Rosenstein conspiracy, sedition, treason exposed

[Asclepias]

Wait...so now not only do the Trumpers love anonymous sources but SECOND hand anonymous sources...and they want to use that to fire the guy that Trump can't fire without looking like he's obstructing justice.

Oh...

The irony of it is amazing. If Drumpf fires Rosenstein, we are going to have yet another Drumpf appointee and republican that thinks Drumpf is unfit. Not too mention Drumpf will be getting this information from a guy he called a liar as reported by a newspaper he claims is fake news. Has anything like this every happened before?

 

[Skylar]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

 

[Skylar]

Is discussing invoking the 25th Amendment treason? If so...why have it?

No. No its not. Treason is betraying one's country.

Trump isn't the country. Nor is applying the 25th amendment a betryal. With 'sedition' just being hysteric nonsense.

Calling the application of the 25th amendment 'treason' makes as much sense as accusing someone who discusses impeachment of sedition. The president is not the country.

 

[Skylar]

Deputy director of the Department of Justice Rod Rosenstein autjored a report on why former FBI director James Comey should be fired and then advised Presient Donald Trump he should fire FBI director Comey.

Once the president, exercising his legal Authority, fired Comey it is being reported that Rosenstein plotted, planned, and attempted to recruit Cabinet Members to participate in a conspiracy where he, Rosenstein, would secretly record the president and then have his band of conspirators use the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office!

Rosenstein reportedly discussed wearing 'wire,' invoking 25th Amendment against Trump

'A bombshell report published Friday afternoon claims Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last year suggested secretly recording President Trump to expose chaos in the White House and enlisting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from office. Rosenstein adamantly denied the accusations.'

Yeah, discussing constitutional processes isn't 'treason' or 'sedition' anymore than discussing impeachment would be. And you can't 'conspire' to do something that's perfectly legal.

Once again, you're so far down the conspiracy rabbit hole that you're insisting that merely *discussing* the application of perfectly legal and constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death.

You're quite insane.

 

[Hellokitty]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?

 

[Skylar]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?

Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.

That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.

 

[Mike473]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?

Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.

That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.

I agree. I never understood why the left was so upset about the Obama birth certificate controversy. People were simply discussing the constitutional process of demonstrating citizenship.

 

[Skylar]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?

Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.

That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.

I agree. I never understood why the left was so upset about the Obama birth certificate controversy. People were simply discussing the constitutional process of demonstrating citizenship.

Oh, the birther conspiracy was monumentally stupid. There was as much evidence that Obama was born in orbit as born in Kenya. With overwhelming evidence affirming he was born in Hawaii.

With the Registar of Hawaii verifying that the vital records of Hawaii affirm Obama was born in Hawaii, in court, twice.

But birthers were never guilty of 'treason' or 'sedition' or 'conspiracy'. They were merely stupid as a box of rocks, forwarding a conspiracy that was not only fact free, it was contradicted by overwhelming evidence.

 

[Asclepias]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?

Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.

That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.

I agree. I never understood why the left was so upset about the Obama birth certificate controversy. People were simply discussing the constitutional process of demonstrating citizenship.

They were upset because Obama had already been vetted regarding his birth. Having fools like Drumpf bait his followers with claims of a big reveal that resulted in a nothing burger would get anyone upset except Drumpfsexuals.

 

[ColonelAngus]

This is a trap set by the Times and those who want trump gone.

He should not fire Rosenstein until the investigation is over, then he should fire Rosenstein and Sessions.

Seriously, there is no way the times would publish anything that would help,Trump.

I call BS on this....I THINK THEY THINK it will lead to obstruction charges because Rosenstein named the special investigatior.

This is fake news. Don’t fall for this shit.

 

[The Purge]

Gregg Jarrett: Rod Rosenstein's coup attempt to depose Trump should not go unpunished
Fox News ^ | September 21, 2018 | Gregg Jarrett

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s actions, as recounted by the New York Times Friday, are the equivalent of an attempted coup -- a plot to overthrow the president.

As the Times reveals, Rosenstein was furious that Democrats blamed him for the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

Rosenstein, who had volunteered to write the firing memorandum, was “regretful and emotional.” His behavior was described as “erratic.”

He blamed Trump.

So, in an apparent act of vengeance, he proposed secretly recording the president to try to gain damaging information about him.

He solicited others to wear wires, including Andrew McCabe, who was later fired as Assistant FBI Director. Rosenstein is said to have discussed recruiting cabinet members to depose Trump under the 25th Amendment.

All of this is reportedly evidenced in memos, including those written by McCabe.

Friday afternoon, in response to the Times story, Michael R. Bromwich, Andrew McCabe’s attorney issued this statement for the record:

"Andrew McCabe drafted memos to memorialize significant discussions he had with high level officials and preserved them so he would have an accurate, contemporaneous record of those discussions. When he was interviewed by the Special Counsel more than a year ago, he gave all of his memos -- classified and unclassified -- to the Special Counsel's office. A set of those memos remained at the FBI at the time of his departure in late January 2018. He has no knowledge of how any member of the media obtained those memos."

Rosenstein strongly denied that the facts recounted by the Times.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

Talking to Russians is also legal but the #resistance is convinced that it is treason and a conspiracy...

And if Trump fires the deep state Rosenstein creep that would be legal too

 

[GWV5903]

Rosenstein needs to be fired today as well as Sessions, there is no one on this planet that can defend the cesspool that is Washington!

The LMSM can hypnotize so many weak minded Liberals it’s astounding! Next to Trump Derangment Syndrome it’s the second leading diagnosis for mental illnesses...

 

[Lakhota]

Rosenstein was only joking. What's the problem?

 

[Skylar]

Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.

It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.

And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.

Talking to Russians is also legal but the #resistance is convinced that it is treason and a conspiracy...

And if Trump fires the deep state Rosenstein creep that would be legal too

Having your campaign meet with a Russian government operative to collect dirt on your opponent as part of the Russian government's efforts to support your candidate?

While that same Russian Government is actively attacking the United States to support the same candidate.

And that candidate is both lying his ass off to cover up the meeting with the Russian Operative and compelling others to lie about it? And trying to shut down the investigation looking into that meeting?

While that candidate is also publicly expressing his hope that the Russian government will conduct MORE attacks on the United States?

That's hardly 'talking with the Russians'.

 

[Skylar]

Gregg Jarrett: Rod Rosenstein's coup attempt to depose Trump should not go unpunished
Fox News ^ | September 21, 2018 | Gregg Jarrett

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s actions, as recounted by the New York Times Friday, are the equivalent of an attempted coup -- a plot to overthrow the president.

As the Times reveals, Rosenstein was furious that Democrats blamed him for the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

Rosenstein, who had volunteered to write the firing memorandum, was “regretful and emotional.” His behavior was described as “erratic.”

He blamed Trump.

So, in an apparent act of vengeance, he proposed secretly recording the president to try to gain damaging information about him.

He solicited others to wear wires, including Andrew McCabe, who was later fired as Assistant FBI Director. Rosenstein is said to have discussed recruiting cabinet members to depose Trump under the 25th Amendment.

All of this is reportedly evidenced in memos, including those written by McCabe.

Friday afternoon, in response to the Times story, Michael R. Bromwich, Andrew McCabe’s attorney issued this statement for the record:

"Andrew McCabe drafted memos to memorialize significant discussions he had with high level officials and preserved them so he would have an accurate, contemporaneous record of those discussions. When he was interviewed by the Special Counsel more than a year ago, he gave all of his memos -- classified and unclassified -- to the Special Counsel's office. A set of those memos remained at the FBI at the time of his departure in late January 2018. He has no knowledge of how any member of the media obtained those memos."

Rosenstein strongly denied that the facts recounted by the Times.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...

Discussing legal and constitutional processes isn't a 'coup attempt'. Anymore than discussing impeachment is.

Nor is it 'sedition' or 'treason' or 'conspiracy'. As you can't conspire to do something that's completely legal. Any American can discuss any legal or constitutional process without punishment from the government.

And if we are to invoke the 25th amendment or impeachment.....we damn well better discuss it first.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

Having your campaign meet with a Russian government operative to collect dirt on your opponent as part of the Russian government's efforts to support your candidate?

While that same Russian Government is actively attacking the United States to support the same candidate.

And that candidate is both lying his ass off to cover up the meeting with the Russian Operative and compelling others to lie about it? And trying to shut down the investigation looking into that meeting?

While that candidate is also publicly expressing his hope that the Russian government will conduct MORE attacks on the United States?

That's hardly 'talking with the Russians'.

Yeah, and the Mueller inquisition will prove it any day now....

I guess my point is that it's useless to talk about legality and the holy constitution, it's simply part of the dirty war between the deep state swamp and the insane orange regime and in this case I'm on the side of the very stable genius in chief

Trump now has a good excuse to fire the Rosenstein traitor

 

[cwise76]

And the circus act continues.......**** I’m getting sick of this scumbags bullshit.

 

[Lumpy 1]

So you want Drumpf to fire the people he hired after claiming he hires the best people?

/---/ So you hire what you think is a good employee and then he's caught stealing office supplies and money from the petty cash drawer. What are you going to od then?

The first thing I would do is wonder why I keep claiming I hire the best people when I am continually firing people I picked.

I've noticed that the all the anal retentives are quite upset about it...

 

[basquebromance]

the deep state is in deep shit!