Pastelli
Platinum Member
- Nov 6, 2023
- 5,330
- 3,453
- 938
Let's put it this way:
The fact that some civilians unfortunately, also died in Iran (civilians it sees as friends) during Roaring Lion shows Israel never seeks to harm civilians as a routine, rule (and Gaza is no exception).
Roaring Lion Shows Israel’s Moral Compass in War. Gaza and Iran Alike—Israel’s War Is With Terror, Not Civilians. Israel’s Precision Strikes Prove It Never Targets Civilians.
Israel’s conduct during Operation Roaring Lion underscores a consistent principle: it does not target civilians as a matter of policy. Even in Iran—where Israel has no obligation to minimize harm toward a hostile regime—civilian casualties were unintended and limited. This is significant because it demonstrates that Israel’s military doctrine prioritizes precision and restraint even when facing adversaries.
If Israel were indifferent to civilian life, operations in Iran would likely look very different. Instead, the outcome reflects deliberate targeting of strategic threats, not populations. That same principle applies in Gaza. Civilian casualties there, while tragic, occur in the context of Hamas embedding military infrastructure within densely populated areas—not because Israel seeks harm to civilians.
In short, Israel’s actions in Iran reinforce a broader pattern: civilian harm is not the objective, but a byproduct of confronting groups and regimes that operate from within civilian environments.
(Link) | 3.28.26
The fact that some civilians unfortunately, also died in Iran (civilians it sees as friends) during Roaring Lion shows Israel never seeks to harm civilians as a routine, rule (and Gaza is no exception).
Roaring Lion Shows Israel’s Moral Compass in War. Gaza and Iran Alike—Israel’s War Is With Terror, Not Civilians. Israel’s Precision Strikes Prove It Never Targets Civilians.
Israel’s conduct during Operation Roaring Lion underscores a consistent principle: it does not target civilians as a matter of policy. Even in Iran—where Israel has no obligation to minimize harm toward a hostile regime—civilian casualties were unintended and limited. This is significant because it demonstrates that Israel’s military doctrine prioritizes precision and restraint even when facing adversaries.
If Israel were indifferent to civilian life, operations in Iran would likely look very different. Instead, the outcome reflects deliberate targeting of strategic threats, not populations. That same principle applies in Gaza. Civilian casualties there, while tragic, occur in the context of Hamas embedding military infrastructure within densely populated areas—not because Israel seeks harm to civilians.
In short, Israel’s actions in Iran reinforce a broader pattern: civilian harm is not the objective, but a byproduct of confronting groups and regimes that operate from within civilian environments.
(Link) | 3.28.26
