Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The irony of it is amazing. If Drumpf fires Rosenstein, we are going to have yet another Drumpf appointee and republican that thinks Drumpf is unfit. Not too mention Drumpf will be getting this information from a guy he called a liar as reported by a newspaper he claims is fake news. Has anything like this every happened before?Wait...so now not only do the Trumpers love anonymous sources but SECOND hand anonymous sources...and they want to use that to fire the guy that Trump can't fire without looking like he's obstructing justice.
Oh...
Is discussing invoking the 25th Amendment treason? If so...why have it?
Deputy director of the Department of Justice Rod Rosenstein autjored a report on why former FBI director James Comey should be fired and then advised Presient Donald Trump he should fire FBI director Comey.
Once the president, exercising his legal Authority, fired Comey it is being reported that Rosenstein plotted, planned, and attempted to recruit Cabinet Members to participate in a conspiracy where he, Rosenstein, would secretly record the president and then have his band of conspirators use the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office!
Rosenstein reportedly discussed wearing 'wire,' invoking 25th Amendment against Trump
'A bombshell report published Friday afternoon claims Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein last year suggested secretly recording President Trump to expose chaos in the White House and enlisting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him from office. Rosenstein adamantly denied the accusations.'
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?
Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.
That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?
Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.
That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.
I agree. I never understood why the left was so upset about the Obama birth certificate controversy. People were simply discussing the constitutional process of demonstrating citizenship.
They were upset because Obama had already been vetted regarding his birth. Having fools like Drumpf bait his followers with claims of a big reveal that resulted in a nothing burger would get anyone upset except Drumpfsexuals.Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
By legal you mean like discussion of a constitutional process like the discussions TRUMP had with nut job Comey before TRUMP fired him?
Discussing the application of the 25th amendment specifically. The 25th amendment is a perfectly legal constitutional process. And any American can discuss it without punishment.
That Trump supporters would insist that even *discussing* the application of constitutional processes is a crime punishable by death merely demonstrates the breadth and depth of their disconnect from reality. And their disdain for the Constitution.
I agree. I never understood why the left was so upset about the Obama birth certificate controversy. People were simply discussing the constitutional process of demonstrating citizenship.
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
Again, folks......if everything that the NYT article claims about Rosenstein is true, its not conspiracy, sedition nor treason. But discussion of a constitutional process.
It would be as 'seditious' as discussing impeachment, another constittutional process.
And you can't commit conspiracy to do something that's legal.
Talking to Russians is also legal but the #resistance is convinced that it is treason and a conspiracy...
And if Trump fires the deep state Rosenstein creep that would be legal too
Gregg Jarrett: Rod Rosenstein's coup attempt to depose Trump should not go unpunished
Fox News ^ | September 21, 2018 | Gregg Jarrett
Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s actions, as recounted by the New York Times Friday, are the equivalent of an attempted coup -- a plot to overthrow the president.
As the Times reveals, Rosenstein was furious that Democrats blamed him for the firing of FBI Director James Comey.
Rosenstein, who had volunteered to write the firing memorandum, was “regretful and emotional.” His behavior was described as “erratic.”
He blamed Trump.
So, in an apparent act of vengeance, he proposed secretly recording the president to try to gain damaging information about him.
He solicited others to wear wires, including Andrew McCabe, who was later fired as Assistant FBI Director. Rosenstein is said to have discussed recruiting cabinet members to depose Trump under the 25th Amendment.
All of this is reportedly evidenced in memos, including those written by McCabe.
Friday afternoon, in response to the Times story, Michael R. Bromwich, Andrew McCabe’s attorney issued this statement for the record:
"Andrew McCabe drafted memos to memorialize significant discussions he had with high level officials and preserved them so he would have an accurate, contemporaneous record of those discussions. When he was interviewed by the Special Counsel more than a year ago, he gave all of his memos -- classified and unclassified -- to the Special Counsel's office. A set of those memos remained at the FBI at the time of his departure in late January 2018. He has no knowledge of how any member of the media obtained those memos."
Rosenstein strongly denied that the facts recounted by the Times.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Having your campaign meet with a Russian government operative to collect dirt on your opponent as part of the Russian government's efforts to support your candidate?
While that same Russian Government is actively attacking the United States to support the same candidate.
And that candidate is both lying his ass off to cover up the meeting with the Russian Operative and compelling others to lie about it? And trying to shut down the investigation looking into that meeting?
While that candidate is also publicly expressing his hope that the Russian government will conduct MORE attacks on the United States?
That's hardly 'talking with the Russians'.
The first thing I would do is wonder why I keep claiming I hire the best people when I am continually firing people I picked./---/ So you hire what you think is a good employee and then he's caught stealing office supplies and money from the petty cash drawer. What are you going to od then?So you want Drumpf to fire the people he hired after claiming he hires the best people?
