Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.Not after either. Scotus got it wrong. It's not the first time. I can think of two others.Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Marty occasionally joins threads to derail them. He's in full derail glory this morning.
I asked a perfectly legitamate question.
Most certainly the states are not allowed to establish a state religion. Where the hell do you get an idea like that?
Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
Oh, the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the States before the 14th amendment. The States could criminalize being a jew if they'd wanted to. Or suppress free speech. Or set up voting rules to prevent black folks from voting.
Which might explain Moore's favor of eliminating every amendment after the 10th.
He's still living rent free in your heads, which is sad and comical.
Laughing.....the election was the day before *yesterday*. Moore hasn't even conceded yet. Give it a few more before you start throwing up excuses to flee the conversation.
Also, this man received the blessing of the GOP and Trump. Even in defeat, they own his message.
"Blessing"
Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
Oh, the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the States before the 14th amendment. The States could criminalize being a jew if they'd wanted to. Or suppress free speech. Or set up voting rules to prevent black folks from voting.
Which might explain Moore's favor of eliminating every amendment after the 10th.
He's still living rent free in your heads, which is sad and comical.
Laughing.....the election was the day before *yesterday*. Moore hasn't even conceded yet. Give it a few more before you start throwing up excuses to flee the conversation.
Also, this man received the blessing of the GOP and Trump. Even in defeat, they own his message.
"Blessing"
Yup. Funding and unqualified support for the accused pedophile. They own that support even after Moore lost. Just like Trump owns support for every nasty provision in the Obamacare repeals that he supported.
Just because you lose doesn't mean your support for awful vanishes. It merely means you failed to implemented awful.
http://www.wnd.com/2006/12/39271/Lets see....imposing a religious test to hold office in which Muslims should not be allowed to hold elected office because 'Islamic law is simply incompatible with our law'
Muslim Ellison should not sit in Congress
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/07/...rders-halt-to-same-sex-marriage-licenses.htmlBanning same sex couples from their right to marry, despite the Supreme Court recognizing such a right in the Obergefell ruling....
Top Alabama Judge Orders Halt to Same-Sex Marriage Licenses
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...ters-guide-alabama-senate-election/934965001/That transgender people don't have rights.
Roy Moore, Doug Jones and the issues: A voter's guide to the Alabama Senate election
That gay people shouldn't be allowed to have children
Here Are Some Pretty Wild Things Roy Moore Has Said Over The Years
Lets see....imposing a religious test to hold office in which Muslims should not be allowed to hold elected office because 'Islamic law is simply incompatible with our law'
Muslim Ellison should not sit in Congress
If Ellison does not recognise the right of people to live outside the influence of Islam he should not be allowed to sit in Congress, IMO.
Banning same sex couples from their right to marry, despite the Supreme Court recognizing such a right in the Obergefell ruling....
Top Alabama Judge Orders Halt to Same-Sex Marriage Licenses
SCOTUS made a horrible decision and I agree with Moore.
That transgender people don't have rights.
Roy Moore, Doug Jones and the issues: A voter's guide to the Alabama Senate election
Transgender people are mentally ill and in so far as their mental illness goes, they have no rights to impose it on anyone else by their conduct or other claims to being treated as a transexual in some particular way.
Again, I agree, and none of these are Constitutional rights whatsoever other than the bullshit gay marriage right that WILL eventually be reversed.
Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.Not after either. Scotus got it wrong. It's not the first time. I can think of two others.
So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Marty occasionally joins threads to derail them. He's in full derail glory this morning.
I asked a perfectly legitamate question.
Not in a thread about Moore it isn't. Not when there was no discussion of guns. You're trying to hijack the thread, avoid a discussion of Moore and make this about anything else.
No thank you. If you want to discuss guns, start a thread on it.
Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
Oh, the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the States before the 14th amendment. The States could criminalize being a jew if they'd wanted to. Or suppress free speech. Or set up voting rules to prevent black folks from voting.
Which might explain Moore's favor of eliminating every amendment after the 10th.
He's still living rent free in your heads, which is sad and comical.
Laughing.....the election was the day before *yesterday*. Moore hasn't even conceded yet. Give it a few more before you start throwing up excuses to flee the conversation.
Also, this man received the blessing of the GOP and Trump. Even in defeat, they own his message.
"Blessing"
Yup. Funding and unqualified support for the accused pedophile. They own that support even after Moore lost. Just like Trump owns support for every nasty provision in the Obamacare repeals that he supported.
Just because you lose doesn't mean your support for awful vanishes. It merely means you failed to implemented awful.
Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Marty occasionally joins threads to derail them. He's in full derail glory this morning.
I asked a perfectly legitamate question.
Not in a thread about Moore it isn't. Not when there was no discussion of guns. You're trying to hijack the thread, avoid a discussion of Moore and make this about anything else.
No thank you. If you want to discuss guns, start a thread on it.
He made a statement about States being able to ignore the bill of rights, specifically the 1st amendment and establishment of religion. I asked him if that applies to the 2nd as well.
It's a valid question.
Oh, the Bill of Rights didn't apply to the States before the 14th amendment. The States could criminalize being a jew if they'd wanted to. Or suppress free speech. Or set up voting rules to prevent black folks from voting.
Which might explain Moore's favor of eliminating every amendment after the 10th.
He's still living rent free in your heads, which is sad and comical.
Laughing.....the election was the day before *yesterday*. Moore hasn't even conceded yet. Give it a few more before you start throwing up excuses to flee the conversation.
Also, this man received the blessing of the GOP and Trump. Even in defeat, they own his message.
"Blessing"
Yup. Funding and unqualified support for the accused pedophile. They own that support even after Moore lost. Just like Trump owns support for every nasty provision in the Obamacare repeals that he supported.
Just because you lose doesn't mean your support for awful vanishes. It merely means you failed to implemented awful.
They supported an Accused candidate, just like your side supported an accused Clinton when he was impeached for perjury.
Funny how all this could have been avoided if the story broke during the Republican primary, instead of when Moore was locked into the race and the republicans couldn't do anything about it. it's almost like the reporter and his supported cared more about the Senate seat than the whole accused kid toucher thing...
THE PEOPLE FOR ROY MOORE!!!!!....ROY MOORE FOR OFFICE IN 1950!!!!Roy Moore turns refusal to concede into religious crusade: ‘Immorality sweeps over the land’
A day after losing the Senate race in Alabama to Democrat Doug Jones, Roy Moore has issued a new statement refusing to concede the election. But it wasn’t your typical post-election statement.
It was a four-minute fire-and-brimstone video about abortion, same-sex marriage, school prayer, sodomy, and “the right of a man to claim to be a woman and vice versa.”
“We are indeed in a struggle to preserve our republic, our civilization and our religion and to set free a suffering humanity,” Moore said. “Today, we no longer recognize the universal truth that God is the author of our life and liberty. Abortion, sodomy and materialism have taken the place of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.”
In the video issued by the campaign Wednesday evening, Moore said his campaign is still waiting for the official vote count from Alabama officials. The Republican candidate framed the election as not just a political contest but also a dire ideological battle for “the heart and soul of our country.”
You've been removed as Chief Justice twice. You lost two primaries for the governorship. You lost the Senate race to a Democrat in a solid red state. Maybe God isn't as hot on you as you'd think. Go away.
Because it isn't relevant and because SCOTUS does not have the authority to legislate.Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.Not after either. Scotus got it wrong. It's not the first time. I can think of two others.Most certainly the states are not allowed to establish a state religion. Where the hell do you get an idea like that?
Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Why don't you just answer the question?
It’s a protected liberty.Wouldn't that be more like a sexual preference?When it involves the level of hypocrisy that Roy Moore has shown, it should bend us all out of shape.
And if your religious beliefs force you to ignore basic freedoms and tenets of our society, you should not be elected to office.
So you leap from the presumption of guilt for Moore based on unsupported allegations, to banning all those who think like him (Biblical Christians?) from politics for opposing what you consider to be basic freedoms and tenets of society?
Since when did fucking some guy up the ass become a moral right?
Homosexual sex is not a moral right?
Moore needs to read the Constitution’s case law, acknowledge it as the law of the land, and respect the rule of law.Moore needs to read the Constitution
Conservatives: masters of the red herring fallacy.Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.Not after either. Scotus got it wrong. It's not the first time. I can think of two others.
So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Marty occasionally joins threads to derail them. He's in full derail glory this morning.
I asked a perfectly legitamate question.
Not in a thread about Moore it isn't. Not when there was no discussion of guns. You're trying to hijack the thread, avoid a discussion of Moore and make this about anything else.
No thank you. If you want to discuss guns, start a thread on it.
And by law of the land you mean to say state law because the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment only restricts the Federal Government from establishing a national religion and from interfering with the established religions of the states of which there are presently none.Moore needs to read the Constitution’s case law, acknowledge it as the law of the land, and respect the rule of law.Moore needs to read the Constitution
And it’s not just Moore, that’s something every conservative needs to do.
No. It's a sexual preference. Sort of like doggie style.It’s a protected liberty.Wouldn't that be more like a sexual preference?When it involves the level of hypocrisy that Roy Moore has shown, it should bend us all out of shape.
And if your religious beliefs force you to ignore basic freedoms and tenets of our society, you should not be elected to office.
So you leap from the presumption of guilt for Moore based on unsupported allegations, to banning all those who think like him (Biblical Christians?) from politics for opposing what you consider to be basic freedoms and tenets of society?
Since when did fucking some guy up the ass become a moral right?
Homosexual sex is not a moral right?
Citizens have the right to make personal decisions about intimate aspects of their lives absent interference from the state:
“When sexuality finds overt expression in intimate conduct with another person, the conduct can be but one element in a personal bond that is more enduring. The liberty protected by the Constitution allows homosexual persons the right to make this choice.” (Lawrence v. Texas (2003))
Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.
Marty occasionally joins threads to derail them. He's in full derail glory this morning.
I asked a perfectly legitamate question.
Not in a thread about Moore it isn't. Not when there was no discussion of guns. You're trying to hijack the thread, avoid a discussion of Moore and make this about anything else.
No thank you. If you want to discuss guns, start a thread on it.
He made a statement about States being able to ignore the bill of rights, specifically the 1st amendment and establishment of religion. I asked him if that applies to the 2nd as well.
It's a valid question.
No, you're trying to make this a gun conversation. Sigh....again.
No thank you.
He's still living rent free in your heads, which is sad and comical.
Laughing.....the election was the day before *yesterday*. Moore hasn't even conceded yet. Give it a few more before you start throwing up excuses to flee the conversation.
Also, this man received the blessing of the GOP and Trump. Even in defeat, they own his message.
"Blessing"
Yup. Funding and unqualified support for the accused pedophile. They own that support even after Moore lost. Just like Trump owns support for every nasty provision in the Obamacare repeals that he supported.
Just because you lose doesn't mean your support for awful vanishes. It merely means you failed to implemented awful.
They supported an Accused candidate, just like your side supported an accused Clinton when he was impeached for perjury.
Funny how all this could have been avoided if the story broke during the Republican primary, instead of when Moore was locked into the race and the republicans couldn't do anything about it. it's almost like the reporter and his supported cared more about the Senate seat than the whole accused kid toucher thing...
Why Marty....are you insinuating yet *another* conspiracy theory?
And of course, if you have evidence that the Post reporter sat on the finished story until the republican primaries were over, present it. Or you can continue to insinuate a conspiracy you can't back up factually.
Because it isn't relevant and because SCOTUS does not have the authority to legislate.Dude, you are so far afield it isn't even funny.Not after either. Scotus got it wrong. It's not the first time. I can think of two others.Before the 14th amendment is was certainly possible.
So are you saying States can ban gun ownership?
Why don't you just answer the question?
