Romney, Santorum, and Gingrich plans raise deficit. Obama and Paul plans cut deficit.

Like I said, you fudged it to make it look like your guy is going to actually curtail his spending spree. Then, when you are called on it, you act like a typical RED in a brown shirt and personal attack instead of showing where I'm wrong.

I'm soooo surprised by this from a commie.
 
Didn't lie about shit.

Taxes are mandated in the Constitution. You fucking assholes skip right over that part. Along with the general welfare and regulate commerce clauses.

Do you know the purpose of federal taxation?

Pay the debts of the nation.

Which is funny..since you guys put into power a President that cut taxes during wartime.

Good show. :clap2:

Wrong. Federal taxation exists to regulate consumer demand and target low rates of inflation. That is simple fact. If you have trouble accepting this, look at a dollar bill and ask yourself what it is.

The most unattractive aspect of Obama is his base who blindly supports him while largely having little understanding of reality. If you are going to argue the case for Obama, at least do him some credit and argue it effectively.
 
Last edited:
Problem with studies like these is you really don't know how they got the numbers. Why don't people link to their source documents and explain how they arrive at these mysterious numbers?

Mike
 
Ron Paul is a pathetic joke, however, I do believe he understands that the size and authoritative scope of government needs to be trimmed down. Is his plan feasible, only under a dictatorship.
 
This shouldn't surprise anyone.

Santorum, Gingrich, and Romney are running on the failed fantasies of Reaganomics,

the absurd promise to balance the budget with a policy that defies every known rule of simple mathematics.
 
Ron Paul is a pathetic joke, however, I do believe he understands that the size and authoritative scope of government needs to be trimmed down. Is his plan feasible, only under a dictatorship.

He's a pathetic joke, but only he understands the size and strength needs to be trimmed down, is that your view?




So if he's a pathetic joke, what are Santorum/Romney/Gingrich/Obama? Super dee duper uber pathetic jokes since they all think the size and strength of the federal gov't needs increased?
 
Ron Paul is a pathetic joke, however, I do believe he understands that the size and authoritative scope of government needs to be trimmed down. Is his plan feasible, only under a dictatorship.

That pathetic joke is going to reign hellfire on the GOP convention. His supporters will not be moved to vote for the GOP candidate unless there are some serious concessions handed to Paul on his wishes.

Which means, if you're a Obama supporter, jump for glee and get ready to spend spend spend until we bust it. If you're a republican looking for your party to take the executive branch, you might want to start the process of being more polite to Paul and his supporters.

Just sayin'.
 
Problem with studies like these is you really don't know how they got the numbers. Why don't people link to their source documents and explain how they arrive at these mysterious numbers?

Mike

Primary Numbers: The GOP Candidates and the National Debt | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Anyone following that link and actually reading that report can see that Dr. Paul is the only Republican candidate that will LOWER our debt and deficits.

Now where is their comparable report on Barry's budget?
 
Do you know the purpose of federal taxation?

Pay the debts of the nation.

Which is funny..since you guys put into power a President that cut taxes during wartime.

Good show. :clap2:

Wrong. Federal taxation exists to regulate consumer demand and target low rates of inflation. That is simple fact. If you have trouble accepting this, look at a dollar bill and ask yourself what it is.

The most unattractive aspect of Obama is his base who blindly supports him while largely having little understanding of reality. If you are going to argue the case for Obama, at least do him some credit and argue it effectively.

Cool deal. You point out in the constitution where it says this..
 
Problem with studies like these is you really don't know how they got the numbers. Why don't people link to their source documents and explain how they arrive at these mysterious numbers?

Mike

Primary Numbers: The GOP Candidates and the National Debt | Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget

Anyone following that link and actually reading that report can see that Dr. Paul is the only Republican candidate that will LOWER our debt and deficits.

Now where is their comparable report on Barry's budget?

Oh gosh..Paul lards bills with earmarks as well.

He talks a good game sometimes..but then he veers off into fantasy land.

You guys who love him so much don't listen to everything he says.

Just recently in debates..he said that birth control pills were the result of immorality.

Really?

Seriously?

And this cat is a "liberatarian"?
 

Anyone following that link and actually reading that report can see that Dr. Paul is the only Republican candidate that will LOWER our debt and deficits.

Now where is their comparable report on Barry's budget?

Oh gosh..Paul lards bills with earmarks as well.

He talks a good game sometimes..but then he veers off into fantasy land.

You guys who love him so much don't listen to everything he says.

Just recently in debates..he said that birth control pills were the result of immorality.

Really?

Seriously?

And this cat is a "liberatarian"?

I disagree with him 100% on birth control.

Now please show me a plan of his that calls for a gov't ban of any kind on birth control. Otherwise, his view on it personally is meaningless.
 
Maybe Obama should go with Ron Paul this time... :lol:

Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits
February 24, 2012 RSS Feed Print



By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Huge tax cuts in the budget plans of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum would produce the kinds of trillion-dollar-plus deficits that the GOP candidates are blaming on President Barack Obama.

That's the finding by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington-based budget watchdog group.

The study also says the more modest tax and spending plans of Mitt Romney wouldn't make a dent in deficits that are on track to average $800 billion or so a year over the coming decade under current trends and policies — and could add to them considerably.

Only Ron Paul, who calls for wrenching budget cuts that dwarf anything proposed by his three rivals, would reduce the flow of red ink. But even Paul's plan would leave in place a deficit in the $500 billion range by the end of his first term.

The candidates' budget plans provide a sharp contrast with those of President Barack Obama, who released his latest fiscal blueprint just last week. Like Obama, the GOP candidates have the luxury of suspending political reality and assuming lawmakers would quickly enact their ideas into law.
Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits - US News and World Report

obama plans to cut the deficit? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Anyone following that link and actually reading that report can see that Dr. Paul is the only Republican candidate that will LOWER our debt and deficits.

Now where is their comparable report on Barry's budget?

Oh gosh..Paul lards bills with earmarks as well.

He talks a good game sometimes..but then he veers off into fantasy land.

You guys who love him so much don't listen to everything he says.

Just recently in debates..he said that birth control pills were the result of immorality.

Really?

Seriously?

And this cat is a "liberatarian"?

I disagree with him 100% on birth control.

Now please show me a plan of his that calls for a gov't ban of any kind on birth control. Otherwise, his view on it personally is meaningless.

No it's not.

And none of the GOP candidates (That I know of anyway) are calling for a "ban". They are calling for allowing religious business to not cover contraception. By the way, there are certain ailments that are treated with birth control pills..this issue is not trivial.

And Dr. Paul also "feels" that businesses should be allowed to serve who they want. That, by the way, was the reason the civil rights movement began in the first place.
 
Maybe Obama should go with Ron Paul this time... :lol:

Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits
February 24, 2012 RSS Feed Print



By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Huge tax cuts in the budget plans of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum would produce the kinds of trillion-dollar-plus deficits that the GOP candidates are blaming on President Barack Obama.

That's the finding by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington-based budget watchdog group.

The study also says the more modest tax and spending plans of Mitt Romney wouldn't make a dent in deficits that are on track to average $800 billion or so a year over the coming decade under current trends and policies — and could add to them considerably.

Only Ron Paul, who calls for wrenching budget cuts that dwarf anything proposed by his three rivals, would reduce the flow of red ink. But even Paul's plan would leave in place a deficit in the $500 billion range by the end of his first term.

The candidates' budget plans provide a sharp contrast with those of President Barack Obama, who released his latest fiscal blueprint just last week. Like Obama, the GOP candidates have the luxury of suspending political reality and assuming lawmakers would quickly enact their ideas into law.
Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits - US News and World Report

obama plans to cut the deficit? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Yep.

And not by cutting taxes..either. :lol:
 
Oh gosh..Paul lards bills with earmarks as well.

He talks a good game sometimes..but then he veers off into fantasy land.

You guys who love him so much don't listen to everything he says.

Just recently in debates..he said that birth control pills were the result of immorality.

Really?

Seriously?

And this cat is a "liberatarian"?

I disagree with him 100% on birth control.

Now please show me a plan of his that calls for a gov't ban of any kind on birth control. Otherwise, his view on it personally is meaningless.

No it's not.

And none of the GOP candidates (That I know of anyway) are calling for a "ban". They are calling for allowing religious business to not cover contraception. By the way, there are certain ailments that are treated with birth control pills..this issue is not trivial.

And Dr. Paul also "feels" that businesses should be allowed to serve who they want. That, by the way, was the reason the civil rights movement began in the first place.

Correct, he's a capitalist.
 
Maybe Obama should go with Ron Paul this time... :lol:

Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits
February 24, 2012 RSS Feed Print



By ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Huge tax cuts in the budget plans of Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum would produce the kinds of trillion-dollar-plus deficits that the GOP candidates are blaming on President Barack Obama.

That's the finding by the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a Washington-based budget watchdog group.

The study also says the more modest tax and spending plans of Mitt Romney wouldn't make a dent in deficits that are on track to average $800 billion or so a year over the coming decade under current trends and policies — and could add to them considerably.

Only Ron Paul, who calls for wrenching budget cuts that dwarf anything proposed by his three rivals, would reduce the flow of red ink. But even Paul's plan would leave in place a deficit in the $500 billion range by the end of his first term.

The candidates' budget plans provide a sharp contrast with those of President Barack Obama, who released his latest fiscal blueprint just last week. Like Obama, the GOP candidates have the luxury of suspending political reality and assuming lawmakers would quickly enact their ideas into law.
Study: Candidates' plans lead to huge deficits - US News and World Report

obama plans to cut the deficit? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

His plan (which he'll probably back away from like he does most everything else) plans to cut the deficit by increasing taxes enough to cover his even further increase of spending.

More taxes and more spending, a great way to remedy a garbage economy.....................:cuckoo:
 
I disagree with him 100% on birth control.

Now please show me a plan of his that calls for a gov't ban of any kind on birth control. Otherwise, his view on it personally is meaningless.

No it's not.

And none of the GOP candidates (That I know of anyway) are calling for a "ban". They are calling for allowing religious business to not cover contraception. By the way, there are certain ailments that are treated with birth control pills..this issue is not trivial.

And Dr. Paul also "feels" that businesses should be allowed to serve who they want. That, by the way, was the reason the civil rights movement began in the first place.

Correct, he's a capitalist.

Oh nonsense.

Tax payer funding fosters businesses. Without infrastructure, security and judicial elements, these "capitalistic" ventures would not exist. Telling a tax payer he cannot patronize something he pays for..is bullshit.
 
Maybe Obama should go with Ron Paul this time... :lol:

obama plans to cut the deficit? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

His plan (which he'll probably back away from like he does most everything else) plans to cut the deficit by increasing taxes enough to cover his even further increase of spending.

More taxes and more spending, a great way to remedy a garbage economy.....................:cuckoo:

His plan is to let the Bush tax cuts expire...as they should. As well as cutting loopholes and changes some of the tax code to be more friendly to domestic enterprises.

There's actually a tax cut..for some businesses.
 

Forum List

Back
Top