Rock throwing kids face 20 years in jail. Not even Apartheid South Africa tried this.

[montelatici]

So, the consensus among the zero IQ Israel Firsters is that the Palestinians should resign themselves to Jew rule forever, just because Jews are those doing the ruling.

These same hypocrites support the insurgency against the Syrian government and would arm the insurgents against the Syrian government.

A group of morons that proposed that the non-whites resign themselves to white-rule in Rhodesia, South West Africa and South Africa would have been deemed racists. The Israel Firsters are proposing an analogous behavior on the part of the Palestinians and are, by extension, racists. And yes, discrimination and oppression based on ethnicity and religion are considered racism.

 

[Kondor3]

So, the consensus among the zero IQ Israel Firsters is that the Palestinians should resign themselves to Jew rule forever, just because Jews are those doing the ruling.

These same hypocrites support the insurgency against the Syrian government and would arm the insurgents against the Syrian government.

A group of morons that proposed that the non-whites resign themselves to white-rule in Rhodesia, South West Africa and South Africa would have been deemed racists. The Israel Firsters are proposing an analogous behavior on the part of the Palestinians and are, by extension, racists. And yes, discrimination and oppression based on ethnicity and religion are considered racism.

No, the Arab-Muslim Palestinians of (what little is left of) the West Bank, and Gaza, should pack up and leave Jewish Palestine (Eretz Yisrael), and head for Arab Palestine (Jordan).

They've been squatting on Jewish land long enough.

Only the worst under-performers are content to sit on their asses in refugee camp and refugee town shit-holes for 66 years, without improving their lot.

Time for them to stop blaming others, and to get off their asses, and build new and better lives for themselves, someplace else.

They lost - the Losing Side does not dictate terms - and it's time for them to take the losing side's "Sucker's Walk".

Time for them to leave.

 

[Daniyel]

You moron do realize I can't throw rocks on people as much as yyour beloved wolves but you ***** because they don't give a shit about the law, hopefully now they won't have much a choice but to act rationally by default, truly disappointed of you.

 

[montelatici]

So, the consensus among the zero IQ Israel Firsters is that the Palestinians should resign themselves to Jew rule forever, just because Jews are those doing the ruling.

These same hypocrites support the insurgency against the Syrian government and would arm the insurgents against the Syrian government.

A group of morons that proposed that the non-whites resign themselves to white-rule in Rhodesia, South West Africa and South Africa would have been deemed racists. The Israel Firsters are proposing an analogous behavior on the part of the Palestinians and are, by extension, racists. And yes, discrimination and oppression based on ethnicity and religion are considered racism.

No, the Arab-Muslim Palestinians of (what little is left of) the West Bank, and Gaza, should pack up and leave Jewish Palestine (Eretz Yisrael), and head for Arab Palestine (Jordan).

They've been squatting on Jewish land long enough.

Only the worst under-performers are content to sit on their asses in refugee camp and refugee town shit-holes for 66 years, without improving their lot.

Time for them to stop blaming others, and to get off their asses, and build new and better lives for themselves, someplace else.

They lost - the Losing Side does not dictate terms - and it's time for them to take the losing side's "Sucker's Walk".

Time for them to leave.

Still posting propaganda. The Jews are the invaders who took land from the indigenous people. The indigenous people have every right to resist and convince the world to return their land. The Boers won the wars against the non-whites and subjugated them. Who ended up in charge?

 

[Kondor3]

So, the consensus among the zero IQ Israel Firsters is that the Palestinians should resign themselves to Jew rule forever, just because Jews are those doing the ruling.

These same hypocrites support the insurgency against the Syrian government and would arm the insurgents against the Syrian government.

A group of morons that proposed that the non-whites resign themselves to white-rule in Rhodesia, South West Africa and South Africa would have been deemed racists. The Israel Firsters are proposing an analogous behavior on the part of the Palestinians and are, by extension, racists. And yes, discrimination and oppression based on ethnicity and religion are considered racism.

No, the Arab-Muslim Palestinians of (what little is left of) the West Bank, and Gaza, should pack up and leave Jewish Palestine (Eretz Yisrael), and head for Arab Palestine (Jordan).

They've been squatting on Jewish land long enough.

Only the worst under-performers are content to sit on their asses in refugee camp and refugee town shit-holes for 66 years, without improving their lot.

Time for them to stop blaming others, and to get off their asses, and build new and better lives for themselves, someplace else.

They lost - the Losing Side does not dictate terms - and it's time for them to take the losing side's "Sucker's Walk".

Time for them to leave.

Still posting propaganda. The Jews are the invaders who took land from the indigenous people. The indigenous people have every right to resist and convince the world to return their land. The Boers won the wars against the non-whites and subjugated them. Who ended up in charge?

Ya'll can sit in a circle-jerk and fantasize about comparisons with South Africa during its Apartheid years, until you go blue in the face.

Doesn't make it operative, nor does it win back one single thumbnail-sized nugget of land for the losing-side Palestinians.

Muslims kicked Jews out of their countries by the scores and hundreds of thousands in the 1948-1975 timeframe.

Consider the squeezing-out of Palestinians to be a matter of returning the favor.

It's over... it's been over for decades... time to wake up and smell the coffee... time to take a hike... or rot or die in-place... ether one is fine.

 

[montelatici]

Eventually, the non-Jews will win. It's a matter of demographics, nothing more. The Jews should make a deal when they have the upper hand. There are no more millions of Russian Jews available to help the Jew demographics. Don't you get it? The American Jews aren't going to leave America, trust me.

 

[P F Tinmore]

P F Tinmore, et al,

OK, this is merely a pro-Palestinian stance, for which they refuse to take through the agreed upon dispute process.

P F Tinmore, et al,

Either the Palestinian State is Occupied, as in the "territory occupied since 1967;" or it is not.

You keep bringing that up without the background of the responsibilities of an occupying power and how Israel does not fit in that category.

(COMMENT)

So, if Israel is not the "Occupying Power," then the State of Palestine is not occupied by Israel and there is no complaint on that score.

You cannot claim that Israel is not the Occupying Power on one hand --- and then --- on the other hand, claim to be part of the Resistance to Israeli Occupation. Either Israel is the Occupation Power --- or it is not an Occupation Power. You cannot have it both ways.

Please understand the ramifications of your answer.

Most Respectfully,
R

You have to look at the different phases of aggression.

Invading power. Yes.

Colonial power. Yes.

Occupying power. A little sometimes.

(COMMENT)

Acts of Aggression are defined by A/RES/3314(XXIX) 14 December 1974 --- Definition of Aggression. It is important to note that the codification comes seven (7) years after the Six-Day War [ex post facto application ("after the facts")]. It is also just as important to remember that the codification came during the periods in which the West Bank was Israeli Occupied Jordanian Territory and the Israeli Occupation of the Egyptian Military Governorship of Gaza.

• Question of: Invading power.
  • Israel did not invade and occupy Palestinian Territory in 1967. The Arab Palestinian has no real cause of action against the Israeli relative to the establishment of the occupation.
    • West Bank was Jordanian Territory
    • Gaza Strip was an Egyptian Military Governorship
• Question of: Colonial power.
  • In 1979 the permanent boundary between Egypt and Israel is the recognized international boundary between Egypt and the former mandated territory of Palestine, as shown on the map at Annex II, without prejudice to the issue of the status of the Gaza Strip. The Parties recognize this boundary as inviolable. Each will respect the territorial integrity of the other, including their territorial waters and airspace. (Treaty of Peace between the Arab Republic of Egypt and the State of Israel)
  • In 1994, the international boundary between Israel and Jordan is delimited with reference to the boundary definition under the Mandate as is shown in Annex I(a), on the mapping materials attached thereto and co-ordinates specified therein. The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognised international boundary between Israel and Jordan, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967. (The Treaty of Peace between the Government of the State of Israel and the Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan)
    
  • Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (sole representatives of the Palestinian People) negotiated certain arrangements pertaining to Area "C" [includes all Israeli settlements (cities, towns, and villages)] in the Oslo Accords [Oslo I (1993); Oslo II (1995)].
    • In order to guarantee public order and internal security for the Palestinians of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, the Council shall establish a strong police force as set out in Article XIV below. Israel shall continue to carry the responsibility for defense against external threats, including the responsibility for protecting the Egyptian and Jordanian borders, and for defense against external threats from the sea and from the air, as well as the responsibility for overall security of Israelis and Settlements, for the purpose of safeguarding their internal security and public order, and will have all the powers to take the steps necessary to meet this responsibility.
• Question of: Occupying power.
  • Occupation may be defined as the effective control of a foreign territory by hostile armed forces. This definition derives from Article 42 of the Hague Regulations of 1907, which states that “Territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army. The occupation extends only to the territory where such authority has been established and can be exercised.”
    • The Gaza Strip occupation ended in 2005.
    • Area "C" of the West Bank is "Occupied" under the permanent status of negotiations pursuant to the Oslo Accords.
    • Areas "A" and "B" area questionable, as current law does not delineate such circumstances. An argument can be made that Israel has some measure of effective control in Area "B."

There is an argument to be made as to whether or not the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) represents a true hostile armed forces. The argument is based on the fact that Israeli Occupation is NOT founded on the subjugation of the Palestinian people, or exerting domination and exploitation that constitutes a denial of fundamental human rights, is contrary to the Charter of the United Nations and is an impediment to the promotion of world peace and co-operation. On the contrary, the IDF and Israeli Occupation is based on the suppression of Hostile Arab Palestinians the have declared Jihad against Israeli sovereignty; threatening the peace through the use of force and harboring terrorist and insurgents that target Israeli citizens.

Most Respectfully,
R

Load of crap. Rocco.

The Palestinians are defending their country.

 

[Kondor3]

Eventually, the non-Jews will win. It's a matter of demographics, nothing more. The Jews should make a deal when they have the upper hand. There are no more millions of Russian Jews available to help the Jew demographics. Don't you get it? The American Jews aren't going to leave America, trust me.

You continue to disregard the obvious solution...

Expulsion of the Muslim-Arabs from what little is left of Rump Palestine...

Yes, I know, you think that Pakistan will nuke Israel, if they do that...

I don't believe that any such thing will happen...

You see Expulsion as an impossibility...

I see Expulsion as an inevitability, and closer to materializing than you realize...

And the Devil take the hindmost...

Cutting the Gordian Knot...

No guts, no glory...

And, if there's one thing that the Israelis have in abundance, vis a vis their antagonists, it's guts...

There is no Arab Cavalry coming over the hill next time, to rescue the Palestinians...

Hell, even their co-religionists and fellow Arabs have given up on the Palestinians...

It's gotten to the point where even the Egyptians and the Jordanians help the Israelis to wall-off the Mad Dog Palestinians...

Nobody is going to go to war over them, once they're expelled...

And it won't take more than a few weeks to mop-up their sorry asses and to push them over the borders, if the Israelis ever decide that such a course of action is best...

There is no way that the Israelis will ever allow the Arabs to overrun them...

Militarily, or by demographics...

No way...

Guaranteed.

 

[montelatici]

Where would the non-Jews be expelled to? Do you really think that the world, the U.S. included would allow that level of ethnic cleansing? The Serbs tried that, see where it got them.

 

[Kondor3]

Where would the non-Jews be expelled to?...

Jordan, Egypt and Lebanon would all need to be paid-off, to let-in a percentage of them.

Hell, perhaps the Egyptians can be persuaded to part with a piece of the Sinai, to relocate them to.

All kinds of possibilities, nearby, and a layer or two beyond immediate next-door neighbors.

That's all detail, and easily sorted, given enough money.

...Do you really think that the world, the U.S. included would allow that level of ethnic cleansing?...

Yes, if it separates the two warring parties, permanently, and ends this thing the only way possible, at this late juncture.

Given their history and complete incompatibility, there is no longer any other choice.

It's going to come down to Relocation or Extermination.

Relocation is far more humane.

...The Serbs tried that, see where it got them.

That was before 9-11 and the London Tube bombings, and before Afghanistan, and before Iraq, and before ISIS and its Caliphate.

If that happened today, The West would not lift a finger.

Actually, come to think of it, that's not quite right...

The West would probably serve-up a condemnatory UN Resolution, just to go through the motions and put on a good show and pay lip service to the issue.

And THEN The West would sit back, and not lift a finger.

Believe it.

 

[montelatici]

Just like the West did for Serbia for Kosovo and for the South Africans and Rhodesians?

 

[HenryBHough]

C'mon..... REAL terrorists don't throw rocks. They throw themselves off highway overpasses into the windshields of oncoming traffic. But only once.

 

[Kondor3]

Just like the West did for Serbia for Kosovo and for the South Africans and Rhodesians?

9-11 and the London Tube Bombings (and Iraq and Afghanistan) will trigger a different yield in the case of Israel.

 

[Politico]

Meh. I'd have sentenced them to DEATH, on the spot, sans trial; so they're getting off pretty easy as I see it.

Typical of child killers.

Child killers? Let me tell you something my father taught me. Don't stand on the delivery end of a weapon unless you are willing to face the other.

 

[docmauser1]

Ministers okay bill jailing stone throwers for 20 years

Israel is humane, indeed, in other places rock-hurlers get shot. Dooh.

 

[montelatici]

Just like the West did for Serbia for Kosovo and for the South Africans and Rhodesians?

9-11 and the London Tube Bombings (and Iraq and Afghanistan) will trigger a different yield in the case of Israel.

Not at all, it will be the same result in the end. Only the U.S. supports Israel now, and that will change in time.

 

[montelatici]

Meh. I'd have sentenced them to DEATH, on the spot, sans trial; so they're getting off pretty easy as I see it.

Typical of child killers.

Child killers? Let me tell you something my father taught me. Don't stand on the delivery end of a weapon unless you are willing to face the other.

Are the Israelis throwing rocks back at the children?

 

[montelatici]

Israelis are child killers, fact.

 

[Kondor3]

Just like the West did for Serbia for Kosovo and for the South Africans and Rhodesians?

9-11 and the London Tube Bombings (and Iraq and Afghanistan) will trigger a different yield in the case of Israel.

Not at all, it will be the same result in the end. Only the U.S. supports Israel now, and that will change in time.

Not at all?

I respectfully submit that you are not in touch with Middle America.

Push comes to shove, most of Europe supports Israel, as well - certainly in any showdown between regional Islam and Israel, during a state of war.

But America is enough.

And that isn't changing anytime soon.

If-and-when that ever does, by that time, the Israelis will have long-since completed their Reconquista, and strong US support will have become secondary, at best.

 

[Politico]

Meh. I'd have sentenced them to DEATH, on the spot, sans trial; so they're getting off pretty easy as I see it.

Typical of child killers.

Child killers? Let me tell you something my father taught me. Don't stand on the delivery end of a weapon unless you are willing to face the other.

Are the Israelis throwing rocks back at the children?

Don't know. Doesn't make the point untrue.