Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

[DrLove]

Not as stupid as the 3 criminals, eh?

I see two. Was there another Boogaloo Boi in attendance?

 

[DrLove]

Where is the prosecutor, two feet to the judge's right? LOL!

No loon. That is Baby Kyle’s attorney

 

[tahuyaman]

Everyone saw the drawn guns.
She chose to crawl through the window anyway.
Dumb

Like I said. She did a very dumb thing, but it didn’t justify killing her. She wasn’t posing a deadly threat.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I see two. Was there another Boogaloo Boi in attendance?

View attachment 565552

The two dead criminals and "Lefty".

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No loon. That is Baby Kyle’s attorney

And who is on the other side of the judge?

 

[tahuyaman]

Oh, antifa is definitely anti-white racist assholes.

They are anti-law and order. They are opposed to any authority. They are anti capitalists, but I don’t see a particular racial element with them

 

[tahuyaman]

Judge hung out today with Kyle and his defense team. Totally appropriate right?

Without the context of this one can really comment with any confidence.

 

[Turtlesoup]

I have a couple of problems with Rittenhouse's case:

First, if it was legal for him to own that gun, why didn't he purchase it himself?

He admitted to shooting an unarmed man.

He gave away his body armor, claiming he wouldn't need it, because he would be performing first aid.

He retained his weapon instead of giving it to someone who could've used it while he was performing first aid.

He provided first aid to no one.

He may well walk. But if he's found guilty of any of the primary or lesser charges, I can certainly see a strong argument for that.

Usually, when a verdict comes back quickly, it's because guilt or innocence is obvious. If a verdict doesn't come relatively short order, I think that could bode poorly for the the young Mr. Rittenhouse...

You are clueless---actually he did provide minor first aid to several people that night--band aid type stuff.

Gun was legally his. Adults buy guns all the time, and give the guns to their children as gifts.

 

[eagle1462010]

Burning and destroying property is the correct thing to do if the political message needs to be strong enough, such as over a murder by police.
And those who would try to prevent destruction over a valid political protest then would be criminal.

Again, only a criminal would have tried to stop the Boston Tea Party.

And in almost every case the person they are rioting over is the guilty one.

Since your side feels this way. Then the same goes to you. This is why you are so upset. You feel you have the RIGHT TO BURN LOOT AND MURDER. We feel you ARE THE PROBLEM.

That is why this country is divided. Your party is the AMERICA SUCKS PARTY. Burn the flag party. WE ARE AGAINST YOU ON THIS.

The covid nonsense. Me and you happen to be on the same side.

 

[Flash]

Judge hung out today with Kyle and his defense team. Totally appropriate right?

Yea, right. They were playing video games together.

You are a ******* moron.

 

[Flash]

Kyle played stupid games and won stupid prizes.
Shoulda stayed home with his moonfaced Mama, ate hot pockets & played violent video games.

The shitheads that earned stupid prizes were the two assholes that attacked him and got killed and the dipshit that threatened Kyle with a Glock and is now having to masturbate with boyfriend with his left hand.

 

[22lcidw]

I see two. Was there another Boogaloo Boi in attendance?

View attachment 565552

What the ph uk do you care? This kid would protect you before any of the ones who died and injured would.

 

[Indeependent]

I know exactly why Trump got elected. It was a combination of things.

You still can’t support the idiotic accusation that I’m a neo con.

You live behind a gate and have no regard for the welfare of others.

 

[JohnDB]

Yes....as we saw with limits on public gatherings during the height of the covid scandal


Well..one can always vote by mail. LOL.

Not if your constitutional rights are allowed to be circumvented. Which is why we still had an election in the middle of a pandemic.

Constitutional rights are either given by God or a bunch of dead guys...

If given by God...then they can never be removed or taken from you in the event of any "emergency".

If given to you by a bunch of dead guys...then running out of shampoo is sufficient reason to remove all of your constitutional rights.

 

[Resnic]

You are clueless---actually he did provide minor first aid to several people that night--band aid type stuff.

Gun was legally his. Adults buy guns all the time, and give the guns to their children as gifts.

I can vouch for that.

By the time I was 12 I owned 2 pistols, 1 shotgun, and 3 rifles my grandparents and uncle had gotten me. I kept them in my closet as a kid. When I was 5 or 6 I got a pellet gun before that and that's what I learned on.

Of course I also drove to school when I was 12 in middle school, I wasn't a typical kid.

 

[candycorn]

Not if your constitutional rights are allowed to be circumvented. Which is why we still had an election in the middle of a pandemic.

Constitutional rights are either given by God or a bunch of dead guys...

If given by God...then they can never be removed or taken from you in the event of any "emergency".

If given to you by a bunch of dead guys...then running out of shampoo is sufficient reason to remove all of your constitutional rights.

Not following that... God or a bunch of dead guys...shampoo... whatever.

 

[Flash]

You are clueless---actually he did provide minor first aid to several people that night--band aid type stuff.

Gun was legally his. Adults buy guns all the time, and give the guns to their children as gifts.

Just like here in Florida. He was prevented from purchasing the rifle but not prohibited from possessing it. Certainly not prohibited from using it for self defense.

 

[FA_Q2]

Not if your constitutional rights are allowed to be circumvented. Which is why we still had an election in the middle of a pandemic.

Constitutional rights are either given by God or a bunch of dead guys...

If given by God...then they can never be removed or taken from you in the event of any "emergency".

If given to you by a bunch of dead guys...then running out of shampoo is sufficient reason to remove all of your constitutional rights.

That they are intrinsic to our nature is in no way diminished by the fact that they can be infringed upon by those with power.

That does not make it correct or moral but their infringement also does not change the source.

 

[john doe 101]

“If any federal, state, or city level command was given for the police to stand down, this needs to be known and records released to the public.” Where exactly is there need for revision John Doe?

I was quite clear that if any type of communication did occur, if a verbal command to stand down happened, the public needs full disclosure. Nothing over the top about calling for communication records be reviewed JD. Are you of the mindset that governmental communication should be kept private regarding hostile situations and chaos? The choice to keep intel protected only involves protecting lives and in this case it certainly did not.

But see if it doesnt exist, you animals won't accept that, will you? You'll just keep on making stuff up to fit your narrative.

 

[DudleySmith]

Watch Sesame Street and cheer up!

He can't handle shows that deep.