Rittenhouse says he supports blm

Wouldn't it be a hoot if he told the gun nutters that he does not want to be their poster child?
 
Vigilante fantasies.. for young men on both sides without futures or education.

Just like the vigilante fantasies of a man named George, a man named Thomas, a man named John, a man named Alexander, a man named James and a man named Benjamin. Good thing you weren't around to scold the Founding Fathers about their foolish flights of fancy from up there on your high horse.
 
Just like the vigilante fantasies of a man named George, a man named Thomas, a man named John, a man named Alexander, a man named James and a man named Benjamin. Good thing you weren't around to scold the Founding Fathers from up there on your high horse.

Are you comparing these unemployed losers and mental midgets with the Founding Fathers?
 
no it isnt. you are right.but the blm is threatening him so he will say something nice on them.

Joshua Ziminski: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know | Heavy.com
Nov 15, 2021 · Joshua Ziminski is the man who has come up the most in the Kyle Rittenhouse trial who has never been called to the witness stand.. Neither the …

The man who admitted firing gunshots before Kyle Rittenhouse gunned down two people and wounded a third during a protest in Kenosha, Wis., has been charged.

Joshua Ziminski, 35, faces disorderly conduct and use of a dangerous weapon charges stemming from the Aug. 25 shooting during protests in the city over Jacob Blake's serious injuries after being shot in the back by police.

According to a criminal complaint obtained by Fox News, Kenosha detectives investigating the fatal shootings reviewed video footage of the night's events and observed Ziminski holding a black handgun. In one video, he is seen walking with his wife near the Ultimate Gas Station before he is captured firing a shot into the air, authorities said.

KYLE RITTENHOUSE TO SUE BIDEN, CAMPAIGN FOR LIBEL, ATTORNEY SAYS

“Detective Howard observed a muzzle flash emit from the handgun, and heard a gunshot at the same time," the complaint states. "In another video, the defendant is clearly seen at that same location. The defendant is seen walking in the same area, holding his right arm upwards, and firing off one shot from his handgun."
 
Then why did he leave his home town, cross a state line, and illegally acquire a weapon just to shoot them?


You seem confused. Did you not pay attention to the trial? He was not carrying a concealed weapon. Its legal there to carry a long rifle, and therefore.... there was no gun charge.
I understand though they keep repeating these things on MSNBC. Next, he went to the town because that was also his home. It was where his dad lives and though ill advised, he probably felt compelled to defend his community. If he went out there to start shooting BLM members then why did he not shoot at one black person??? because its BS thats why. Biden called him a WHite supremacist before any evidence was in... that tells me this was all political.

He simply took a gun along to protect himself while trying to stop vandalism, put out fires and apply first aid. Its the simplistic thinking of a 17 year old, thats why it doesnt make any sense to you. If there was any evidence of him being a white supremacist, I sure havnt seen any, the only thing the Left can come up with is ... he was there and he had a gun, and that makes him so. The people he shot were people who attacked him and you dont need to take my word for it, there is a jury of 12 people who live IN the town and experienced what went down that day. They dont need outside instigators like Joe Biden or AOC to interfere in the rule of law.
 

Forum List

Back
Top