Rules for Spilling American Blood

candycorn

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2009
Messages
121,717
Reaction score
64,557
Points
2,605
Location
Occupied Arizona
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
Haven't we tried the "surge" thing before? If we put boots on the ground, any notion of a quick exit will become a fantasy.
 
Haven't we tried the "surge" thing before? If we put boots on the ground, any notion of a quick exit will become a fantasy.
All the more reason to not go in in the fist place.... But as the old Native American (borrowed by Churchill) goes, if you’re going to get caught in a storm--this one of our own choosing--turn into it so it ends quicker.

You’re 100% right; noting over there is worth a drop of American blood. But that threshold has been crossed.
 
All the more reason to not go in in the fist place.... But as the old Native American (borrowed by Churchill) goes, if you’re going to get caught in a storm--this one of our own choosing--turn into it so it ends quicker.

You’re 100% right; noting over there is worth a drop of American blood. But that threshold has been crossed.
My understanding is that our main objective was to stop whatever nuclear capabilities they are developing. It seems to me like bombs alone should be enough to cripple that capability at least for decades to come. I don't understand why it has to be deeper than that. We've crippled their economy and blown up their nuclear program. If we just left, right now, they're already in a position where they'd be crippled for decades. They're not going to be building nukes any time soon.

All that's left now is for us to decide how many more resources to waste.
 
Last edited:
All the more reason to not go in in the fist place.... But as the old Native American (borrowed by Churchill) goes, if you’re going to get caught in a storm--this one of our own choosing--turn into it so it ends quicker.

You’re 100% right; noting over there is worth a drop of American blood. But that threshold has been crossed.
There`s only one reason to go there and that`s to bury the Epstein/Trump pedophile stories. It seems to be working.
Guardian
Of
Pedophiles
Is what the GOP has become.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
Rule #1: Never have been in the military.
Rule #2: None of your relatives are in the military.
Rule #3: No one in your family has ever been in the military.

If the first three rules are ok, fire away. Who cares. If they are captured or die they are losers after all.*

*Actual Trump statements.
 

Rules for Spilling American Blood​



4 1/2.......let them win.

~S~
 
Rule #1: Never have been in the military.
Rule #2: None of your relatives are in the military.
Rule #3: No one in your family has ever been in the military.

If the first three rules are ok, fire away. Who cares. If they are captured or die they are losers after all.*

*Actual Trump statements.

Did Trump Call Fallen Soldiers 'Suckers' and 'Losers'?

In sum, the claim stemmed from a story by The Atlantic, which relied on anonymous, second-hand reports of Trump's alleged words; there was no independent footage or documented proof to substantiate the in-question comments; and Trump vehemently denies that he once called service members "losers" and "suckers." While it was certainly possible that he said those things, Snopes was unable to independently verify the claim.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
Libs are globalists when it suits their agenda

And isolationists the rest of the time
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.

Once again trying to hold Trump to rules you didn't hold Biden, Obama, Clinton or any others to.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
So youre OK with a nuke exploding in an American city.
 
15th post
I'm saying you are selectively caring about them because of your TDS and the usual SJW idiot opportunism.

Of Fvck off...

Here is what I said in 2016 and 2015:

Nothing in Iraq was ever worth a drop of American blood.

Last week nothing in the ME was worth spilling American blood. yesterday nothing happening in the ME was worth spilling American blood. Tomorrow the situation will not change despite rhetoric and jingoism.

No. I want those who think we should spill American blood and treasure in unwinnable wars to be the ones who are spilling the blood.

I think what happened to the people living (and still live) under dictators worldwide is unfortunate but it is not America’s fight; nothing in Iraq was worth one drop of American blood.

No way we should even be talking about risking one drop of American blood in Syria.

In the meantime; nobody has come up with one good reason to spill a drop of American blood over there since 2003.

The only thing selective is your nicotine addled memory.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom