Rittenhouse jury just went to deliberate

What will the verdict be?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 2 2.7%
  • Not guilty on all charges

    Votes: 53 72.6%
  • Some yes and some no

    Votes: 18 24.7%

  • Total voters
    73
Except it blows the whole "inviting a friend to the house" nonsense out of the water.

A curfew does prohibit people from being in curfew areas

Yes he was.

That was thrown out

Lets hope it not come to that. But a lengthy stay in prison is warranted for pop and fresh.
So in your world your right to assemble is negated by anyone with authority to declare a curfew?

Your voting rights can be negated by that same person as well then....same as your free speech rights and....
 
To someone's right to be there? Uh, no. Like plenty of minors before him, Kyle could have been picked up for curfew at one minute past time. Buuut he wasn't. Not the same as having "the right" to do it.


Selective enforcement would have been a violation of his rights.


Or do you imagine that the police should be ordered to arrest all people resisting the rioters, while the rioters are allowed to stay and then continue their riot once the cops clear out those with the will to resist?
 
Different strokes for different folks.
People in NYC are terrified because they are not in a suburb behind a gate.
Just admit you're a neo-Con.
Do you even know what a neo con is? You are continually proving to me that you are not worth wasting time on. You can’t express your views without name calling I’d and baseless accusations.

I don’t care about NYC. I don’t live there. I don’t vote there. I have no plans to visit.
 
Do you even know what a neo con is? You are continually proving to me that you are not worth wasting time on. You can’t express your views without name calling I’d and baseless accusations.

I don’t care about NYC. I don’t live there. I don’t vote there. I have no plans to visit.
They are easy to see. They are hunched over when they walk around from carrying the bribe money back from their latest Money Laundering vote. And they never have a War they weren't for.
 
Do you even know what a neo con is? You are continually proving to me that you are not worth wasting time on. You can’t express your views without name calling I’d and baseless accusations.

I don’t care about NYC. I don’t live there. I don’t vote there. I have no plans to visit.
A neo-Con is a globalist who loves slave labor, is greedy and suffers from avarice and doesn't give a shit about anyone but themselves.
A neo-Con sends other people to fight their fights.
A neo-Con does not consider events in context, but reacts emotionally and intellectually to every event that effects their assets, realized and unrealized,

Yes, I know many neo-Cons.
 
It looks like there’s a strong case for a mistrial to be declared before the verdict. Evidently the prosecution failed to turn over video evidence which would have benefitted the defense.

The prosecutor on this case needs to be fired as he’s both incompetent and dishonest.
 
Do you even know what a neo con is? You are continually proving to me that you are not worth wasting time on. You can’t express your views without name calling I’d and baseless accusations.

I don’t care about NYC. I don’t live there. I don’t vote there. I have no plans to visit.
name calling

The irony!
Someone else's suffering means nothing to you.
One day the police will not protect your block.
 
They are easy to see. They are hunched over when they walk around from carrying the bribe money back from their latest Money Laundering vote. And they never have a War they weren't for.
You are correct when you make the assertion that neo-cons are not opposed to continually committing troops overseas. They believe in nation building. They want to impose democracy by force even in nations where we know it won’t work. Afghanistan and Iraq are the two most recent examples.

They are also very much social liberals. They do not oppose big government. They just think they can manage big government better than liberals.

When it comes to this Rittenhouse situation I’m not sure where a neo con stands on that. I would think they are more inclined to support the defense because they claim to be pro law and order. The riots were the very definition of lawlessness and disorder.
 
The Grass is blue Donkey.
Typical Trump supporter below. All he needs is a MAGA hat :)

1637202386065.gif
 
15th post
It is more complicated than just quoting that law because there are referenced exemptions you have to look at.

The Prosecution conceded that the law did not apply to Kyle during the trial when asked to measure the gun and that is why the Judge dropped it.

Here is a better explanation



The lawyer is completely wrong and stupid.
The whole point of 29.593 is that there is an exception to the 948.60 statue if the minor is hunting and has a valid hunting license to prove it.
Since Kyle was not hunting and did not have a valid hunting license, then he is not eligable for the 29.593 exception.
 
A neo-Con is a globalist who loves slave labor, is greedy and suffers from avarice and doesn't give a shit about anyone but themselves.
A neo-Con sends other people to fight their fights.
A neo-Con does not consider events in context, but reacts emotionally and intellectually to every event that effects their assets, realized and unrealized,

Yes, I know many neo-Cons.
You’re little more than a Neo-NUT
So there is that.
 
Rittenhouse was standing there, protecting property from violent rioters. That is a legal act. And moral. And hurts no one. Helps people even.


The rioters, wanted to burn down other people's property causing great harm to them. That is an illegal act. ANd immoral. ANd hurts people.


How is it different? It is different in every way.
That's absurd. Rittenhouse wasn't authorized or qualified, or even asked to defend anything. Nothing I say should be construed to support the illegal actions of the rioters, but it must be noted that their illegal actions were intended to reduce the epidemic of cops killing black men with seemingly no consequences. If you want to condemn rioters, and call them vigilantes, I won't disagree with you, but that still doesn't justify Rittenhouse's vigilantism.
 
Back
Top Bottom