" Existentialism Of Relinquishing Control To More Adequate Lexicon Descriptors "
* Lunar Ticks Group Think Confounded By Self Incrimination *
Just sticking with the traditional standard's, it's you all that have attempted to turn everything inside out and upside down.
Is there another way of explaining paradox ?
Would it be a condition of equal protection with a citizen that populism should decree whether a death penalty of capital punishment can or can not be an option of criminal justice ?
A protection directly implies a retort , and a double meaning from equitable doctrine is that an act of illegitimate aggression by a perpetrator , which removes a wright to life of another individual , necessarily incurs reciprocity from equitable doctrine whereby the perpetrator is to have removed its own right to life , albeit by due process .
Perhaps you would agree with an opinion that populism should decree whether death as capital punishment may or may not be allowed to occur by law at a federal level , or at state level ; however , this moniker would disagree and assert that such a decree to prohibit death as capital punishment is prohibited by us constitution at a state level , or at a federal level in defense of individualism and its foundation of us republic from its e pluribus unum credo .
Would a decree that a death penalty as capital punishment not be allowed in statutes of law be a decree consistent with christian ethos , and were it remanded for meritocracy would it not violate equitable doctrine and therefore principles of non violence and individualism ?
Would a decree that a death penalty as capital punishment not be allowed in statutes of law be a decree consistent with equal protection of negative liberties among individuals entitled by a live birth requirement to receive them , and would that decree also violate a us 1st amendment establishment clause ?
* Religious Establishment Paradox Clause Violators Decide On No Name Perspective Hues *
Would a tenet to forget but not ever to forgive be consistent with a christian ethos ?
Would a tenet to forgive but not ever to forget be consistent with a christian ethos ?
Would a tenet to forget and forgive be consistent with a christian ethos ?
Would a tenet to forgive and forget be consistent with a christian ethos ?
* Selective Designation For Citizenship In Us Republic Credo Of E Pluribus Unum Espousing Independence As Individualism *
There is not a difference between the edicts and tenets of a creed and a religion , and there is not an exception in us 1st amendment for a religion with edicts and tenets of creed for illegitimate aggression as violence against individuals .
A legitimate state interest is not in when biological life exists , or whether a biological life exists at all , rather a legitimate state interest is in whether a wright to life exists ; and , a state interest is prohibited in protecting a wright to life of any entity which has not met a live birth requirement to receive equal protection of negative liberties .
A zygote , or embryo , or fetus has not met a birth requirement to receive equal protection with a citizen that would include a wright to life , and any perceived offense against a fetus is in fact an offense against the mother .
Albeit by due process and contingent upon a double meaning from equitable doctrine , a perpetrator sentenced to death for capital punishment has its wright to life removed , and without an ability to redeem its wright to life a perpetrator would then be subject to the conditions of moral relativism that exist in nature prior to any individual exchanging its natural freedoms for protected wrights through membership in a social civil contract as specified by a constitution .
Fetal protection laws specifically stipulate that a death penalty is not an available punishment for injury or death of a fetus , whether intentional or not intentional , which follows from a birth requirement for equal protection .
