bully Boy's Club?
The, NeoCons Know Best , club?
Jesus …We didn't blow up Cuba and the innocent people there in to smithereens to settle the problem....
So? Ukraine didn’t case Russia. Russia invaded Ukraine and waged its war of aggression largely against the civilian population.from the OP>
And, of course, there was Ukraine. Never in the realm of international relations was there a state that acted so consistently against its national interests. It put itself in grave danger when it announced its intention to join NATO in 2004, violating the 1997 Treaty on Friendship between Ukraine and the Russian Federation. This Treaty specifically addressed Ukrainian neutrality, stating at section 6, page 148:
Would the United States accept the presence of Russian military bases on its borders? As a matter of fact, it did not accept them even 1,500 miles from its borders. In 1983, President Reagan ordered the invasion of Grenada due to concerns that the construction of an airport by Cubans could potentially be utilized by Soviet forces.
20 yrs prior was the cuban missile crisis .......
~S~