Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,360
- 1,830
Romney has never been a good anything.
Except a thief.
Would you just shut the fuck up and get my mother fucking latte?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Romney has never been a good anything.
Except a thief.
Obama was a great governor !
Oh wait.....
Well, Obama successfully ran a business.....
Oh wait.....
Obama knows how to read off a teleprompter (and when he goes off script we get to see how he really feels and he has to make commercials to say that he does not really feel that way).
That is true.
Romney was a one-term governor with such a bad record that he didn't even try running for a second term.
Economy
Jobs
Debt
Budget
Deficit
Yes, we all remember Bush.
Economy
Jobs
Debt
Budget
Deficit
Why Mitt Romney Had Such a Bad Record on Jobs in Massachusetts | The Nation
Why DidnÂ’t Mitt Romney Run for Reelection as Governor? | RedState
16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be A Really, Really Bad President
What's Mitt Romney Hiding in His Record as Governor - The Daily Beast
Foreign Policy experts in agreement about Mitt Romney
He looks the part, is the rights best option, and will do whatever the corporations tell him to do. Same as Bush.
Remember we were impressed with Bush and Chaney's business experience?
They didn't fuck us enough on Defense contractors and oil in Iraq, right at the end they let the bankers/wallstreet fuck us one good too. And now righties want to put Mr. Vulture Capital in the White House? They think his business experience qualifies him to be President? What a fucking joke!
Why Mitt Romney Had Such a Bad Record on Jobs in Massachusetts | The Nation
Why DidnÂ’t Mitt Romney Run for Reelection as Governor? | RedState
16 Reasons Why Mitt Romney Would Be A Really, Really Bad President
What's Mitt Romney Hiding in His Record as Governor - The Daily Beast
Foreign Policy experts in agreement about Mitt Romney
He looks the part, is the rights best option, and will do whatever the corporations tell him to do. Same as Bush.
Remember we were impressed with Bush and Chaney's business experience?
They didn't fuck us enough on Defense contractors and oil in Iraq, right at the end they let the bankers/wallstreet fuck us one good too. And now righties want to put Mr. Vulture Capital in the White House? They think his business experience qualifies him to be President? What a fucking joke!
Romney's business experience is immaterial when it comes to government and creating jobs. If anything his business experience will favor the wealthy and create more hardships for the middle class. Trickle down economics doesn't work. American corporations are currently investing more than they ever have and to think that the creation of jobs is dependent on corporations getting tax breaks, etc. which will cause them to create jobs is foolish. Romney may have been good as a corporate executive but the government is not a corporation.
He looks the part, is the rights best option, and will do whatever the corporations tell him to do. Same as Bush.
Remember we were impressed with Bush and Chaney's business experience?
They didn't fuck us enough on Defense contractors and oil in Iraq, right at the end they let the bankers/wallstreet fuck us one good too. And now righties want to put Mr. Vulture Capital in the White House? They think his business experience qualifies him to be President? What a fucking joke!
Romney's business experience is immaterial when it comes to government and creating jobs. If anything his business experience will favor the wealthy and create more hardships for the middle class. Trickle down economics doesn't work. American corporations are currently investing more than they ever have and to think that the creation of jobs is dependent on corporations getting tax breaks, etc. which will cause them to create jobs is foolish. Romney may have been good as a corporate executive but the government is not a corporation.
Only someone on the left would say this.
In business you make hard choices. Not everybody gets what they want.
Unless you really are interested in screwing your kids and grandkids, you'll take a second look at "Spend now, Ask questions later" Obama and wonder why we would ever put that moron back in the WH for another four years.
Romney's business experience is immaterial when it comes to government and creating jobs. If anything his business experience will favor the wealthy and create more hardships for the middle class. Trickle down economics doesn't work. American corporations are currently investing more than they ever have and to think that the creation of jobs is dependent on corporations getting tax breaks, etc. which will cause them to create jobs is foolish. Romney may have been good as a corporate executive but the government is not a corporation.
Only someone on the left would say this.
In business you make hard choices. Not everybody gets what they want.
Unless you really are interested in screwing your kids and grandkids, you'll take a second look at "Spend now, Ask questions later" Obama and wonder why we would ever put that moron back in the WH for another four years.
That's funny. Maybe even retarded. How many times did you vote for Bush? You know, that guy who fucked us really long time.
Economy
Jobs
Debt
Budget
Deficit
Yes, we all remember Bush.
That is what this election is about, dem-wit.
Not Romney's approval ratings from 6 years ago.
Voters want jobs, a stronger economy that cuts spending and adheres to a budget that trims our debt/deficit.
You can keep slinging bush's name around all you want.
It's been 4 fucking years. OWN SOMETHING.
Yes, we all remember Bush.
That is what this election is about, dem-wit.
Not Romney's approval ratings from 6 years ago.
Voters want jobs, a stronger economy that cuts spending and adheres to a budget that trims our debt/deficit.
You can keep slinging bush's name around all you want.
It's been 4 fucking years. OWN SOMETHING.
If there's one thing I dislike about pols, especially democrats, it's that they won't take responsibility for anything. I look at Obama and the dems trying to blame everyone and everything under the sun, I just can't respect 'em. No guts, no glory.
That is what this election is about, dem-wit.
Not Romney's approval ratings from 6 years ago.
Voters want jobs, a stronger economy that cuts spending and adheres to a budget that trims our debt/deficit.
You can keep slinging bush's name around all you want.
It's been 4 fucking years. OWN SOMETHING.
If there's one thing I dislike about pols, especially democrats, it's that they won't take responsibility for anything. I look at Obama and the dems trying to blame everyone and everything under the sun, I just can't respect 'em. No guts, no glory.
No point in discussing anything with Lakhota, he is a total partisan hack that sucks off the democrats at every chance, he has no objectivity or integrity.
I don't see anything in Romney's past that qualifies him to be president - neither in his poor record as governor nor his record as a vulture capitalist.
So you justify voting for Obummer based on what?
Several justifications, but most of all because the alternative is too dangerous for America and the world.
Romney is a warmongering chickenhawk who has never served his country in the military.
Romney tells vets dangerous world demands powerful military | Reuters