Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!

[Dagosa]

Who got you!

So you admit you’re a dipshit.

 

[daveman]

No it not worthless. Never has been. Even under RvW Abortions after the first trimester were rare and only if it threatened the health of the mother, rape and incest.

Why the artificial division at the first trimester? Is it because 95% of those abortions are done for convenience?

 

[daveman]

You’re on the wrong side. Only fascist nations took away choice.

Yes, because valuing all human life is definitely a fascist trait.

You're a dumbass.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Okay. It just boils down to believing the unborn are worthless.

I do not believe the unborn are worthless..

The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when they right is granted by the potential birth mother..

 

[daveman]

Uh huh. How do you feel about vaccine mandates?

You deliberately ducked this question, NotfooledbyW.

Why is that?

 

[daveman]

I do not believe the unborn are worthless..

The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when they right is granted by the potential birth mother..

Odd...it was my understanding the right to life is granted by God.

So you're saying everyone has an equal right to life unless someone wants them dead.

You need to carefully think about what you believe.

 

[jc456]

Your stupid little questions are just stupid….

And you can’t answer cause it shows me right

 

[jc456]

So you admit you’re a dipshit.

Who got you

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Odd...it was my understanding the right to life is granted by God.

it is. The unborn have a right to life when granted by the potential birth mother.

It’s not complicated at when you accept women are sovereigns over their own body.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

So you're saying everyone has an equal right to life unless someone wants them dead.

NotfooledbyW xii,cml to 946: . no, I did not say that. You are a liar.

NotfooledbyW xii.cmxlix to 944: The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when that right is granted by the potential birthmother. nfbw 241116 Vrvwgo12949

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

 

[daveman]

it is. The unborn have a right to life when granted by the potential birth mother.

No. I said God, not the mother.

It’s not complicated at when you accept women are sovereigns over their own body.

Do you support vaccine mandates?

 

[daveman]

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

NotfooledbyW xii,cml to 946: . no, I did not say that. You are a liar.

NotfooledbyW xii.cmxlix to 944: The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when that right is granted by the potential birthmother. nfbw 241116 Vrvwgo12949

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

Okay. Then you're saying everyone has an equal right to life except when the birth mother wants them dead.

And stop with the fucked-up formatting.

 

[jc456]

it is. The unborn have a right to life when granted by the potential birth mother.

It’s not complicated at when you accept women are sovereigns over their own body.

Playing god? No authority

 

[jc456]

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

NotfooledbyW xii,cml to 946: . no, I did not say that. You are a liar.

Dumbfk you just posted it again

NotfooledbyW xii.cmxlix to 944: The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when that right is granted by the potential birthmother. nfbw 241116 Vrvwgo12949

Then you said unless the mother decided differently

nfbw 241226 Vrvwgo12950

 

[whutTHEYsay]

nfbw 241116 Vrfdwgo12955

i. NotfooledbyW xii.cmxlix to 935: The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when that right is granted by the potential birthmother. nfbw 241116 Vrvwgo12944

ii. daveman xii,cmxlvi to 944: So you're saying everyone has an equal right to life unless someone wants them dead. dvmn 241116 Srvwgo12946

iii. jc456 xii.cmdiv to 12950: Then you said unless the mother decided differently jcNyz 241116 Srvwgo12954

iv. NotfooledbyW xii,cmlv 12954: Yes. I said “mother” in paragraph i. but to be precise I said “potential birthmother”

In paragraph ii. Saint Daveman changed my “potential mother” to “someone”z

My argumeant is based on the absolute sovereignty of the individual to have the right to privacy and autonomy over what happens to an individual’s god-given body.

The “potential birthmother” is the only individual to have sovereignty over the potential human being inside her body.

Whrn Saint Daveman altered my argument to random someone’s instead of “potential birthmother” he lied.

That’s out of the way.

Can you explain why you want the government to deny sovereignty over their own body to women when they become pregnant?

nfbw 241116 Vrfdwgo12955

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Okay. Then you're saying everyone has an equal right to life except when the birth mother wants them dead.

Yes. The state has no interest in protecting the developing fetus from being denied life by its potential mother.

daveman xxvii : It really is simple: If you don't want to have a child, or father a child, don't have sex. If you do, be prepared to handle the consequences. dvmn 110630 Ssabio00028

If the people have sex and are not prepared for the consequences and an abortion is the result in a red state like Ohio where it is their constitutional right, what harm must the government protect all the self controlled good Christian Republicans from being inflicted upon them?

What is thirteen years of your Republican Christian anti-abortion zealotry accomplishing besides ending western liberal democracy for strong one pussygrabber rule?

 

[Redfish]

I already did. It’s not murder when a woman terminates your own pregnancy.

So you are lying when you say that a woman terminating her own pregnancy is murder.

I knew you were a liar too.

Just wanted to confirm it thank you

so the unborn human was alive before the abortion and now he or she is dead----------------and the abortion did not kill him or her? your 'logic' is flawed.

 

[Redfish]

nfbw 241116 Vrfdwgo12955

i. NotfooledbyW xii.cmxlix to 935: The unborn have equal right to life and should be protected by society from harm and abuse when that right is granted by the potential birthmother. nfbw 241116 Vrvwgo12944

ii. daveman xii,cmxlvi to 944: So you're saying everyone has an equal right to life unless someone wants them dead. dvmn 241116 Srvwgo12946

iii. jc456 xii.cmdiv to 12950: Then you said unless the mother decided differently jcNyz 241116 Srvwgo12954

iv. NotfooledbyW xii,cmlv 12954: Yes. I said “mother” in paragraph i. but to be precise I said “potential birthmother”

In paragraph ii. Saint Daveman changed my “potential mother” to “someone”z

My argumeant is based on the absolute sovereignty of the individual to have the right to privacy and autonomy over what happens to an individual’s god-given body.

The “potential birthmother” is the only individual to have sovereignty over the potential human being inside her body.

Whrn Saint Daveman altered my argument to random someone’s instead of “potential birthmother” he lied.

That’s out of the way.

Can you explain why you want the government to deny sovereignty over their own body to women when they become pregnant?

nfbw 241116 Vrfdwgo12955

The basic question here is whether an unborn child is or is not a human being. There will probably always be disagreement on that point. So the supreme court turned the question over to the voters of each state to decide. The SC got it right.

 

[Redfish]

Why the artificial division at the first trimester? Is it because 95% of those abortions are done for convenience?

all abortions are done for convenience (except for a very tiny % that are medically necessary) Using the logic of the left why not allow "abortion" up to 2 years old if the kid becomes inconvenient or burdensome?

 

[Redfish]

No exceptions to save the life of the mother or prevent severe injury to the mother ? Rape, incest etc. ?
Answer !

of course, everyone agrees with those exceptions.